- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 17,602
- Reaction score
- 2,418
- Country
Nonsense.Exactly, it’s all corruption with the publics money.
Nonsense.Exactly, it’s all corruption with the publics money.
Housing association don’t run their maintenance side or outsourcing of maintenance at a loss
Therefore they make a profit.
I am sorry you keep being wrong, how embarrassing for you
If that’s not what you meant, then you are contradicting this:If you think that’s what I’ve said I can’t help you
I know a gas engineer and what the council pay him to fit a standard combi is unbelievable! Close to twice the price you’d expect to pay.
Just one example of money wasting
I didn’t say private landlordsOh dear me, that’s the worst comment you’ve posted!
Private landlords you initially stated! No you try and palm us off with that nonsense.
Please try
Are you aware of how contracts work and who gets them ?Nonsense.
Then their 30 year plan is shot to bits. I don't know why you keep ignoring that.it would be very easy for local councils to build homes, sell them at 50% discount after 5 years of renting them and repeat the process.
Motorbiking conveniently ignores the fact outsourcing means shareholders profits come firstIt's not the model, its the ridiculous ideals that the public sector always try to be "best in class" when "just good enough" will do. It's probably the profile of those suited to working in local government to blame. They'd rather spent time discussing 30 year plans, which tell them nothing, than being agile and creative.
it would be very easy for local councils to build homes, sell them at 50% discount after 5 years of renting them and repeat the process.
I’m stating the council waste money on outsourcing, sure you can grasp that ?If that’s not what you meant, then you are contradicting this:
You are all over the place.
It was implied.I didn’t say private landlords
Yes, first hand. Councils/HA's just don't have the resources to do everything in house that comes up.Are you aware of how contracts work and who gets them ?
So they outsource and pay well over the odds for it.Yes, first hand. Councils/HA's just don't have the resources to do everything in house that comes up.
You make an excellent case for a profitable right to buy model run by local government.Motorbiking conveniently ignores the fact outsourcing means shareholders profits come first
No. It's frequently cheaper than running a complete in house department.Can we agree on that ?
Why after all this time are councils moving back to direct labour then?No. It's frequently cheaper than running a complete in house department.