New career?

I disagree with felix that electronics engineers can't be pen pushers though, engineers are, by their very nature, pen pushers. The person with the soldering iron is generally (in lare companies anyway) a technician

That's a fair comment from AdamW. I sort of implied that the pen-pushing engineers couldn't do a good job. They certainly can; it's the demarcation of labour in the larger industrial companies that keeps them stuck behind a desk.

I can only speak for electronics engineers (sewage is a different ball game) but a lot of them don't like this one bit. I spent my days writing test procedures or doing failure rate analyses for equipment I would never see, still less get to work on, and I wasn't the only one who cast envious glances at the test engineers (or would that be test technicians) who got all the interesting jobs. I met very few desk-bound engineers who wouldn't rather be holding a soldering iron or a scope probe and it's these few I was talking about.

I wonder what it is that Teccy hates so much about industry (there's plenty to choose from). Is it being stuck behind a desk all day or is it another common problem. They kick you all around the factory because they want a job done then, when you've done it, they kick you out the door! Been there and done that too - twice.

Engineers going to work in suits? I've seen plenty of that. Chances are they work for a company that judges them more on their appearance than their technical ability. Perhaps their boss has no possible way of judging their technical ability!

How do you define an engineer? That's a very good question but I do have a possible, if somewhat simplistic, answer. An engineer is one who thinks in diagrams.

PS: Before somebody throws this one back at me, there are a few good engineers (but too many bad ones) who go to work in a suit and stick to their desks because they would rather be project managers. Somebody's got to do it.
 
Sponsored Links
True, true.

Don't hate me, but I am a "Systems Engineer" by job title. I don't often refer to myself as an engineer as I don't feel it is PROPER engineering. I don't get to design something to a component level, rather it is "black box" engineering.

For those unfamiliar with a "systems engineer", in the case of a car it might be that the systems engineers are given a brief by marketing on what kind of car they want to sell next year. So then the systems guys would write a set of requirements along the lines of "The car shall have an engine with a power output of 200kW. The car shall have an aircon system that will maintain a temperature of 21 celsius inside the cabin whilst the external ambient temperature is 40 celsius." etc. This gets passed to the "real" engineers, and other associated people (stylists?), who then beaver away designing the nuts and bolts of the car.

It has its advantages, you get to stick your fingers in lots of pies. But every now and then we get a mech eng or elec eng graduate, and they invariably get REALLY pi**ed off and demand to be transferred to a more fitting role.

I think techies don't like working in industry much because we are a wilfull lot. The industry doesn't look to the future, it looks to the customers' wallets. If I were an automotive engineer I would want to be working on a 400mph supercar that flies. I would find it hard to get excited about designing the next Ford Fiesta. :LOL: But, we all have to do what brings in the readies, because readies bring in the jollies.

I think it is the same with anything creative. I am sure that photographers get bored with doing school photos, for instance.
 
Systems Engineer? I've seen that job title around and I always assumed that it required a decent level of engineering ability. I don't know much about cars so I'll take a more familiar example.

"OK lads it's decision time. I say the boron rods go in from the top but the civil engineers are complaining about headroom and they want us to put them in sideways."

Is that a good example of systems engineering?

Here are some other job titles of rather dubious accuracy I saw on the internal vacancies notice board:

Commercial Engineer: Salesman??
Contracts Engineer: Lawyer.
Data Methods Engineer: Computer programmer.
Human Resources Engineer: Personnel Officer.
Progress Engineer: Your guess is as good as mine!

I have a theory about all of this because I once worked as a programmer in a department called Mathematical Services. When I asked why they employed mathematicians to do a programmer's job the answer came back, "It's easier to teach programming to a mathematician than it is to teach mathematics to a programmer". I couldn't argue with that. So instead of trying to teach engineering to a salesman/lawyer/etc you take on an engineer and try to turn them into something they're not.

Teccy, is that what happened to you?
 
Sponsored Links
felix said:
Human Resources Engineer: Personnel Officer.
progress Engineer: Your guess is as good as mine!

The process engineer works out who is redundant the HR person actually makes 'em redundant :LOL:
 
Back
Top