It depends what you mean by right.
There are no facts for leaving.
I agree. But what one can do is to examine closely the various claims and warnings from both sides. In doing so, it is highly probable that some distortions, myths and misrepresentations will be discovered. Also the lack of what is presented can be a good indicator. Often bland statements without supporting evidence, or sometimes even in the face of contrary evidence, can be a persuasive factor
Assuming I KNEW all the facts, I could vote to remain for personal reasons while believing it was not the best for the country (or.vice versa).
I think it's impossible for any one person to know all the facts. But as alluded to above, some research provides some powerful arguments, whichever way you are inclined, and depending on your own situation, fears, prejudices, hopes, ambitions, etc.
This is likely what big business is doing.
Do you think they are being altruistic, either nationally or continentally?
They will argue that their and the country's prosperity go hand in hand but this is not necessarily the case, is it?.
See how you've just thrown in "big business" as if it's a given. That's a misrepresentation.
Possibly business and individuals are considering their own prosperity. But I'd rather listen to an argument presented on prosperity, even if it is the prosperity of business, rather than listen to an argument from the likes of Farage or BJ, which they are more likely to be presented based on their personal fears or prejudices.
As I said, one can make one's own judgement using the processes, experiences and wishes for the future.
Just as there are some politicians who are obviously spouting nonsense and misrepresentation, not all politicians are hell-bent on personal grandiosement. Some businesses, politicians and scholars genuinely believe that Remain is the better option all round. In addition, some international eminent people, who have nothing to gain, have argued that to Remain is the better option.
Waves of cheap labour with nowhere to live may not be good for Britain.
You see how you've off-handedly connected cheap labour and scarcity of accommodation, as if either were a given. That's misrepresentation. Or, no doubt, you'll argue that it is the truth, the truth according to EFLImpudence?
Who knows? Perhaps a high wage economy would be better.
Again you've misrepresented the situation by presenting an either or scenario. There's every chance that neither of those scenarios will be evident, and the situation will be entirely different.
It's no different than belonging to an expensive professional club; it may seem advantageous to belong but leaving may result in you being personally better off. How do you decide and whom do you believe when it's been like that for so long?
Excuse the repitition:
But as alluded to above, some research provides some powerful arguments, whichever way you are inclined, and depending on your own situation, fears, prejudices, hopes, ambitions, etc.