****** to be obliterated from our history!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
You keep making the same untrue accusation, and I keep making the same reply, I'm ambivalent.
Removing the dog's name is removing the stain on the character of the RAF by one of its illustrious former members.
It doesn't deny anyone's opportunity to get to know what type of person was Guy Gibson. It doesn't advertise his intolerant views.
Untrue eh? So why write this?
You would rather keep the dog's name and recognise Guy Gibson as a racist?
Go back and read this thread. For someone who is ambivalent, you sure do go on as well as get yourself into a muddle.

If you knew that I didn't know the song, why ask my opinion of it, Blightymam?
Well, actually I didn't ask your opinion of it, it was out out there as part of the conversation as people were mentioning music. Did I highlight a post of yours or address it to you? You jumped to conclusions, as well as try and put me down.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sponsored Links
Italian (and in many other languages) for black is nero. Not to far from the *** word.
It would have been more pertinent to quote the Spanish (of which there are 50 million speakers in the US) or Portuguese word for black.

There is no clamour for it to be banned.

It is only the English speaking countries which are obsessed with this nonsense.
 
You keep making the same untrue accusation, and I keep making the same reply, I'm ambivalent.
Untrue eh? So why write this?
You would rather keep the dog's name and recognise Guy Gibson as a racist?
Go back and read this thread. For someone who is ambivalent,
How can a question be equated with giving an opinion?
You've created in your own mind what you think is my opinion, and you're assuming your imagination is true.
 
It is only the English speaking countries which are obsessed with this nonsense.
So they're not concerned with racism in France, Holland, Belgium, etc.?
Wow, that's interesting. :rolleyes:

Black Lives Matter: Police fire tear gas in Paris to disperse unauthorised march of 15,000 people
https://www.euronews.com/2020/06/13...aris-to-disperse-unauthorised-march-of-15-000

Black Lives Matter movement blooms in Netherlands, Belgium
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xopqyx5dEXU
 
Last edited:
How can a question be equated with giving an opinion?
You've created in your own mind what you think is my opinion, and you're assuming your imagination is true.
Is that the same way you imagined I asked you your opinion, trawled the internet just to give you a song with the word in it? LOL.
And I assuming that you mean the nonsense you write, even when you get yourself in a contradictory muddle.

If you're aware of Guy Gibson's intolerant political and social views, you would know the answer to your own question.
Again, for someone who doesn't care, you do arf go on.
 
So they're not concerned with racism in France, Holland, Belgium, etc.?
Wow, that's interesting. :rolleyes:

Black Lives Matter: Police fire tear gas in Paris to disperse unauthorised march of 15,000 people
https://www.euronews.com/2020/06/13...aris-to-disperse-unauthorised-march-of-15-000

Black Lives Matter movement blooms in Netherlands, Belgium
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xopqyx5dEXU
Again, you can't read/understand.
He's talking about the use of the words, not the BLM movement.
Get a grip and stop trying to put people down ":rolleyes:"
 
What has that got to do with what I wrote?

He's talking about the use of the words, not the BLM movement.
Perhaps if EFLImpudence was more specific about what he was referring to as nonsense, there wouldn't be any ambiguity.
Understanding his views on whether racism exists or not, it is understandable that I assume his use of the term nonsense referred to racism.
Maybe his comment was intended to be ambiguous.
 
Perhaps if EFLImpudence was more specific about what he was referring to as nonsense, there wouldn't be any ambiguity.
Understanding his views on whether racism exists or not, it is understandable that I assume his use of the term nonsense referred to racism.
There was nothing ambiguous about his comment, you were unable to read/follow the conversation.. Normal response would be to admit a mistake, but you can never ever be wrong can you? You look like a right muppet with your response above.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Back
Top