Thanks for all the help, I didn't that a cooker switch could be used - makes sense I guess, after all it's just an isolator. Many thanks for all the help.
That would depend upon the size and routing of the cable - your electrician will be able to advise.I've been speaking with the electrician who fitted it and he advised me that the manufacturers do not make a 45amp MCB. Thisa was why he fitted a 40amp one instead. ... I want to know if a 50amp MCB can be used instead of a 40/45amp one?
People will argue about how crucial it is to follow manufacturer's instructions to the letter (the regulations are changing nect year to give electricians more discretion in that respect). However, speaking personally, I think that (assuming the cable could support it) to have a 50A MCB would be the lesser of the evils than having an (under-sized) 40A one.The shower guide says a 45amp MCB should be used but if this is not available, can a 50 amp one be used instead?
Whilst that is true when installing in the first place, it is not going to make any difference to this situation as the current drawn by the shower is not going to be any different than it is now.That would depend upon the size and routing of the cable - your electrician will be able to advise.
Agreed.People will argue about how crucial it is to follow manufacturer's instructions to the letter (the regulations are changing nect year to give electricians more discretion in that respect). However, speaking personally, I think that (assuming the cable could support it) to have a 50A MCB would be the lesser of the evils than having an (under-sized) 40A one.
Despite the feelings of you and I, I suspect that that many electricians (including those undertaking EICRs) will think solely in terms of "In ≤ Iz ≤ Ib" (per 433.1.1), rather than 433.3.1(ii), and therefore would not be happy with In being greater than Iz of the cable ... but maybe I'm wrong in suspecting that!Whilst that is true when installing in the first place, it is not going to make any difference to this situation as the current drawn by the shower is not going to be any different than it is now.That would depend upon the size and routing of the cable - your electrician will be able to advise.
They may but that would be lack of knowledge.Despite the feelings of you and I, I suspect that that many electricians (including those undertaking EICRs) will think solely in terms of "In ≤ Iz ≤ Ib" (per 433.1.1), rather than 433.3.1(ii), and therefore would not be happy with In being greater than Iz of the cable ... but maybe I'm wrong in suspecting that!Whilst that is true when installing in the first place, it is not going to make any difference to this situation as the current drawn by the shower is not going to be any different than it is now.That would depend upon the size and routing of the cable - your electrician will be able to advise.
Yes, perhaps I should not have made the distinction.BTW, I'm not sure why you make an exception of "installing in the first place" - one could surely invoke 433.3.1(ii) even then, if one were so inclined, couldn't one?
Perhaps - or maybe they have a different judgement as to whether a shower could create an overload.They may but that would be lack of knowledge.Despite the feelings of you and I, I suspect that that many electricians (including those undertaking EICRs) will think solely in terms of "In ≤ Iz ≤ Ib" (per 433.1.1), rather than 433.3.1(ii), and therefore would not be happy with In being greater than Iz of the cable ... but maybe I'm wrong in suspecting that!
I'm still not sure that I see any real difference between 'then' and 'now'.Yes, perhaps I should not have made the distinction. ... I just meant that when installing initially the method of installation and derating factors would be considered but it is not going to make any difference now whether In is increased as the current drawn is going to be as it has always been ...BTW, I'm not sure why you make an exception of "installing in the first place" - one could surely invoke 433.3.1(ii) even then, if one were so inclined, couldn't one?
That would depend upon the size and routing of the cable - your electrician will be able to advise.I've been speaking with the electrician who fitted it and he advised me that the manufacturers do not make a 45amp MCB. Thisa was why he fitted a 40amp one instead. ... I want to know if a 50amp MCB can be used instead of a 40/45amp one?
People will argue about how crucial it is to follow manufacturer's instructions to the letter (the regulations are changing nect year to give electricians more discretion in that respect). However, speaking personally, I think that (assuming the cable could support it) to have a 50A MCB would be the lesser of the evils than having an (under-sized) 40A one.The shower guide says a 45amp MCB should be used but if this is not available, can a 50 amp one be used instead?
Kind Regards, John
I suppose that some people who think very strictly might see an issue, and you could find a 50A isolator switch if you were really concerned.Thanks for that, but what about the 45amp isolator switch which is in place? If a 50amp mcb is fitted, could this not be dangerous as the isolator switch has a max rating of 45amps?
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local