Prescott the fat fkkr...

[empip]

....I mean, who could be so devoid of any semblence of self respect than the DPM?? Deputy PM without portfolio, more like deputy dawg crapping on the streets of his betters.. Whilst keeping clear of the 'real' (not our choice) deputy pm...
If Brown is next in line, DPM should be relegated to the pay commensurate with the menial tasks he occasionaly carries out .. Perhaps as a civil servant.......!!

Come on Atonius ... told you what was what Tue Apr 25, 2006 !!

And yet, still, the old duffer does not climb onto his sword !!

Couldn't they all learn a thing or two from another Margaret ---- Beckett.

 

[Brightness]

theres no need for the language though - there are ladies present! brightness, toffee, mlb etc.

Aww a proper gentleman... Of course I would never ever swear. Why only this morning when a mug fell out of the cupboard and hit my cheek bone did I only say 'Oh flippity'

swearing on telly is one thing - its for entertainment, adds to the humour / drama.

swearing in real life in front of a respectable lady (or a lady one wishes to romance) is altogether different - i dont think its on.

OK then, which one of us has pulled

 

[Zampa]

swearing on telly is one thing - its for entertainment, adds to the humour / drama.

swearing in real life in front of a respectable lady (or a lady one wishes to romance) is altogether different - i dont think its on.

Unless they set the level by swearing first..I never swear in front of a fem unless they do..

One thing I do hate though..seeing a woman either smoking or gobbing in the street.

Back to the thread..Prescott, Cook..and the ugly tory whos name escapes me must all be hung like gorillas...what else do they have going for them?...id spend all evening in a club with me best suit on..acting as cool as a cucumber, trying to pull a decent fem...id even buy em a large doner if I thought I was going to get my card stamped..but no...along comes a pig ugly MP and sweeps them from under my feet!

 

[plastered]

...id even buy em a large doner if I thought I was going to get my card stamped..

'swoon'!

 

[Doc Lenny]

This Just In!!

http://putfile.com/pic.php?pic=4/11608572718.jpg&s=x402

 

[Brightness]

Hahaha I particularly liked the closing paragraph about her being an elephant trainer

 

[Nige F]

Prescot the Fakir ..not wise enough

 

[Softus]

softus i'm already at work and so bored i eventually took the dubious step of actually reading your post and what a load of tosh you have come out with!

I don't think so. There's a world of difference between me coming out with tosh, and you being unable to understand what I've written. Have you any specific criticism to make? Ah yes - here they come. Let's reel 'em in and have ourselves some fun...

Firstly what's with this publicy and privately stuff ?? what relevence does it have in this context whether i would want to stand on top of a mountain and shout or whisper behind a door??

This one is easy. I was referring to this post of yours:

As I don't know him personally i'll leave my comments to myself.

That was your reference to some private comment. The comment that you wrote was the public comment. Next.

those posters were entitled to their opinions and whether i agree or disagree is up to me i didn't criticise them but merely said i (that's me,myself and I) won't comment on prescott as i don't know the facts.

No. You didn't. You said:

As I don't know him personally i'll leave my comments to myself.

as for the rest of your post seems you are building up a portfolio of an opinion of someone you don't know(myself) and coming out with comments with no bearing on what i have said in my posts.

You're entitled to think that I'm building up a portfolio, but I don't know why you would think that, since my posts are based entirely on an observation of what you've written.

In your previous post you say i havn't criticised others before, had you researched and looked at older posts you'd know this isn't the case.

No, I said that you didn't know them, not that you hadn't criticised them before. It's true that I hadn't looked at older posts, but you didn't refer to any other posts, so why would I? If you're telling me that you do know them, and are basing your judgment at least partially on that knowledge, then it doesn't change the fact that you're judging them.

if i was to comply with one of Softus's Commandments then to be able to post on every criticism of others i'd have to be on this forum 24/7 sorry I have another life elsewhere from this forum but feel free to do so yourself if you want!

