Zionists like Filly love to misrepresent the truth.
Some of them claim that their seizure of Palestine was authorised by the Balfour declaration.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
Interesting aspect - accords or what ever have no bearing on the laws concerning occupied territory, Why - to prevent people from signing their rights away.As negotiated and agreed to with the arabs in the Oslo 2 accords, the West Bank is split into 3 areas, areas a, b and c.
Only area C is under Israeli control.
90% of arabs live in areas a and b.
That needed laws and actions to control their population This sort of thing may explain why the US is concerned about more troubles springing up from Arab counties in this general area.Egyptians were intelligent enough to sign a peace deal with them.
LOL I was just pointing out the results of wars that were annexations. UK and others pretty good at doing it.So really, Israel and the surrounding arab areas should be given back to Turkey in order to comply with International law.
All you've stated so far on here are: 'oh no it isnt's'. Which is not at all convincing.Wrong.
With IDF and various refugee camps that % isn't entirely true. Geneva convention is pretty clear on occupation. The residents are allowed to shoot the enemy and don't need to wear uniforms. That relates to shooting IDF. The IDF raids usually include punishment aspects - that again is breaking a law.This means that the Palestinians will control approximately 40 per cent of the West Bank and Gaza after the Israeli withdrawal.
I'm assuming "Blockade on journalism" is a reference to the Israel's military warning Reuters and Agence France Presse that it can't guarantee the safety of their journalists operating in the region because there's a war going on?they (Israel) have so many gullible useful idiots in the West
Some of them spout total distorted arguments and untruths.
Why is there a blockade on journalism operating in Gaza?
Does Gaza have a dedicated media operating from Gaza, in the same way as the Israel Hayom?
It's a free newspaper, one of the (if not the largest) in Israel and is owned by friends of Netanyahu.
Israel Hayom - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
No I didn't state that "Palestine had already been destroyed". I stated that there is no such country as "Palestine" and there never has been.Remember when you said and no longer exists?
Your playbook is easy to see.
Israel's genocide continues.
Isolated acts of violence and discrimination carried out by Israeli jews, is no recent thing. However, none of it was the result of Israeli policy. Those that have carried them out are far removed from mainstream Israeli society, have few links with the settler movement, and are condemned throughout Israel. Dragging these aberrant individuals and groups into this debate does not for one moment contradict the fact that there have never been large-scale massacres carried out against the Arabs, nor does it even remotely balance out the barbarous actions of the "Palestinians" over the decades. Whose violence is orchestrated and celebrated by its terrorist leadership. These are very different things."Violent, right-wing Israeli extremists further undermined any possibility of the Oslo Accords leading to a lasting peace. In particular, the February 1994 massacre of 29 Palestinians as they prayed in occupied Hebron by a U.S.-born settler, which began a wave of violence that undermined support for negotiations on both sides, and the assassination of Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin in November 1995 by a Jewish extremist opposed to any negotiations with the Palestinians or withdrawal from occupied Palestinian land.
However, none of it was the result of Israeli policy.
there have never been large-scale massacres carried out against the Arabs
Filly is blinded by racist hatred.
UK study of 1948 Israeli massacre of Palestinian village reveals mass grave sites
Researchers analysed cartographic data and aerial photos to identify three possible locations in former fishing village Tanturawww.theguardian.com