Syrians

What do you think the U.K. govt can do to stop people leaving France in small boats or removing them once they arrive here?

I just wonder why you blame the British govt for people leaving the French coast.
Eh?

What?!?

I said THIS:

however I tend to lay the blame more at those in power

Since when did the phrase 'those in power' just refer to one government in one country, unless referred to as such?

Still not got it?

I'm referring to those in power in a GLOBAL sense.
 
Sponsored Links
Show me where @Brigadier made a racist comment ?
I’ll be waiting….
Yet again you're deliberately confusing the issue.
Or you are genuinely confused your self.
I think the former is more accurate.

Here's how the conversation went:
Regan doesn't THINK that : he's not stupid.
A racist bigot and sh!t stirrer yes, but not stupid.
Nigel Fromage, if you'd ordered him from Temu. (y)
I don’t think he is, it’s just a decent bit of banter.
There's nothing decent about consistent racist innuendos.
You asked me to justify my comment in relation to Brigadier when it was obvious you were not referring to Brigadier, and neither was I.

You've even recognised it yourself a few minutes later.
I was laughing at the Fromage part, that’s why I posted it.
You were really are a thoroughly disgusting individual.
You can't even follow your own illogical comments.
 
I can now understand why people refuse to engage with you and call you a troll.
You intentionally conflate several issues, trying to confuse the other party to avoid being shown as an idiot.

You originally asked JohnD for a link to support his suggestion that the young black lad was incarcerated in Saudi Arabia for underage sex was because he was black. That was in the thread called Tough Justice. Here are the comments:




Then much later JohnD gave his opinion of filly's obsession with brown-skinned people.
You called JohnD a liar and then accused him of not supplying a link connected with his opinion, that you had asked for previously. You hadn't asked for any such link previously
Here are the few posts, in this thread, where you confused yourself by conflating two entirely different issues:




You're confusing yourself with your twists and wriggling.
You accuse others of lying when you have confused yourself.
You're a thoroughly disgusting individual.
You can’t be this thick surely ?

I asked John for the proof as a way to say he always plays the race card, referring to the Tough Justice thread, post 10

As a way to show John’s a one trick pony.

You seem to have a real issue admitting you got the wrong end of the stick “Again”

I think my posts my be a little too subtle for you old bean.
 
Yet again you're deliberately confusing the issue.
Or you are genuinely confused your self.
I think the former is more accurate.

Here's how the conversation went:



You asked me to justify my comment in relation to Brigadier when it was obvious you were not referring to Brigadier, and neither was I.

You've even recognised it yourself a few minutes later.

You were really are a thoroughly disgusting individual.
You can't even follow your own illogical comments.
The Fromage comment isn’t racists, I liked the Temu part of it.

Good job I’m not actually a Troll, or this would have been too easy.
 
Sponsored Links
I have and I do watch BBC News stuff, and I can't find it anywhere. I'm convinced it does not exist on BBC News.
And you've just made another refusal to provide a link to a picture which you presented as an argument.
If you are content to present unverifiable images to support whatever argument you wish to make, go ahead.
You can safely claim that you meet the criteria for joining QAnon. :rolleyes:
Ha Ha HAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.

I can safely say I've never posted anything on here I don't believe to be true.

I can also safely say (again) that I won't be wasting my time to prove anything to you ;)

What I will say is this. If you've been watching any of the footage coming out of Syria (unless you think it's all fake?) much of it contains children in some shape or form. So my point stands i.e. what does the future hold for them, especially the girls.

I won't reply to you again on this, say hello to Pat Ex for me ... actually don't bother.
 
For the year ending June 2024, approximately 1.2 million people migrated to the United Kingdom, while 479,000 people migrated from the UK, resulting in a net migration figure of 728,000.

Not enough Holiday Inns for them all. :idea:
How many of those arrived through regular normal channels?

That is a decrease on last years figures. Labour policies working already.
This would have been in line with existing estimates of the previous year, ending June 2023, but the ONS issued a revision, substantially increasing last year’s figures from 740,000 to 906,000.
In light of these changes, net migration in the year to June 2024 is down 20 per cent from the previous year.

