Any of 'those sorts of things' (at least in the ways so far mentioned), would usually only be meaningful to the person who did it - in which case one can adopt whatever approach one wants, so long as it does not violate existing standards/conventions. My personal convention, when there is both P/L and S/L in a cable, has always been to use the brown (or, previously, red), without any additional identification as the P/L - not the least because, if I did otherwise and wanted whole-house consistency, I would have to go around 'identifying' all the permanent Ls as such!If you are going to do this sort of thing, I think it would be more appropriate to identify the permanent line(s). I just used to use a permanent marker.
With that convention, then, other than with 'twin brown' (or, previously, 'twin red'), there should not really be a need for any additional over-sleeving to identify a conductor as a switched L - since, if the brown (or red) is always used as the P/L, then anything which has been over-sleeved in brown (or red) is, by implication, a S/L.
In any event, this is all, at most, a matter of slight 'convenience' - since, if/when one ever needs to know which of two conductors is P/L and which is S/L, it only takes a few seconds to determine that by testing.
Kind Regards, John