They Shoot Horses, don't they?

[blup]

You are just avoiding the issue now. No one mentioned lecturing the Swiss.

I mentioned them in response to your question, if I'm not giving the answer you want, sorry. Its not the spanish inquisition.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

If that is your definition of assisted dying, it is already lawful under palliative care. Denso, has confirmed, he perceived "generous" dosing to achieve a swift painless end, without discussion with the dying person. In my own experience, it was discussed.

I'm not disagreeing with it

It was a welcome blessing for my mother, who was begging to be out of pain.

But it was assisted dying, no matter how you dress it up

 

[denso13]

if I'm not giving the answer you want

You are not giving any answers, just waffle and obfuscation.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

I mentioned them in response to your question, if I'm not giving the answer you want, sorry. Its not the spanish inquisition.

What's wrong with having the choice?

You never answer that

 

[denso13]

What's wrong with having the choice?

He says you have the choice already. Go to Switzerland.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

He says you have the choice already.

Not in UK, where we live, we don't.

It's a very simple question that deserves an answer.

What is wrong with having a choice ?

 

[carmanmemoranda]

You are not giving any answers, just waffle and obfuscation.

Promoting suffering, but accepting people will travel miles and at great expense to get their chosen path

 

[motorbiking]

Maybe not, but subjected to months/years of not knowing if they would be charged? - yes!

Have you no compassion?

I think the answer to that question is obvious!

DPP has guidance the only issue is being interviewed by police

 

[motorbiking]

Not in UK, where we live, we don't.

It's a very simple question that deserves an answer.

What is wrong with having a choice ?

You have the ability to legally take your own life in the U.K. to make that illegal (and it used to be) is nonsense.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

You have the ability to legally take your own life in the U.K. to make that illegal (and it used to be) is nonsense.

Mr swerve

Why don't you just stick to the subject.

 

[motorbiking]

It’s the whole friggin point. Today you can:
- find a way to painlessly take your own life any time you want
- get lots of drugs to help you in your final hours of life.

This bill seems to be a hybrid of abortion law and divorce law. It’s misses the objective.

I see no value in a high court judge from the family law courts having oversight of medical experts on medical matters.

I don’t think the definition of terminal illness is right. People will be wasting their final good months applying for a “divorce from life order”.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

It’s the whole friggin point.

No. The whole thread is about the right to choose.

It's only you who is trying to divert.

Today you can:
- find a way to painlessly take your own life any time you want
- get lots of drugs to help you in your final hours of life.

Which is assisted dying. The whole point of this thread.

This bill seems to be a hybrid of abortion law and divorce law. It’s misses the objective.

Has nothing to do with whether people should have the choice or not. Nobody is arguing over the details, just the option

I see no value in a high court judge from the family law courts having oversight of medical experts on medical matters.

That's an opinion. But it doesn't affect whether somebody should have a choice, or not

I don’t think the definition of terminal illness is right. People will be wasting their final good months applying for a “divorce from life order”.

Again, an opinion.

But what is wrong with people having a choice ?

Should we be allowed a choice, or not ?

 

[denso13]

What is wrong with having a choice ?

Gather round kids, granny is about to commit suicide...

 

[motorbiking]

No. The whole thread is about the right to choose.

It's only you who is trying to divert.

Which is assisted dying. The whole point of this thread.

Has nothing to do with whether people should have the choice or not. Nobody is arguing over the details, just the option

That's an opinion. But it doesn't affect whether somebody should have a choice, or not

Again, an opinion.

But what is wrong with people having a choice ?

Should we be allowed a choice, or not ?

You already have a choice.

Example 1 is suicide.
Example 2 is palliative care.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

You already have a choice.

Example 1 is suicide.
Example 2 is palliative care.

Carry on Mr Swerve

If the question is too tough for you to address then I expect the non answers you have given. Most people will understand the question relates to the subject of this thread