Professor stock

[sxturbo]

Did you read all of her comments?


Please present any links to any aggression she has had to face.


Of course any other transphobe would agree with what she says.
Hundreds of other academics would not, and were so outraged that they found the need to write an open letter condemning her comments.

There is nothing wrong with saying what stock has said.

The other academics have signed the letter to distance themselves purely to save their own arse.

Also the very fact she had to have CCTV installed and the police had to give her advice on being safe and telling her not to go to work for a number of weeks because of the death threats she received is proof enough that the trans people were being overly aggressive. This has been widely reported in the news

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.sp...en-stock-is-the-real-victim-of-hate-here/amp/

https://www.feministcurrent.com/202...following-threats-over-gender-critical-posts/

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/...n-trans-row-urged-to-get-bodyguards-2khmgzk98

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/...en-stock-professor-in-trans-dispute-ghq906cv8

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.da...told-bodyguards-students-demanded-sacked.html

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.th...ffectively-ended-by-unions-transphobia-claims

 

[JohnD]

It's a funny thing, all these aggressive TRAs viciously hounding a University Professor for doing her job, but strangely reluctant to produce evidence of her writings that support their hysterical hatred.

You'd think they'd be able to find something.

Same as they did with Rowling.

 

[JohnD]

Remember?

https://mobile.twitter.com/dataracer117/status/1272737061703790592?lang=en

 

[sxturbo]

You can't say stock is abusing her platform, she isn't she questions students thoughts, likewise her students question hers.

She admits that's how it's done, that's philosophy.

However the problem here is that she apparently isn't allowed to have a thought, and instead of challenging tra's decide instead to go into attack mode and try to get her sacked, send threats to her and defame her online and through university, all the while screaming they don't feel safe, because she says if you have a cock and balls you shouldn't enter a female changing room?


I think the wider point is that tra's realise their is a few flaws in their thinking and can't handle that they are being questioned and thus their only way to deal with it is to become aggressive.

 

[JohnD]

 

[JohnD]

The people who "don't feel safe" are the victims of TRA aggression.

 

[AngleEyes]

There is nothing wrong with saying what stock has said.

If you agree with her comments and/if you are also transphobic, then you will see nothing wrong with her views.
However, over a hundred other academics describe her views as promoting discrimination and violence against another group in society.

The other academics have signed the letter to distance themselves purely to save their own arse.

To save their own arse from what?

Also the very fact she had to have CCTV installed and the police had to give her advice on being safe and telling her not to go to work for a number of weeks because of the death threats she received is proof enough that the trans people were being overly aggressive.

Over a hundred academics describe her outspoken views as promoting discrimination and violence against transgender people, I'd call that aggressive. Wouldn't you?

 

[AngleEyes]

You can't say stock is abusing her platform, she isn't she questions students thoughts, likewise her students question hers.

She admits that's how it's done, that's philosophy.

Over a hundred other academics and philosophers disagree with her methods of exploiting her status, and her views.

 

[AngleEyes]

The people who "don't feel safe" are the victims of TRA aggression.

And the transgender people who have suffered discrimination and violence promoted by such views as those of Prof Stocks.
Prof Stocks has claimed that transgenders cannot change their biological sex, and therefore cannot be treated as their chosen gender. In effect, that promotes the idea that transgender people cannot exist.

 

[sxturbo]

And the transgender people who have suffered discrimination and violence promoted by such views as those of Prof Stocks.

What violence because of stock and jk Rowling?

Please provide evidence

 

[AngleEyes]

What violence because of stock and jk Rowling?

Please provide evidence

Don't be silly, That'd be like asking for evidence of race hate crime because of Boris's reference to letter boxes and bank robbers.
It is the promotion of prejudice that causes violence, not the voice of any one individual. But when that one individual voice is of a recognised academic, then more weight is given to their views. Thus the transphobes are empowered to act violently.

Imagine allowing someone to stand up in front of a class of students and claim that, due to their own prejudice, they believe that a certain race of people cannot be allowed to exist.

 

[sxturbo]

Don't be silly, That'd be like asking for evidence of race hate crime because of Boris's reference to letter boxes and bank robbers.
It is the promotion of prejudice that causes violence, not the voice of any one individual. But when that one individual voice is of a recognised academic, then more weight is given to their views. Thus the transphobes are empowered.

Ahhh I see....

But it's ok for trans people and you request evidence that they have committed acts of aggression.

What you really mean is that there is zero link between prof Scott and jk Rowling against trans.

 

[JohnD]

such views as those of Prof Stocks

Please provide a source showing the words she actually used.

Not your version.

BTW a man is not a woman, and a man cannot become a woman by saying "I am a woman."

 

[AngleEyes]

What you really mean is that there is zero link between prof Scott and jk Rowling against trans.

Don't be silly, they are both committed feminists and transphobes. They are both highly visible public figures and they exploit that public position to espouse their transphobic views, thereby empowering other transphobes.
Imagine a highly visible public figure speaking about a race of people, or a religion, that shouldn't or couldn't exist.
I suspect they'd suffer a fair amount of similar public attention, and maybe some may feel inclined to respond with aggressive comments, like they have endured at the hands of Prof Stocks and JK Rowling.

 

[JohnD]

they are both committed feminists and transphobes.

Another barmy opinion

By a TRA.