Not necessarily they'll be back on public transport. District heating will make a return, boilers done away with at a stroke, all in name of saving the planet of course.Be that as it may be or may not be
But the user will pay a heavy price
Not necessarily they'll be back on public transport. District heating will make a return, boilers done away with at a stroke, all in name of saving the planet of course.Be that as it may be or may not be
But the user will pay a heavy price
Valid points but should Joe bloggs at home be allowed to work on these systems ?
You have to be registered to work on electric and gas, but anybody can work on a car (or lorry). I get to see some of that work. It's scary.
That's how it works give them enough rope to hang themselves.Scary ??
You should see some of the work by reg gas and electrical trades
I guess you won't be taking any notice of this then...Good job none of that happened then...
I guess you won't be taking any notice of this then...
tbf...Your link is not to a scientific source, but to an entertainment article by Sky News (FFS)
So, no.
No I won’t be taking notice of your out of context quoteI guess you won't be taking any notice of this then
I think they say statistics can be seen any which way you like.Are they saying that the statistics are wrong???
So my cat does have 3x legs?I think they say statistics can be seen any which way you like.
So my cat does have 3x legs?
I cannot say. I have not seen your pussy.So my cat does have 3x legs?
Published in
I presume the sub-editor's cat took a look at it before taking a leak.Does not, of course, imply "endorsed by."
What are you trying to prove?I guess you won't be taking any notice of this then...
Linky Linky
"The risk of contracting long COVID may have been exaggerated due to flawed research, leading to unnecessarily high levels of anxiety about suffering from it, a new study has suggested.
"Major flaws" in the literature on the condition likely exaggerated the true threat of contracting it, the new research argues"
"researchers from the UK, along with Denmark and the USA, say "many scientific publications" overestimated the prevalence of long COVID because of "overly broad definitions, lack of control groups, inappropriate control groups, and other methodological flaws"
"The research team said this lack of definition could end up leading to an increase in healthcare spending and more anxiety, as well as misdiagnoses and a diversion of funds."
Mind you apparently 'brain fog' is more prevalent amongst those who won't accept that the reaction to the 'virus' was OTT and are anxious about any 'symptom' they think they might have