The Next General Election

Status
Not open for further replies.
It means he won't provide disingenuous Tories with wild and untrue allegations.
Rather like the sort of allegations that are evident in here from the various culprits,
If I say I don't agree with hanging I'd be accused of being a rapist apologist. Such is the way of the likes of Lee Anderson and others of his ilk.
So he'll do what you've just done and spin the answer to my question to make it sound he's not the person carrying out the instruction of teaching our children about the deviations of sexual behavior.
 
Sponsored Links
So he'll do what you've just done and spin the answer to my question to make it sound he's not the person carrying out the instruction of teaching our children about the deviations of sexual behavior.
If you mean I'm not providing you with ammunition on which you build wild and disingenuous allegations, yes that's right.
As far as I know Keir is not teaching children about anything.
 
If he's elected as prime minister it'll be his government that decide what the schools teach. Or is that out of his hands and lies somewhere else where it's coming from.
 
Sponsored Links
If he's elected as prime minister it'll be his government that decide what the schools teach. Or is that out of his hands and lies somewhere else where it's coming from.
It's already in place, until, or unless he changes it

You are already trying to suggest he has already done this. It's the Tories that are currently in charge of education, and have been for the last 20 odd years. Why not challenge the Tories?
 
So you believe that and it'll be Starmer in control.
Silly questions, interesting comment.
Questions of opinion, I'll probably answer. But questions of fact that you can't be bothered to look up, and/or are designed to force the thread into your favored direction are IMO silly questions.

Prior to 1988, the curriculum was at the LA discretion. The Tories took it into their control.
Labour may return it to LA control, or they may not.

Maybe Charlie George might correct me. (Is he the ex-teacher?)
 
Last edited:
So you approve of the Tories education policies, but dislike what they are teaching?
The Tories are the other cheek of the same ar*se which I've explained numerous times but you do try to pigeon hole me for obvious reasons.
 
Questions of opinion, I'll probably answer. But questions of fact that you can't be bothered to look up, and/or are designed to force the thread into your favored direction are IMO silly questions.

Prior to 2014, the curriculum was at the LA discretion. The Tories took it into their control.
Labour may return it to LA control, or they may not.
I think you'd do well too glance in the mirror from time to time.
 
The Tories are the other cheek of the same ar*se which I've explained numerous times but you do try to pigeon hole me for obvious reasons.
So why suggest Starmer is the 1 teaching the kids what you don't want them to?

He isn't in charge, Sunak is.

If you were complaining that Sunak was teaching them wrong and that Starmer might not change it, then you might, just, have a point.
 
So why suggest Starmer is the 1 teaching the kids what you don't want them to?

He isn't in charge, Sunak is.

If you were complaining that Sunak was teaching them wrong and that Starmer might not change it, then you might, just, have a point.
I think your a bit muxed up again and not understood a word ive said.
 
I agree with that but on the other hand do you want a leader who doesn't know the difference between a man and a woman.

Keir Starmer can, it’s you that are confused.

You won’t be able to explain the difference between a man and a woman.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Back
Top