I can't make sense of the beginning of this paragraph, but please be assured that I already do feel free to do what I want, and entirely without your permission.

your previous post is also full of implication and your own logical conclusions

Full of implication? Really? There were no implications, actually, but one inference, and only one logical conclusion, both of which I clearly explained.

...that you seem to have totally got the wrong end of the stick on everything said, therefore i cannot comment further on the post as it is totally meaningless and not relevant to any post here.

The general consensus from your above posts and i'm now talking from experience of what you have said is.....

I don't think you mean consensus - or have you privately canvassed opinion about this?

...you really havn't got a clue what you are talking about and therefore should keep quiet and not have a dig at others until you are justified to do so.

Whether or not I'm quiet is a matter for me and for the forum owners, but I'm not having a dig, just observing your hypocrisy, and with full justification, as already explained.

You could clarify the whole matter, if you wished, by stating which of the following is incorrect or untrue:

1. You are not prepared to publicly judge John Prescott.
2. You are prepared to privately judge John Prescott.
3. You disapprove of the public judgment of John Prescott.

 

[markie]

If your in the limelight and your a M. P. you should exspect good s##t and bad s##t to be writen about yourself, it go's with the job.
So stop arguing and give 2 sh##'s more sh#t,

 

[kendor]

Then I presume you are saying he shouldn't be judged for LANDING A PUNCH ON THE JAW OF A MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC as we only saw this on the television and the media was involved.

In giving the member of the public the egg?

 

[kendor]

softus i'm already at work and so bored i eventually took the dubious step of actually reading your post and what a load of tosh you have come out with!

I don't think so. There's a world of difference between me coming out with tosh, and you being unable to understand what I've written. Have you any specific criticism to make? Ah yes - here they come. Let's reel 'em in and have ourselves some fun...

Firstly what's with this publicy and privately stuff ?? what relevence does it have in this context whether i would want to stand on top of a mountain and shout or whisper behind a door??

This one is easy. I was referring to this post of yours:

As I don't know him personally i'll leave my comments to myself.

That was your reference to some private comment. The comment that you wrote was the public comment. Next.

those posters were entitled to their opinions and whether i agree or disagree is up to me i didn't criticise them but merely said i (that's me,myself and I) won't comment on prescott as i don't know the facts.

No. You didn't. You said:

As I don't know him personally i'll leave my comments to myself.

as for the rest of your post seems you are building up a portfolio of an opinion of someone you don't know(myself) and coming out with comments with no bearing on what i have said in my posts.

You're entitled to think that I'm building up a portfolio, but I don't know why you would think that, since my posts are based entirely on an observation of what you've written.

In your previous post you say i havn't criticised others before, had you researched and looked at older posts you'd know this isn't the case.

No, I said that you didn't know them, not that you hadn't criticised them before. It's true that I hadn't looked at older posts, but you didn't refer to any other posts, so why would I? If you're telling me that you do know them, and are basing your judgment at least partially on that knowledge, then it doesn't change the fact that you're judging them.

if i was to comply with one of Softus's Commandments then to be able to post on every criticism of others i'd have to be on this forum 24/7 sorry I have another life elsewhere from this forum but feel free to do so yourself if you want!

I can't make sense of the beginning of this paragraph, but please be assured that I already do feel free to do what I want, and entirely without your permission.

your previous post is also full of implication and your own logical conclusions

Full of implication? Really? There were no implications, actually, but one inference, and only one logical conclusion, both of which I clearly explained.

...that you seem to have totally got the wrong end of the stick on everything said, therefore i cannot comment further on the post as it is totally meaningless and not relevant to any post here.

The general consensus from your above posts and i'm now talking from experience of what you have said is.....

I don't think you mean consensus - or have you privately canvassed opinion about this?

...you really havn't got a clue what you are talking about and therefore should keep quiet and not have a dig at others until you are justified to do so.

