Police Brutality

  • Thread starter Johnmelad502
  • Start date
Sponsored Links
It's just plain silly mate. Tomlinson was attacked. Gedditt?
 
Sponsored Links
This country really is in a shocking state... and a lot of you are to blame....

OK, let's get rid of the police, so they don't brutalise us (i.e. slap a non-compliant protestor) anymore, and what will happen? Well let's just assume too, that the army needs disbanding, otherwise, they will just become the coppers but with guns.... So, it's Monday morning, and no more coppers... well all you plumbers will have your vans nicked... and those of you with shops... well you don't have one anymore. Oh and your daughters and wives are getting raped by that gang that just showed up with lots of guns.... and you with nice houses... well you better run and find a shanty town... etc etc..

So i guess what i'm trying to say is that this society works because of law and order...but some of you lot (and those idiots at the front of the riots) just want rid of it.... what you gonna do for controlling the scum of society?

Human beings aren't perfect, by a long way, but this society thing we have here is pretty good all things considered....

But you always get the individual who think they're better than the whole - take the human rights fiasco... human rights are important, but the human right of the individual shouldn't outweigh the human rights of the many...

The police don't brutalise (re the OP) they (very) occasionally get things wrong - JCD was a nightmare example... but what are you doubters gonna put in it's place? and can you guarantee 100%?

That silly woman who recently got a slap at a demo and she certainly wasn't brutalised, but like most of the idiots who stay at a protest march once the pushing and shoving starts, and the bottles and bricks start to fly, well they deserve a baton round up their rectums !!!

Mistakes will always happen, but if we had a bit more respect in this society... things would get better...
 
The autopsy found nothing (surprise surprise). Whitewash.

An autopsy was carried out by the lawyers acting on behalf of the family

After the first one removed the evidence?

...with the help of the Lizard people perhaps?

If you were in a car crash and died within minutes of it happening - would your family say it was just a coincidence. He'd have died before he reached his destination anyway? Never mind.
 
And you think that wasnt the establishment closing ranks and whitewashing it ? I bet you think Dr David Kelly committed suicide as well.
Not, I believe that someone with PROVEN history of illness, heart problems and alcohol abuse dying in the middle of a protest/riot is very plausible...without a push being to life/death event.
Hypothetical question for you.. If I get a 6inch nail and ram it within ...say , 2mm away from someones medulla oblongata...but not enough to kill them, and then later on you came home to find him standing on your doorstep with no physical marks to show of his injury and after asking him to move many times do you can get in, you push past him and knock that last 2mm causing him to die....is THAT manslaughter?

Please answer that in isolation to the G20 stuff...

Can be, manslaughter is unlawful killing without intent. Since you drove the original nails in, if he dies within a year and a day then it can be laid at your door.
Indeed, but would think this fair if you were the person just trying to get into their home? Would you accept the Manslaughter sentence?

Yes, but you wernt just trying to get in your home, you previously attacked him with nails. That makes you culpable in the event of death from his injuries in the eyes of the law.

Since you mention it, it was also the second time that day Mr Tomlinson had been attacked by the police as well............
 
And you think that wasnt the establishment closing ranks and whitewashing it ? I bet you think Dr David Kelly committed suicide as well.
Not, I believe that someone with PROVEN history of illness, heart problems and alcohol abuse dying in the middle of a protest/riot is very plausible...without a push being to life/death event.
Hypothetical question for you.. If I get a 6inch nail and ram it within ...say , 2mm away from someones medulla oblongata...but not enough to kill them, and then later on you came home to find him standing on your doorstep with no physical marks to show of his injury and after asking him to move many times do you can get in, you push past him and knock that last 2mm causing him to die....is THAT manslaughter?

Please answer that in isolation to the G20 stuff...

Can be, manslaughter is unlawful killing without intent. Since you drove the original nails in, if he dies within a year and a day then it can be laid at your door.
Indeed, but would think this fair if you were the person just trying to get into their home? Would you accept the Manslaughter sentence?

