I suggest you research Guy Gibson's views on politics and society.
And that has what exactly to do with the name of his dog?
I suggest you research Guy Gibson's views on politics and society.
Removing the dog's name is removing the stain on the character of the RAF by one of its illustrious former members.
Untrue eh? So why write this?You keep making the same untrue accusation, and I keep making the same reply, I'm ambivalent.
Removing the dog's name is removing the stain on the character of the RAF by one of its illustrious former members.
It doesn't deny anyone's opportunity to get to know what type of person was Guy Gibson. It doesn't advertise his intolerant views.
Go back and read this thread. For someone who is ambivalent, you sure do go on as well as get yourself into a muddle.You would rather keep the dog's name and recognise Guy Gibson as a racist?
Well, actually I didn't ask your opinion of it, it was out out there as part of the conversation as people were mentioning music. Did I highlight a post of yours or address it to you? You jumped to conclusions, as well as try and put me down.If you knew that I didn't know the song, why ask my opinion of it, Blightymam?
he doesn't know what day of the week it is, youd get more sense out of the toaster -he's as mad as a box of frogs.Kanye West.. please ping him a mail ask him to remove his offensive words..
It would have been more pertinent to quote the Spanish (of which there are 50 million speakers in the US) or Portuguese word for black.Italian (and in many other languages) for black is nero. Not to far from the *** word.
You keep making the same untrue accusation, and I keep making the same reply, I'm ambivalent.
Untrue eh? So why write this?
You would rather keep the dog's name and recognise Guy Gibson as a racist?
How can a question be equated with giving an opinion?Go back and read this thread. For someone who is ambivalent,
So they're not concerned with racism in France, Holland, Belgium, etc.?It is only the English speaking countries which are obsessed with this nonsense.
If you're aware of Guy Gibson's intolerant political and social views, you would know the answer to your own question.And that has what exactly to do with the name of his dog?
Is that the same way you imagined I asked you your opinion, trawled the internet just to give you a song with the word in it? LOL.How can a question be equated with giving an opinion?
You've created in your own mind what you think is my opinion, and you're assuming your imagination is true.
Again, for someone who doesn't care, you do arf go on.If you're aware of Guy Gibson's intolerant political and social views, you would know the answer to your own question.
What has that got to do with what I wrote?So they're not concerned with racism in France, Holland, Belgium, etc.?
Wow, that's interesting.
Black Lives Matter: Police fire tear gas in Paris to disperse unauthorised march of 15,000 people
https://www.euronews.com/2020/06/13...aris-to-disperse-unauthorised-march-of-15-000
Black Lives Matter movement blooms in Netherlands, Belgium
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xopqyx5dEXU
Again, you can't read/understand.So they're not concerned with racism in France, Holland, Belgium, etc.?
Wow, that's interesting.
Black Lives Matter: Police fire tear gas in Paris to disperse unauthorised march of 15,000 people
https://www.euronews.com/2020/06/13...aris-to-disperse-unauthorised-march-of-15-000
Black Lives Matter movement blooms in Netherlands, Belgium
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xopqyx5dEXU
What has that got to do with what I wrote?
Perhaps if EFLImpudence was more specific about what he was referring to as nonsense, there wouldn't be any ambiguity.He's talking about the use of the words, not the BLM movement.
There was nothing ambiguous about his comment, you were unable to read/follow the conversation.. Normal response would be to admit a mistake, but you can never ever be wrong can you? You look like a right muppet with your response above.Perhaps if EFLImpudence was more specific about what he was referring to as nonsense, there wouldn't be any ambiguity.
Understanding his views on whether racism exists or not, it is understandable that I assume his use of the term nonsense referred to racism.