Brexit was going to make UK sovereign again, and close the borders. :ROFLMAO:
Since Britain left the EU, immigration to the UK has gone up, and has not come close to pre-Brexit levels.
:ROFLMAO:

The UK health service is bearing the brunt of the Brexit immigration policies.
In a time when the NHS and social care sectors are facing major staffing shortages, visas for health and care workers from abroad have dropped by 62 per cent.

In so far as small boat arrivals are concerned because they bear the brunt of the hatred and divisive abuse
About 15% of the total immigrants are granted leave to remain for Asylum and Humanitarian reasons.
Of these only about 34% are small boat arrivals.
So only about 60,000 of the immigrants to UK are small boat arrivals.
The remaining 1,150,000 are totally at the behest of the UK government.
But weirdly, it's always the people arriving by small boat a mere 5% of the total migration to UK, that are targeted for endless racist propaganda, from political sources and the UK public.
 
I asked John for the proof as a way to say he always plays the race card, referring to the Tough Justice thread, post 10
You asked JohnD for his source for where he heard that the black lad was incarcerated for being black.
You then later conflated that issue by asking JohnD for his source for his opinion that filly was obsessed with brown-skinned people, and you claimed that you had asked this of him before. You hadn't!
You are a disingenuine idiot who it appears sets out to intentionally wind people up with your hopping, skipping, jumping, wriggling and sidestepping.
I would refuse to work with you in a real situation because you probably act in a similar way in your trade, making mistakes , and blaming all and sundry for your mistakes.
That is why I describe you as a thoroughly disgusting individual. You are totally lacking in the slightest bit of integrity.
 
Ha Ha HAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.

I can safely say I've never posted anything on here I don't believe to be true.

I can also safely say (again) that I won't be wasting my time to prove anything to you ;)

What I will say is this. If you've been watching any of the footage coming out of Syria (unless you think it's all fake?) much of it contains children in some shape or form. So my point stands i.e. what does the future hold for them, especially the girls.

I won't reply to you again on this, say hello to Pat Ex for me ... actually don't bother.
Yet another point blank refusal to reveal your source of that image.
Did you make it yourself? :rolleyes:
I wouldn't dare to make an image, post it on a social media site and claim it was a genuine photo from such a trusted source as the BBC.
And then to flaty refuse to reveal your source. Have you no shame?
Obviously not, you think it's funny to post images and refuse to reveal your source.
 
Yet another point blank refusal to reveal your source of that image.
Did you make it yourself? :rolleyes:
I wouldn't dare to make an image, post it on a social media site and claim it was a genuine photo from such a trusted source as the BBC.
And then to flaty refuse to reveal your source. Have you no shame?
Obviously not, you think it's funny to post images and refuse to reveal your source.
Congrats, you're going on ignore ;)
 
You asked JohnD for his source for where he heard that the black lad was incarcerated for being black.
You then later conflated that issue by asking JohnD for his source for his opinion that filly was obsessed with brown-skinned people, and you claimed that you had asked this of him before. You hadn't!
You are a disingenuine idiot who it appears sets out to intentionally wind people up with your hopping, skipping, jumping, wriggling and sidestepping.
I would refuse to work with you in a real situation because you probably act in a similar way in your trade, making mistakes , and blaming all and sundry for your mistakes.
That is why I describe you as a thoroughly disgusting individual. You are totally lacking in the slightest bit of integrity.
Listen, we can all see you’ve confused my comments.

I’ve tried to clear it up, but because you’re in the wrong you keep digging! And it’s a mighty big hole now.

I’ll try again- My cross thread comment was made to take a swipe at John for making baseless accusations! One of which was in the other thread. I reminded him that he can’t back up his slurs.

Now if you’re not willing to accept that, well quite frankly I don’t give a dam.


But I hope you manage to calm down a little before your dinner.
 
That is why I describe you as a thoroughly disgusting individual. You are totally lacking in the slightest bit of integrity.
I’m not sure if I’m proud or if I feel a little sad you’re so bent out of shape!
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top