Yes, but you wernt just trying to get in your home, you previously attacked him with nails. That makes you culpable in the event of death from his injuries in the eyes of the law.

Since you mention it, it was also the second time Mr Tomlinson had been attacked by the police as well............

No no you read it wrong, 'I' put the nail in his head, 'you' pushed him out the way.
 
This country really is in a shocking state... and a lot of you are to blame....

OK, let's get rid of the police, so they don't brutalise us (i.e. slap a non-compliant protestor) anymore, and what will happen? Well let's just assume too, that the army needs disbanding, otherwise, they will just become the coppers but with guns.... So, it's Monday morning, and no more coppers... well all you plumbers will have your vans nicked... and those of you with shops... well you don't have one anymore. Oh and your daughters and wives are getting raped by that gang that just showed up with lots of guns.... and you with nice houses... well you better run and find a shanty town... etc etc..

So i guess what i'm trying to say is that this society works because of law and order...but some of you lot (and those idiots at the front of the riots) just want rid of it.... what you gonna do for controlling the scum of society?

Human beings aren't perfect, by a long way, but this society thing we have here is pretty good all things considered....

But you always get the individual who think they're better than the whole - take the human rights fiasco... human rights are important, but the human right of the individual shouldn't outweigh the human rights of the many...

The police don't brutalise (re the OP) they (very) occasionally get things wrong - JCD was a nightmare example... but what are you doubters gonna put in it's place? and can you guarantee 100%?

That silly woman who recently got a slap at a demo and she certainly wasn't brutalised, but like most of the idiots who stay at a protest march once the pushing and shoving starts, and the bottles and bricks start to fly, well they deserve a baton round up their rectums !!!

Mistakes will always happen, but if we had a bit more respect in this society... things would get better...

Get rid of the Police bad apples and Bully Boys and they might get a bit more eh?
 
The autopsy found nothing (surprise surprise). Whitewash.

An autopsy was carried out by the lawyers acting on behalf of the family

After the first one removed the evidence?

...with the help of the Lizard people perhaps?

If you were in a car crash and died within minutes of it happening - would your family say it was just a coincidence. He'd have died before he reached his destination anyway? Never mind.

..and your answer to the hypothetical?
 
Sorry mate but that is just too silly for words.
 
Sorry mate but that is just too silly for words.
Why is it silly? Because you realise that the only reasonable answer is that, "no that is not manslaughter..the fact that he is 2mm away from death has nothing to do with you, and all you were trying to do was act within your authority and go about your life. Yes it was unfortunate that he died but you are not responsible"


...edit

I mean by all means say that the analogy is false for (x) reason, but atleast answer the question first.
 
The autopsy found nothing (surprise surprise). Whitewash.

An autopsy was carried out by the lawyers acting on behalf of the family

After the first one removed the evidence?

...with the help of the Lizard people perhaps?

You think coroners dont interfere with evidence and collude with the police?

You really are naive to the point of absurdity.

Have a look at the case of Sally Clark. The convictions were based solely on the analysis of the deaths by the Home Office Pathologist Alan Williams, who failed to disclose relevant information about the deaths, and backed up by the paediatric professor Sir Roy Meadow, whose opinion was pivotal in several other child death convictions, many of which have been overturned or are in the process of being disputed. In 2005 Williams was found guilty of serious professional misconduct and barred from practicing pathology for 3 years.

Furthermore, the government has now given itself the powers to take over a coroners inquest, hold it in secret and put in its own obedient yes man to make the findings it wants.

And look at the David Kelly case - Lord Hutton has sealed the papers for 75 years, in order to stop 6 doctors carrying out there own post mortem. Theres clearly something there they dont want us to find out about.

And you still have faith in the findings of government run inquests and post mortems? You need to wake up and smell the coffee, we are having the wool pulled over our eyes all the time!!! The Establishment protects itself and makes sure nothing untoward gets out!! This is a police state, with state control of the truth!!!
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top