Should Boris return?

[Pat ex]

Surveys and 'analysis' count for feck all. That’s not 'official' figures. Have another try.

Your attempt at insulting our intelligence was predictable and predicted.
It's a shame you didn't read all of my post.

And please don't insult our intelligence by asking for 'official figures'. I've already said the ballot paper did not ask for such democratic data.
The 'official' figures are the numerous analyses.

 

[blup]

More a case of grabbing the first available seat. His country needs him.

All those extra seats and cost to the taxpayer for his retinue/security. Ex PM's who make millions should have a set upper limit before they have to pay for security.

Boris may well get back in through a members vote, but will drag this country's name deeper into the mud.

Blup

 

[carmanmemoranda]

you used the word Mostly ??

why not the word entirely ??

what out side issues ??

quite simple.

very little of any problem can be laid at the door of 1 issue or source. It is usually a combination.

So I am not dismissing other issues. But it's MOSTLY self inflicted

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Tranny is a troll and posts semi-literate nonsense for his own entertainment.

It has to be for himself. It doesn't entertain anybody else.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

( terchnically no one)

a person is asked by the king to form a government ,

the king can also refuse to accept a PMs resignation

when was the last time that happened ?

 

[ajohn]

The Sunday Times has tweeted that Johnson and Sunak are meeting soon. Should have been this morning.

Maybe you can remember who owns that paper.

 

[transam]

when was the last time that happened ?

Not aware that it ever has

Unless you know different

Got a problem with what I said take it up with the constitutional expert who was on any questions last night

Or you can make a complaint to the BBC as he was on the prog at there behest in order to “specifically” answer these types of questions

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Not aware that it ever has

Unless you know different

Got a problem with what I said take it up with the constitutional expert who was on any questions last night

Or you can make a complaint to the BBC as he was on the prog at there behest in order to “specifically” answer these types of questions

So it wasn't really relevant ?

 

[fillyboy]

Your attempt at insulting our intelligence was predictable and predicted.

 

[transam]

So it wasn't really relevant ?

Depends what you mean by relevant

Obviously it’s not relevant to you but than again do I care

Got a complaint or gripe ask the BBC about its relevance not me

 

[JohnD]

Surveys and 'analysis' count for feck all. That’s not 'official' figures. Have another try.

Mottie has been shown something he doesn't want to see.

If he closes his eyes, will it go away?

No.

It would be entertaining to see him try to show that there is a majority of under-60s that are Brexers.

There isn't.

 

[Mottie]

Mottie has been shown something he doesn't want to see.

If he closes his eyes, will it go away?

No.

It would be entertaining to see him try to show that there is a majority of under-60s that are Brexers.

There isn't.

You don’t know and neither do I so stop the pretence.

 

[JohnD]

You don’t know and neither do I so stop the pretence.

Shutting your eyes to the truth will not make it go away.

The Brexer generation of bitter old men like yourself is dwindling.

 

[Mottie]

Shutting your eyes to the truth will not make it go away.

Making up statements and posting them on here does not make them true.

 

[JohnD]

You'd better try to stop.