on ESC Website

Sponsored Links
it is then a faulty isolation transformer and the protection device(s) should operate
Even if primary and secondary are wound on the same bobbin, is it not possible to incorporate an earthed 'foil/whatever (as well as 'insulating tape') between them, such that it is effectively impossible for the primary-secondary isolation to fail without a protective device operating,even if the secondary is not earthed?
 
Sponsored Links
Yes Bernard it is the age old question, Can we guarantee floating will not be compromised? If yes then it is safer to float. If No then safer to Earth (Ground)
Indeed - in the case of an LV->ELV power supply. However, one presumably has to trust, or not trust, the isolation - in which case one would presumably never, or always, earth the ELV side?

It's different with LV-LV isolating transformers (e.g. 'shaver sockets'), since to earth the secondary would then ('dangerously') defeat the whole point of the isolation - so in that case one really has no choice but to 'trust the isolation'.

Kind Regards, John
 
Yes and the fact that each isolation transformer runs only one item of equipment is a great feature of this.
If you tried a similar set up but on a larger scale say the beefburger van and trailer running a few sockets and perhaps extension leads the the risks rapidly increase and therin lies the problem.

Our installations domestic and others contain more than one outlet, the risk of it becoming referenced to Earthlike increases greatly, so we deliberately earth/bond accordingly and mitigate risks from that stance.

If my home had two conductors with 230/240V across them and no voltage to earthy stuff and I could 99.99% guarantee it stays that way it could be a lot safer. But it is almost impossible, so Earthing and Bonding it is then.
 
..... If my home had two conductors with 230/240V across them and no voltage to earthy stuff and I could 99.99% guarantee it stays that way it could be a lot safer. But it is almost impossible, so Earthing and Bonding it is then.
Indeed so. Given that earth 'is all around us', electrical installations would be safer if they were not earth-referenced at all - since one would then not get shock if one simultaneously touched something earthed and one of the 'live' conductors.

However, as you say, that ideal is very rarely attainable (except in small, circumscribed, environments), so we have no real choice but to invoke "if you can't beat them, join them" by deliberately earthing and bonding.

Kindest Regards, John
 
Not easy, as far as I was aware, you must not earth SELV, with PELV you must earth, and with FELV you can decide what is best. Which asked of why
A circuit protective conductor shall be run to and terminated at each point in wiring and at each accessory except a
lampholder having no exposed-conductive-parts and suspended from such a point.
for an accessory which is SELV? There seems to be no exception for ELV with either earthing/bonding or RCD protection, common sense tells us under 50 volts we don't need to worry about it, but it does not say that.
Functional extra-low voltage (FELV). An extra-low voltage system in which not all of the protective measures
required for SELV or PELV have been applied.
PELV (protective extra-low voltage). An extra-low voltage system which is not electrically separated from Earth,
but which otherwise satisfies all the requirements for SELV.
SELV (separated extra-low voltage). An extra-low voltage system which is electrically separated from Earth and
from other systems in such a way that a single-fault cannot give rise to the risk of electric shock.
So what ever we think should be done, or it means, the book does tell us.
 
So what ever we think should be done, or it means, the book does tell us.
I'm not sure that there is much clarity in relation to that definition of FELV.
"... in which not all of the protective measures required for SELV or PELV have been applied."
... would seem to be vague in the extreme. Which of the "measures" are not applied? On the face of it, that would allow some pretty iffy situations to be described as "FELV", wouldn't it?
 
As said, we need to use common sense, in the snow, I have had quite a belt, enough to make me jump, from a gritter wagon's 24 volt battery. I remember some years ago arguing over if RCD protection was required for reduced low voltage supplies (110 volts) BS 7671:2008 was in force at the time, in the end did find
NOTE 2: The requirements of Regulation 411.3.3 do not apply to FELV systems according to Regulation 411.7 or reduced low voltage systems according to Regulation 411.8.
but it took some finding. (411.3.3)
Reduced low voltage system. A system in which the nominal line to line voltage does not exceed 110 volts and the nominal line to Earth voltage does not exceed 63.5 volts.
And in real terms most 110 transformers are designed to run from 230 volts, and most of our socket outlets are over 230 volts, so the RMS valve does exceed 110 volts in many cases.
 
50 volts AC is enough to cause an involuntary muscle reaction which could result in an accident.
Indeed - and, as I often say, not only that, but there are plenty of people who (often unknowingly) are walking about with hearts which are so 'electrically unstable' that they are at risk of electrocution with shocks of appreciably less than 50 V.

However, for example, being frighting by, say, a sudden noise or movement of a cat or dog whilst one is up a ladder could also 'result in an accident' :)

Risks need to be considered 'in perspective'!
 
The problem with keeping things floating that it`s difficult to confirm achievement 100% of the time, is some conductor is by design or accident referenced to earth and we are unaware of it then the safety we enjoy in a bathroom and a proper isolated SELV safety socket is easily defeated.
PS SELF in a bathroom would not be considered SELV at 50V either.
Yup one side gets strapped to earth and your float idea disappears so back to square one and earthing/bonding.
Pity the earth is not a massive flat piece of conductor like copper or aluminium too, otherwise it would get more reliable if we need to earth things,
two earths at a distance can be at differing potentials until we get farther away.
Those early Daleks that ran on metal plates just like our 1960s and 1970s Dodgem Bumper Cars had a good idea :giggle:
 

DIYnot Local

Staff member

If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.

Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.


Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local

 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top