Those over 80 are the most vulnerable ,so why the need to put the number at 40?Those over 40 are more vulnerable than those below....which was the point Trazor was making.
Are you over 40 John?
Those over 80 are the most vulnerable ,so why the need to put the number at 40?Those over 40 are more vulnerable than those below....which was the point Trazor was making.
Are you over 40 John?
Those over 80 are the most vulnerable
Those over 80 are the most vulnerable
95% of people who got covid, have gotten better WITHOUT MEDICAL INTERVENTION!!! The vaccine MAY prevent you from getting ill!! The vaccine WILL NOT stop you catching the virus... It WILL NOT stop you carrying it! It WILL NOT stop you infecting others! WHY THE TESTS? WHY THE PASSPORT? 95% of people who got Covid, got better WITHOUT MEDICAL INTERVENTION!!! WHY THE VACCINE???
Andy
The oldest age groups are the most vulnerable, so (on average) the 80+ are higher risk than the over 70, who are higher risk than over 60 etc. etc. etc.Wrong, what nutjob YouTube channel are you getting that one from?
Yes that's how I understand it as well.Yeah, I meant, with the vaccine the hope is that there won't be so many mutations as the virus will be killed off quicker. I was under the impression that with the vaccine there was less chance of the virus mutating. But as I said maybe I've read it wrong, or the information has changed, it does seem to change on a daily basis
Do you know what the mortality stats are for people 30 - 40 and 40 - 50?The oldest age groups are the most vulnerable, so (on average) the 80+ are higher risk than the over 70, who are higher risk than over 60 etc. etc. etc.
So drawing a line at any age and saying that those that are over it are more at risk than those below is probably going to be right. Not interesting, but probably right.
John's probably trying to say that the absolute risk for the 40-50 group is fairly low, which it is. Still worryingly high but much less than the 80+ group where something like 20% of those who catch Covid-19 die.
I had an argument with my brother-in-law about this today, he was angry/disgusted even that we might have to sign in to pubs and restaurants. I pointed out a holiday that we all went on as two families a couple of years ago, it was all inclusive and every time you either got a drink or food, you had to either give your name and room number or show your wrist band, he was not bothered by that oddly enough?
So what ever is right is not interesting you say?The oldest age groups are the most vulnerable, so (on average) the 80+ are higher risk than the over 70, who are higher risk than over 60 etc. etc. etc.
So drawing a line at any age and saying that those that are over it are more at risk than those below is probably going to be right. Not interesting, but probably right.
John's probably trying to say that the absolute risk for the 40-50 group is fairly low, which it is. Still worryingly high but much less than the 80+ group where something like 20% of those who catch Covid-19 die.
The vaccine doesn’t stop the transmission of the virus neither does it stop somebody catching the virus.Yes that's how I understand it as well. With vaccines in place there are less contagion and less virus infection so less likelihood that variations will arise so simply put vaccinations equals less contagion and less variations
Unless someone is over 80 or obese or already has underlying health issues the chances of death from Covid are less than 1%Do you know what the mortality stats are for people 30 - 40 and 40 - 50? Would like to know them if you do?
The vaccine doesn’t stop the transmission of the virus neither does it stop somebody catching the virus.
Does it reduce the "transmissibility" and does it decrease the chances of catching the virus?The vaccine doesn’t stop the transmission of the virus neither does it stop somebody catching the virus.
Does it reduce the "transmissibility" and does it decrease the chances of catching the virus?