Syrians

Where did he say that?

Post No10
 
Sponsored Links
Instead you declared Denso's data to be out of date without really knowing if it was or wasn't.
It’s up to 2021, you’re a bright chap, you know we are almost in 2025.

So my comment “It’s out of date” is accurate and still stands.

Being the current version doesn’t mean it’s in date.

Keep up old bean.
 

Post No10
You're totally off your rocker.
JohnD was referring to the case of the young lad being incarcerated in Saudi Arabia for underage sex.
It was absolutely nothing to do with fillyboy's obsession with brown skinned people.
I've heard it suggested that the mother wanted revenge because the boy is black.
That comment has no relevance to the subsequent comments and your unfair accusation.
Filly is obsessed with brown-skinned people.
All you have to do is provided the evidence to back up where you “heard it”

In it’s absence you’re a liar. A liar who said it to stir racial tensions

I have reached the conclusion that you trot out nonsense words which you hope will make sense.
But they invariably don't.
 
It’s up to 2021, you’re a bright chap, you know we are almost in 2025.

So my comment “It’s out of date” is accurate and still stands.
Your comment was an off the cuff remark hoping to dispute the data.
Being the current version doesn’t mean it’s in date.
It absolutely does mean it's the most up to date data available.
The only way you can prove it's out of date is by finding more up to date data, which you refuse to do.
 
Sponsored Links
You're totally off your rocker.
JohnD was referring to the case of the young lad being incarcerated in Saudi Arabia for underage sex.
It was absolutely nothing to do with fillyboy's obsession with brown skinned people.

That comment has no relevance to the subsequent comments and your unfair accusation.



I have reached the conclusion that you trot out nonsense words which you hope will make sense.
But they invariably don't.
I was reminding JohnD he hasn’t provided me with the source.

You do conflate the issue old boy.

John’s one word reply proves it again
 
Your comment was an off the cuff remark hoping to dispute the data.

It absolutely does mean it's the most up to date data available.
The only way you can prove it's out of date is by finding more up to date data, which you refuse to do.
It’s the current version.

It’s not up to date.
 
I was reminding JohnD he hasn’t provided me with the source.

You do conflate the issue old boy.

John’s one word reply proves it again
You definitely were not reminding him that he hadn't provided you with the link you requested, other wise you would have posted in that thread.
You didn't, you intentionally cross-threaded the comments. Now you're trying to wriggle out of it, and cover your mistake.
 
Last edited:
It’s the current version.

It’s not up to date.
You said it was out of date!
So my comment “It’s out of date” is accurate and still stands.
It's the most up to date data available, therefore it's the current version for reference, until it is superseded by more up to date data, which you refuse to provide.
So to all intents and purposes it is not out of date. It won't be out of date until it's superseded.
 
You definitely were not reminding him that he hadn't provided you with the link you requested, other wise you would hav eposte din that thread.
You didn't, you intentionally cross-threaded the comments. Now you're trying to wriggle out of it, and cover your mistake.
In your opinion.

It’s common to mention other threads and waiting for a response in the GD.

Look into @Mottie asking @Notch7 to provide him with evidence of Mottie being racist.

The evidence hasn’t materialised yet!

I accept your apology for getting your wires crossed.
 
You said it was out of date!

It's the most up to date data available, therefore it's the current version for reference, until it is superseded by more up to date data, which you refuse to provide.
So to all intents and purposes it is not out of date. It won't be out of date until it's superseded.
It’s not up to date.

There’s data from 2021 - the present day.

Nice try!
 
That'll be a "no" then?
I did suspect it had been photoshopped, and not very well.
Go and watch some BBC News stuff, you might find the piece. I saw it this morning.

If you think I'm going to waste my time finding a link to the piece to placate you, you've got a long wait ;)

This is a GD section on a DIY forum, not a uni course or formal debating society.
 
Go and watch some BBC News stuff, you might find the piece. I saw it this morning.

If you think I'm going to waste my time finding a link to the piece to placate you, you've got a long wait ;)

This is a GD section on a DIY forum, not a uni course or formal debating society.
He’s just a poor man’s Troll

Troll-bot I believe he’s been called
 
Nonsense.

Build some more 4* hotels while they're at it.

Friend of mine is a car salesman in Bridgwater, Somerset. The top bod of their dealership group visits the Bridgwater dealership on a regular basis. Unfortunately the hotel he stayed in is now closed and full of spong migrants. Bearing in mind he's the head honcho, it's a fair bet it's not a cheap fleapit. We're paying for this lunacy and it's disrupting people's lives.
 
That's great in principle, but the problem is distinguishing the genuine needy from economic migrants, mostly male, who are happy to leave their women and children in supposedly dangerous places.
False argument.

Who says they are happy to leave their family behind…..oh it’s your opinion
And who says the women and children stay in a “dangerous place”…..they may be staying in refugee camps or Turkey, or elsewhere


By the way….maybe you should read up on the subject, then you would know the danger of travelling to the U.K. is more dangerous than staying where they are.


“One reason for the higher share of men among asylum seekers, in general, is the danger associated with irregular migration journeys. In many cases, female and minor family members join later through family reunification routes.”

 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top