Syphilis

Be that as it may be or may not be

But the user will pay a heavy price
Not necessarily they'll be back on public transport. District heating will make a return, boilers done away with at a stroke, all in name of saving the planet of course.
 
Sponsored Links
Valid points but should Joe bloggs at home be allowed to work on these systems ?

You have to be registered to work on electric and gas, but anybody can work on a car (or lorry). I get to see some of that work. It's scary.

Scary ??

You should see some of the work by reg gas and electrical trades

Mind you concerns were raised ref the self build car market which is pretty big in the UK

Hence the SVA regs that were brought in which are pretty stringent

Mind you there are the post SVA parts you put on the car after the actual SVA test
I.e
Wheel spinners
Removable hoods for cobras
In my case the actual windscreen

And various other parts that would not get through the SVA test
 
Good job none of that happened then...
I guess you won't be taking any notice of this then...

Linky Linky

"The risk of contracting long COVID may have been exaggerated due to flawed research, leading to unnecessarily high levels of anxiety about suffering from it, a new study has suggested.

"Major flaws" in the literature on the condition likely exaggerated the true threat of contracting it, the new research argues"

"researchers from the UK, along with Denmark and the USA, say "many scientific publications" overestimated the prevalence of long COVID because of "overly broad definitions, lack of control groups, inappropriate control groups, and other methodological flaws"

"The research team said this lack of definition could end up leading to an increase in healthcare spending and more anxiety, as well as misdiagnoses and a diversion of funds."

Mind you apparently 'brain fog' is more prevalent amongst those who won't accept that the reaction to the 'virus' was OTT and are anxious about any 'symptom' they think they might have ;)
 
Sponsored Links
Your link is not to a scientific source, but to an entertainment article by Sky News (FFS)

So, no.
tbf...

Published in the British Medical Journal's Evidence-Based Medicine, the new paper looked at the definition of the condition by several global health organisations - including the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and the World Health Organisation (WHO).

The study argues none of the definitions "requires a causal link" to COVID-19 infection, adding any symptoms that happen after a confirmed or suspected infection could be considered consistent with long COVID.

Research in the future should include properly matched groups, the paper added, as well as "sufficient" follow-up time following infection.
Dr Jacobs said a survey by the Office for National Statistics (ONS), which was discontinued in March, found that 1.9 million people in the UK had long COVID.
 
I guess you won't be taking any notice of this then
No I won’t be taking notice of your out of context quote

hers a bit you missed out

"Long COVID simply didn't exist four years ago, so researchers have had to get to grips with a new and challenging topic at top speed.

"It is, therefore, not surprising that different studies have different estimates of the prevalence of long COVID, as studies have used different case definitions, different populations etc."

Dr Jacobs said a survey by the Office for National Statistics (ONS), which was discontinued in March, found that 1.9 million people in the UK had long COVID.

He said this was a "staggeringly high" number.

"We don't know how long those people will remain ill," he added. "If we are lucky, most of them will be healthy again within a year or two.

"If we are unlucky, a large number of them may have a permanent disability."



poor Ellal, failing once more
 
I guess you won't be taking any notice of this then...

Linky Linky

"The risk of contracting long COVID may have been exaggerated due to flawed research, leading to unnecessarily high levels of anxiety about suffering from it, a new study has suggested.

"Major flaws" in the literature on the condition likely exaggerated the true threat of contracting it, the new research argues"

"researchers from the UK, along with Denmark and the USA, say "many scientific publications" overestimated the prevalence of long COVID because of "overly broad definitions, lack of control groups, inappropriate control groups, and other methodological flaws"

"The research team said this lack of definition could end up leading to an increase in healthcare spending and more anxiety, as well as misdiagnoses and a diversion of funds."

Mind you apparently 'brain fog' is more prevalent amongst those who won't accept that the reaction to the 'virus' was OTT and are anxious about any 'symptom' they think they might have ;)
What are you trying to prove?

That nobody should have had the vaccine ? Too late.

If you don't want it, don't have it.

But give over.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top