OMG indeed

NATO's not 'an army', it's a coalition. There's no need for a European army. A 'European Treaty Organisation', maybe. UK France Germany, Norway, Sweden and Poland might well commit to that. That's a well bloodier nose than Ukraine can give (and boy, they have done well); with 2 nuclear powers to counter-bluff the big talk from Vlad. I'm all for moving (slowly) away from US being the 'big boy'.
It's essential, the US joined late in WW1 and 2, they've signalled they wont be help'ing at all in the next European conflict.
 
It's essential, the US joined late in WW1 and 2, they've signalled they wont be help'ing at all in the next European conflict.
Trump won’t be leader forever.

It’s questionable whether he will last 4 years….the cognitive decline is advancing rapidly
 
Vance is the natural and legal successor, I’ve no doubt they will seek to cling onto power. Court rulings have already been ignored. Europe needs to ramp up its military spending.
 
So it turns out that the claim they weren't sharing war plans was correct. They shared attack orders, which is far worse. War plans would be a higher level with less detail. Attack orders mean the exact details on how it will occur.

To put it into UK context, during the Falklands the attack on Goose green was shared with the press and publicised too soon, the Argentinas were alerted and lives were probably lost as a result. This is not the same, this had the potential to be worse.

This would be the equivalent of leaking the operational orders explaining which company was going to be assaulting which location from where, where the fire support was to be based, the timings for the assault. Luckily the reporter in question didnt share that information until it was safe to do so, but the information that was leaked on an insecure medium was far far worse.
 
Vance is the natural and legal successor, I’ve no doubt they will seek to cling onto power. Court rulings have already been ignored. Europe needs to ramp up its military spending.
Think that is what the U.S has been saying.
 
The other aspect of this is it's possibly a war crime. They blew up a civilian block of flats to hit a single target. For that to be lawful they need to make every effort to avoid civilian casualties.

Given it was apparently an Israeli human intelligence asset, oh and yes leaking that was not great either, they might be able to justify it. But killing 50 innocents, probably including children, should always be something that leaves a bad taste in your mouth.
 
The other aspect of this is it's possibly a war crime. They blew up a civilian block of flats to hit a single target. For that to be lawful they need to make every effort to avoid civilian casualties.

Given it was apparently an Israeli human intelligence asset, oh and yes leaking that was not great either, they might be able to justify it. But killing 50 innocents, probably including children, should always be something that leaves a bad taste in your mouth.
The 'Hannibal Directive' allows them to indiscriminately murder civilians with impunity. It is a war crime.
 
and so she deleted them which she was not supposed to do as she had destroyed evidence which had been requested from her?
Well a judge has told the present mob to preserve the messages.

Seems to me a lot of folk are implying Hillary deleted emails, so is ok for everyone else be lax with security?

Isreal no too pleased as their man who eyeballed the Arab meeting his girl- he was mentioned in the chat
 
Last edited:
Well a judge has told the present mob to preserve the messages.

Seems to me a lot of folk are implying Hillary deleted emails, so is ok for everyone else be lax with security?

Isreal no too pleased as their man who eyeballed the Arab meeting his girl- he was mentioned in the chat
Except she took far greater care and none of it leaked.

Deleting emails and messages is different to mishandling sensitive information. One is illegal and the other is illegal and can cost lives.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DP
The 'Hannibal Directive' allows them to indiscriminately murder civilians with impunity. It is a war crime.
You have been on google again haven't you? Warned you about doing that and talking as though you know.
 

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
2K
durhamplumber
D
D
Replies
35
Views
2K
Deleted member 294929
D
D
Replies
36
Views
2K
Deleted member 294929
D
Back
Top