- Joined
- 22 Aug 2006
- Messages
- 5,794
- Reaction score
- 709
- Country
Someone - can't remember who - said the Black sea has minefields which would take months tro clear. Commercial shipping can't go in because it can't get insurance.
There is also the problem that the Russian black sea fleet includes submarines.I can't see anyone volunteering their warships as targets, even with the added opportunity to potentially start WW3.
No. Some reporters are questioning the wisdom of the war. ie What each side actually wins. That will get worse as time goes on.Usual suspects pushing for appeasement of Russia are
French
Germans
Italians
Romanians
What makes you think that? Haven't you noticed that no NATO country wants to get directly involved in the fighting? NO NATO COUNTRY. There could be more than the obvious reason behind that.Push comes to shove several nato countries would not amount to a bag of beans
Article 5
Plenty would waver and could not be relied upon
Yes they do seem to be.The video link you posted is indicating some aspects recently but TBH I don't think he understands the fighting problems.Notwithstanding all the details, the Russians are moving forwards, which everyone thought they would on day 1.
Depressing, but even when the bulk of western arms arrive (July, I heard on US news), I'm not optimistic.
The other aspect I forgot to mention more positive is when will Ukraine win?
What makes you think that? Haven't you noticed that no NATO country wants to get directly involved in the fighting? NO NATO COUNTRY. There could be more than the obvious reason behind that.
What do you think would happen if there was a NATO versus Russia war? Russia's deternent is much like most others - if seriously threatened as a country the nukes come out. Any war like that would have to assume they wouldn't be used. A bit risky. Russia has the same problem if it attacks one - risky. They have to assume things wont go that far. Seems to be a rather shaky way to run a world to me but that is how it is.
I haven't seen a description quite that bad for the R's - do you remember where from?Russia isn't able to produce high quality electronics. China is on the way to being able to supply them but they're years off yet. The main Russian tank plants are already shut down due to lack of supplies.
Theres a line of thinking that says that Russia has already burnt through so many tanks and that their reserve is so badly maintained (one estimate is only 10% of reserve tanks are fit for use) that they're starting to bring forward T64s, which are way out of date.
Attrition is a war that Russia can lose. Even if the war ended today it'll be a long time before Russia recovers to pre war levels.
I haven't seen a description quite that bad for the R's - do you remember where from?
TBH There seem to be too many "Ukraine is doing fine" inclined articles.
Ukraine is short of anti air defences, particularly for higher altitude/longer range. Will imports from the west actually help or will R just blow them up? https://www.newsweek.com/nato-anti-...-ukraine-losses-russia-invasion-s-300-1696924
T-64 tanks have been supplied for the pro-Russky forces in DOnbas, so there were probably quite a few lurking about. 125mm gun has a range of 4km, the same as a US Abrams. Still handy. https://www.military-today.com/tanks/t64.htm