Whether or not I'm quiet is a matter for me and for the forum owners, but I'm not having a dig, just observing your hypocrisy, and with full justification, as already explained.

You could clarify the whole matter, if you wished, by stating which of the following is incorrect or untrue:

1. You are not prepared to publicly judge John Prescott.
2. You are prepared to privately judge John Prescott.
3. You disapprove of the public judgment of John Prescott.

Softus can you rewrite this post so that it makes one iota of sense!
i've read it several times now and it's total nonsense!

 

[kendor]

softus i'm already at work and so bored i eventually took the dubious step of actually reading your post and what a load of tosh you have come out with!

I don't think so. There's a world of difference between me coming out with tosh, and you being unable to understand what I've written. Have you any specific criticism to make? Ah yes - here they come. Let's reel 'em in and have ourselves some fun...

Firstly what's with this publicy and privately stuff ?? what relevence does it have in this context whether i would want to stand on top of a mountain and shout or whisper behind a door??

This one is easy. I was referring to this post of yours:

As I don't know him personally i'll leave my comments to myself.

That was your reference to some private comment. The comment that you wrote was the public comment. Next.

those posters were entitled to their opinions and whether i agree or disagree is up to me i didn't criticise them but merely said i (that's me,myself and I) won't comment on prescott as i don't know the facts.

No. You didn't. You said:

As I don't know him personally i'll leave my comments to myself.

as for the rest of your post seems you are building up a portfolio of an opinion of someone you don't know(myself) and coming out with comments with no bearing on what i have said in my posts.

You're entitled to think that I'm building up a portfolio, but I don't know why you would think that, since my posts are based entirely on an observation of what you've written.

In your previous post you say i havn't criticised others before, had you researched and looked at older posts you'd know this isn't the case.

No, I said that you didn't know them, not that you hadn't criticised them before. It's true that I hadn't looked at older posts, but you didn't refer to any other posts, so why would I? If you're telling me that you do know them, and are basing your judgment at least partially on that knowledge, then it doesn't change the fact that you're judging them.

if i was to comply with one of Softus's Commandments then to be able to post on every criticism of others i'd have to be on this forum 24/7 sorry I have another life elsewhere from this forum but feel free to do so yourself if you want!

I can't make sense of the beginning of this paragraph, but please be assured that I already do feel free to do what I want, and entirely without your permission.

your previous post is also full of implication and your own logical conclusions

Full of implication? Really? There were no implications, actually, but one inference, and only one logical conclusion, both of which I clearly explained.

...that you seem to have totally got the wrong end of the stick on everything said, therefore i cannot comment further on the post as it is totally meaningless and not relevant to any post here.

The general consensus from your above posts and i'm now talking from experience of what you have said is.....

I don't think you mean consensus - or have you privately canvassed opinion about this?

...you really havn't got a clue what you are talking about and therefore should keep quiet and not have a dig at others until you are justified to do so.

Whether or not I'm quiet is a matter for me and for the forum owners, but I'm not having a dig, just observing your hypocrisy, and with full justification, as already explained.

You could clarify the whole matter, if you wished, by stating which of the following is incorrect or untrue:

1. You are not prepared to publicly judge John Prescott.
2. You are prepared to privately judge John Prescott.
3. You disapprove of the public judgment of John Prescott.

Softus can you rewrite this post so that it makes one iota of sense!
i've read it several times now and it's total nonsense!

 

[Softus]

can you rewrite this post so that it makes one iota of sense!
i've read it several times now and it's total nonsense!

www.peakenglish.com

 

[Softus]

can you rewrite this post so that it makes one iota of sense!
i've read it several times now and it's total nonsense!

www.peakenglish.com

 

[plastered]

Prescot the Fakir ..not wise enough

it would seem, however, that a man of his, erm, calibre ( not to mention the fact that he has a face ´like a bulldog chewing a wasp`) must have perfomed some kind of magic in order to woo this woman. Think the `feat of great endurance´ was more her part.