D
Deleted member 221031
Are 40 year contracts common ?
Old Conservatives don't understand
- Thread starter JohnD
- Start date
Sponsored Links
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 17,605
- Reaction score
- 2,421
- Country
No.
I note you aren’t able to admit you were wrong
D
Deleted member 221031
Right to buy wasn’t brilliant but councils have sold a lot more properties.
I know a gas engineer and what the council pay him to fit a standard combi is unbelievable! Close to twice the price you’d expect to pay.
Just one example of money wasting
Sponsored Links
D
Deleted member 221031
I’m still waiting for you to explain how landlords make money from paying for maintenance?
Take your time…..
D
Deleted member 221031
Exactly, it’s all corruption with the publics money.Like facilities management companies then.
Gotta pay them shareholders
And it was a failure
Ever heard of moral hazard?
Luckily councils are bringing services back in house
Coming home: local government insourcing | Public Finance
PF’s Dominic Brady looks at the slowdown in local government outsourcing and asks if the collapse of Carillion will stop it altogether. - Long form article, Public spending, Outsourcing, Central government, Local government, Procurement & outsourcing
www.publicfinance.co.uk
Three-quarters of councils move to insource services | LocalGov
Local authorities are rejecting the outsourcing of services in favour of delivering services in-house, a not-for-profit local government body has found.
www.localgov.co.uk
Outsourcing and privatisation | Institute for Government
What is the difference between privatisation and outsourcing?
www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk
Islington Council proposes ‘in-house by default’ policy to deliver quality and value | Islington Council News
Islington Council is to consult on an historic proposal that could give hundreds more workers better pay and conditions, improve the quality of council services and deliver better value for money for tax payers.
www.islington.media
D
Deleted member 221031
Tick, tock
D
Deleted member 221031
What’s your point ?And it was a failure
Ever heard of moral hazard?
Luckily councils are bringing services back in house
Coming home: local government insourcing | Public Finance
PF’s Dominic Brady looks at the slowdown in local government outsourcing and asks if the collapse of Carillion will stop it altogether. - Long form article, Public spending, Outsourcing, Central government, Local government, Procurement & outsourcing
Three-quarters of councils move to insource services | LocalGov
Local authorities are rejecting the outsourcing of services in favour of delivering services in-house, a not-for-profit local government body has found.
Outsourcing and privatisation | Institute for Government
What is the difference between privatisation and outsourcing?
Islington Council proposes ‘in-house by default’ policy to deliver quality and value | Islington Council News
Islington Council is to consult on an historic proposal that could give hundreds more workers better pay and conditions, improve the quality of council services and deliver better value for money for tax payers.
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 18,486
- Reaction score
- 2,796
- Country
The issue is not the competitive tendering, but the burden of terms placed on suppliers.
Compared to what?
You think outsourcing would be cheaper?
Do you know it’s actually in house?
D
Deleted member 221031
So that’s a failure of the out sourcing model then
But the issue is also private companies whose interest lies solely in shareholders and not customers.
They don’t care if it fails either. Carillion is a perfect example of moral hazard.
Housing association don’t run their maintenance side or outsourcing of maintenance at a loss
Therefore they make a profit.
I am sorry you keep being wrong, how embarrassing for you
Sponsored Links
