People smuggler jailed for 17 years: 1 tier Labour

[Odds]

All the illegal ones “boat people” are included in this figures I take it ??

I’ll answer that, no they aren’t.

So my comment stands. DIM Notchy

resorting to abuse before you've got your facts right?
Again.

 

[Odds]

In the year ending June 2024, 38,784 irregular arrivals were detected, which is 26% fewer than in the previous year. 81% of these arrivals were by small boat. The volume of enforced returns has increased by 69% from 4,159 in the year ending 31 March 23 to 7,030 in the year ending 31 March 2024. In the year ending 31 December 2022 there were 3,821 enforced returns.

Guv.UK

 

[carmanmemoranda]

so far not so good. Numbers are rocketing under Labour. Ever since they announced they'd scrap the only deterrent that was discouraging people.

Hmm. You never said what the Tories actually did

I'd still say labour will Probably be better than them

 

[Notch7]

All the illegal ones “boat people” are included in this figures I take it ??

93% of people arriving by boat claim asylum (until Tories said they could ALL stay permanently)

I’ll answer that, no they aren’t.

So my comment stands. DIM Notchy

Your comment fail, like every other nonsense you write.

You should go back to the CC, at least you might know something there

 

[Notch7]

Numbers are rocketing under Labour. Ever since they announced they'd scrap the only deterrent that was discouraging people.

That’s bolox

The numbers are for the months July, August, Sept
which are similar to 2023 same months and lower than the mahoosive numbers in 2022 under useless Tory muppets.

You lose

 

[Notch7]

Notch needs to spend an afternoon in the gallery of appeals. It’s farcical, the state are always outgunned with better lawyers representing the claimant. Huge industry of "civil rights" lawyers making a fortune helping people pretend they aren't what they are.

Your opinion doesn’t prove they are not genuine

You are welcome to provide some evidence

 

[aveatry]

Evidence shows they aren’t fake.

What evidence.
If they throw their passports / ID/ mobile phones in the channel then how can they prove who they are or where they came from.

 

[Munroast]

Unqualified statement, Totally meaningless

I could say “Plenty are legit refugees, a few aren’t”

Without any any numbers it means nothing….oh wait a minute, home office figures show majority are genuine….so that’s you comment in the bin.

It is a very low bar, and they have to give the benefit of the doubt, all you need is a plausible story and the wit to have misplaced all of your paperwork (it fell off the dingy into the channel)

Lets think of a possible scenario - I'm gay and my country has a history of defenestration for men such as I - OK application granted -

a month later, 'I need to bring my family over, I have a right to a family life' - OK would this be for you boy friend' - 'No my 19 children, my 3 wives their siblings and cousins' - 'but you said you were gay' - 'It was just a phase i went through' OK we will arrange the tickets and a few streets of houses, welcome to Britain

 

[denso13]

Lets think of a possible scenario - I'm gay and my country has a history of defenestration for men such as I - OK application granted -

a month later, 'I need to bring my family over, I have a right to a family life' - OK would this be for you boy friend' - 'No my 19 children, my 3 wives their siblings and cousins' - 'but you said you were gay' - 'It was just a phase i went through' OK we will arrange the tickets and a few streets of houses, welcome to Britain

Which you have just dreamt up and has no basis in reality.

 

[denso13]

What evidence.

The majority of boat people who applied for asylum were accepted as genuine. Pretty clear evidence.

 

[aveatry]

The majority of boat people who applied for asylum were accepted as genuine. Pretty clear evidence.

But how If they throw their passports / ID/ mobile phones in the channel then how can they prove who they are or where they came from.
Or is that a myth and they all come with their passports and ID or do we just give them the benefit of doubt or are tax payers NGOs paying for their lawyers.

 

[Nwgs2]

detected

That’s the important part!

Thank you for proving my point.

 

[Notch7]

What evidence.
If they throw their passports / ID/ mobile phones in the channel then how can they prove who they are or where they came from.

You can’t obtain asylum without providing evidence of who you are and where you come from.

So the asylum process tells us

 

[Notch7]

It is a very low bar, and they have to give the benefit of the doubt, all you need is a plausible story and the wit to have misplaced all of your paperwork (it fell off the dingy into the channel)

Lets think of a possible scenario - I'm gay and my country has a history of defenestration for men such as I - OK application granted -

a month later, 'I need to bring my family over, I have a right to a family life' - OK would this be for you boy friend' - 'No my 19 children, my 3 wives their siblings and cousins' - 'but you said you were gay' - 'It was just a phase i went through' OK we will arrange the tickets and a few streets of houses, welcome to Britain

I await your evidence.

 

[Notch7]

That’s the important part!

Thank you for proving my point.

It doesnt

93% of people in small boats claim asylum

So you continue to be totally wrong