Shamima was smuggled in by WESTERN inteligence!

[Pat ex]

Apparently Notch is by saying it was illegal. again, they are not arguing the revocation was illegal. They are asking for the decision to be reconsidered. Its worth remembering there is a lot of confidential information surrounding this that the Home Secretary was briefed on.

If the Home Secretary did not follow all the correct protocol and procedures, taking into account all relevant information, then it might have been illegal. We'll have to wait and see.

Her legal team are clutching at a straw, by saying she may have been trafficked and using this for the basis of the appeal [to the court of public opinion]. Odd that in all this time and all the hearings, she has never made this claim, nor has her legal team explored it. A sixth form legal student would know this, if true would have been the best angle to explore.

You have conveniently forgotten that her access to her legal team has been severely restricted,

 

[just pumps]

Now what is your problem?

Simples, you dont or wont understand that I only aired my opinion and asked if anybody else had watched a TV program. I am really starting to wonder if perhaps you carry a torch for her.

 

[Pat ex]

No, it comes down to the fact that Bangladesh told her to **** off.

If UK can deprive someone of their citizenship, any other government can just as easily deny someone their first passport.
In many countries having a passport is not a right, but a privilege endowed by the government on their say so, and no-one else's.

 

[mattylad]

Put simply, she's a munter and we don't want her back.
She's a fugly terrorist supporter who was happy to see our soldiers killed in barbaric ways so IMO she ought not be allowed back except to accept a stoning with big rocks.

 

[Harry Bloomfield]

Put simply, she's a munter and we don't want her back.
She's a fugly terrorist supporter who was happy to see our soldiers killed in barbaric ways so IMO she ought not be allowed back except to accept a stoning with big rocks.

I'll bring the big rocks.

 

[^woody^]

Put simply, she's a munter and we don't want her back.

LOL

But have you seen the latest pics? Looks like she's had a makeover and an image consultant, and seems a bit more western - probably to help with the sympathy vote.

Still not western enough though

 

[^woody^]

Didn't it say something like "full and final" on her rejection letter.

If she had any sense, she'd be on a dingy crossing the channel - with no documents and an Albanian accent.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Put simply, she's a munter and we don't want her back.
She's a fugly terrorist supporter who was happy to see our soldiers killed in barbaric ways so IMO she ought not be allowed back except to accept a stoning with big rocks.

Dont want her back.

But dont agree with the stoning part. No intention of sinking to the levels of terrorists, nor sharia law.

 

[IT Minion]

She was a child when she was groomed and went to Syria.

She had no other citizenship other than British. She's our problem to deal with. If you don't think we should deal with our own criminals how on earth can you demand other countries take theirs when we want to shop them back.

 

[Notch7]

Put simply, she's a munter and we don't want her back.
She's a fugly terrorist supporter who was happy to see our soldiers killed in barbaric ways so IMO she ought not be allowed back except to accept a stoning with big rocks.

not sure id call her a munter

 

[Notch7]

No, it comes down to the fact that Bangladesh told her to **** off.

whether Bangladesh would take her back or not was not considered in the court case

 

[just pumps]

She was a child when she was groomed and went to Syria.

Not sure with groomed but brain washed by video clips yes.

 

[motorbiking]

I think it is illegal.

It is not legal to remove somebodies citizenship if it renders them stateless.

The measure could only be imposed on Shamima Begum because her parents are of Bangladeshi descent and so she could be eligible to apply for Bangladeshi nationality.

Proving Bangladeshi citizenship is complex and comes down to rather thin arguments.

And Bangladesh stated it would refuse Begum entry into Bangladesh because she is not a citizen…..which to to indicates she could never apply for citizenship.

illegal under what law?

 

[motorbiking]

If the Home Secretary did not follow all the correct protocol and procedures, taking into account all relevant information, then it might have been illegal. We'll have to wait and see.


You have conveniently forgotten that her access to her legal team has been severely restricted,

Oh you are having a laugh.. she has access to better legal representation than the vast majority of British Citizen could expect. Her team is huge, some of the best, her case is well funded and they have tried every possible angle.

Again, nobody is arguing the Home Secretary did not follow all the correct protocols and procedures. That has been ruled on. Did you read the Supreme Court ruling?

 

[Notch7]

illegal under what law?

The Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act of 2002 now allows any British citizen, naturalised or citizen from birth, to be deprived of citizenship where the Secretary of State is satisfied that “the person has done anything seriously prejudicial to the vital interests” of the UK.[2] However this cannot be done when that person was a UK citizen from birth and would be rendered stateless by this deprivation

Shamima Begum was a UK citizen at birth and is rendered stateless.