Shamima was smuggled in by WESTERN inteligence!

[Notch7]

Shamima Bagum was groomed and sexually exploited, yet people think she should be punished.

but nobody is saying girls in Rotherham who were groomed, should be punished

Shamima Begum: What does the perfect victim look like?

Following a Times article that describes Shamima Begum as “bloodthirsty and fanatical” sexual violence trainer and campaigner Sara Amanda asks why is grooming and vulnerability no…

mediadiversified.org

 

[fillyboy]

Shamima Bagum was groomed and sexually exploited, yet people think she should be punished.

but nobody is saying girls in Rotherham who were groomed, should be punished

Shamima Begum: What does the perfect victim look like?

Following a Times article that describes Shamima Begum as “bloodthirsty and fanatical” sexual violence trainer and campaigner Sara Amanda asks why is grooming and vulnerability no…

mediadiversified.org

Were the 'Rotherham girls' terrorists?

 

[gant]

The 'rotherham girls' got doused in petrol, hung over balconies by their ankles, pregnancies terminated, their families intimidated and if all else fails went missing.
One sick puppy that notch.

 

[Harry Bloomfield]

Shamima Bagum was groomed and sexually exploited, yet people think she should be punished.

but nobody is saying girls in Rotherham who were groomed, should be punished

An entirely different form of grooming and an entirely different outcome.

 

[Notch7]

An entirely different form of grooming and an entirely different outcome.

It was exactly the same grooming.

“Shamima talks about her desire to have a family several times, and how travelling to Syria had fulfilled her aspirations in this respect. Shamima did not travel to Syria to fight, this child travelled with the expectation of ‘marrying’. She was not groomed for war, she was groomed for sex”

Shamima Begum: Children, Grooming and Consent - FACES Luton | Faiths Against Child Sexual Exploitation

This week, the Times published an article which documented the story of Shamima Begum, one of the three 15-year-old girls from Britain who travelled together to Syria around 4 years ago. The journalist, Anthony Loyd, had traced Shamima to a refugee camp in Syria. Heavily pregnant at the time of...

faces.org.uk

 

[mattylad]

Notch, you are one sick bast ard,,,

bringing the girls in rotherham into this.

 

[Notch7]

The 'rotherham girls' got doused in petrol, hung over balconies by their ankles, pregnancies terminated, their families intimidated and if all else fails went missing.
One sick puppy that notch.

You are the sick puppy.

You poor thing, you can’t take facts.


Shamima Begum was groomed in exactly the same way

Shamima Begum: Children, Grooming and Consent - FACES Luton | Faiths Against Child Sexual Exploitation

This week, the Times published an article which documented the story of Shamima Begum, one of the three 15-year-old girls from Britain who travelled together to Syria around 4 years ago. The journalist, Anthony Loyd, had traced Shamima to a refugee camp in Syria. Heavily pregnant at the time of...

faces.org.uk

 

[noseall]

Notch, you are one sick bast ard,,,

bringing the girls in rotherham into this.

Nonsense.
Grooming is abhorrent where ever it occurs and should be highlighted, even if you snowflakes haven't the stomach for it. You rather it was ignored, boyo?

 

[Notch7]

Notch, you are one sick bast ard,,,

bringing the girls in rotherham into this.

There is no end to the hypocrisy of people like you.


Shamima Begum was groomed in exactly the same way. Begum was forcibly married at 15 and forced to have sex with her “husband” Under age sex is statutory rape.


but hey people like you are so easily brainwashed by the Daily Mail.

what a sheep you are

 

[Odds]

There is no end to the hypocrisy of people like you.


Shamima Begum was groomed in exactly the same way. Begum was forcibly married at 15 and forced to have sex with her “husband” Under age sex is statutory rape.


but hey people like you are so easily brainwashed by the Daily Mail.

what a sheep you are

Nobody forced her to watch Islamist videos online. Nobody forced her to steal her mother's credit card to buy tickets to Istanbul.
She willingly went to Syria to volunteer her services to ISIS.
She was of an age when she was responsible for her actions and fully aware of the concept of right or wrong.
All she can do now is appeal to bleeding hearts to help her out of the sticky mess she's made of her life.

 

[Notch7]

Nobody forced her to watch Islamist videos online. Nobody forced her to steal her mother's credit card to buy tickets to Istanbul.
She willingly went to Syria to volunteer her services to ISIS.
She was of an age when she was responsible for her actions and fully aware of the concept of right or wrong.
All she can do now is appeal to bleeding hearts to help her out of the sticky mess she's made of her life.

You seem confused, do you not understand how grooming works?

 

[Odds]

You seem confused, do you not understand how grooming works?

i have a feeling you want to explain. Feel free to paint a picture.

 

[motorbiking]

The Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act of 2002 now allows any British citizen, naturalised or citizen from birth, to be deprived of citizenship where the Secretary of State is satisfied that “the person has done anything seriously prejudicial to the vital interests” of the UK.[2] However this cannot be done when that person was a UK citizen from birth and would be rendered stateless by this deprivation

Shamima Begum was a UK citizen at birth and is rendered stateless.

A quick summary of what happened:
Sajid Javid then Home Secretary wrote to begum 19-feb-19 telling her her citizenship was revoked. His right to do so is in Sec 40 British Nationality Act 1981. Because some of the info which guided him was secret, her appeal process would be with Special Immigration Appeals Commission (“SIAC”), under section 2B of the Special Immigration Appeals Commission Act 1997, rather than the 1st tier tribunal.
In May she applied to return to the UK to fight the removal. That was refused 19-Jun-2019
Her appeal was based on 3 things: did the revocation make her stateless, did refusing her a right to return to the UK breach her human rights and could she have a fair appeal from Syria. SIAC grouped all those together and ruled on the first 2 points that her appeal was dismissed and that only her leave to return should proceed to appeal, but that should also be dismissed. 7-Feb-2020. She appealed to the court of appeal and on 16-Jul-20, they over ruled SIAC and said her right to return appeal should proceed. They also allowed her appeal on Judicial review on the basis that the Home Secretary's policy had been deviated from. The Home Secretary appealed to the Supreme Court and 26-Feb-21, they ruled the court of appeal had errored and overturned the ruling on her right to leave to enter the UK.

So you can see the whole "she was made stateless" thing was put to bed early in the process. SIAC ruled she was not made stateless, court of appeal only ruled on her right to return to fight the appeal and Supreme Court also confirmed that Home Secretary had not acted outside the law.

It is common ground that the revocation did not make her stateless. It is irrelevant, what Bangladesh says, if they don't like the fact she had a right to Bangladeshi citizenship, they should change their laws.

 

[Notch7]

i have a feeling you want to explain. Feel free to paint a picture.

Your bias is not my responsibility.

 

[Pat ex]

Simples, you dont or wont understand that I only aired my opinion and asked if anybody else had watched a TV program. I am really starting to wonder if perhaps you carry a torch for her.

And I aired my opinion, and because it differs with yours, and because I pointed out your opinion had no validity in British Justice, it appears to have upset you.
So you've resorted to ridiculous allegations. That also illustrates the fallibility of your argument.