- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 17,616
- Reaction score
- 2,422
- Country
Not even the cop who found it said he saw him throw it. That makes no sense whatsoever, if planted.You'd think so, perhaps they hadn't got all their ducks all in a row.
Not even the cop who found it said he saw him throw it. That makes no sense whatsoever, if planted.You'd think so, perhaps they hadn't got all their ducks all in a row.
Witness testaments concentrated on the gun being thrown away into the field
So why plant the gun in the field, much better for their case if he's found with a gun on him.If the rozzers didn't see the gun being launched, they'd expect he was still armed.
Even if they did see him lob it, they didn't know he wasn't otherwise armed.
There was no video evidence what we're debating is a reconstruction of witness statements.Which witness statements?
AFAIK, no-one claims to have witnessed this.
This is really the primary reason why the gun had to have been thrown by Duggan and not planted. If plod planted it, why in the field? It serves no benefit to them that it was in the field unless one of them said they saw him chuck it. Much better to tuck it under the body.So why plant the gun in the field, much better for their case if he's found with a gun on him.
Yes, quite.So why plant the gun in the field, much better for their case if he's found with a gun on him.
To me, this suggests as Duggan came out the car he appeared to be making towards the officer that shot him. Did this officer feel he was about to be attacked and shot accordingly?Something dodgy...You never shoot without a clear firing line as the people behind are just as much in the in the target zone as a person is in front of the target. Two people were inline with the target...the cab driver and the other officer....who was hit by the firing officer....hmmmmmm
Did he dispute Duggan was armed?The speaker at the meeting at the end was convinced lies had been told.
So why plant the gun in the field,
There was no video evidence what we're debating is a reconstruction of witness statements.
The speaker at the meeting at the end was convinced lies had been told.
Lol. You couldn't be more wrong.Personally, I have always thought that police who are attracted to the gun squad are probably the people you would least want in charge of guns.
'The' gun. Do scrotes only have one weapon these days?Didn't statements
So if he's thrown the gun away