- Joined
- 28 Oct 2005
- Messages
- 31,281
- Reaction score
- 1,997
- Country
Instead of making banal statements, why don't you join in and get your ass kicked?That's the problem. He will never admit he is wrong, and as for issuing an apology...
Instead of making banal statements, why don't you join in and get your ass kicked?That's the problem. He will never admit he is wrong, and as for issuing an apology...
So in summary bodies do burn. Glad we cleared that up.Instead of making banal statements, why don't you join in and get your ass kicked?That's the problem. He will never admit he is wrong, and as for issuing an apology...
So in summary bodies do burn. Glad we cleared that up.Instead of making banal statements, why don't you join in and get your ass kicked?That's the problem. He will never admit he is wrong, and as for issuing an apology...
yeah, course they do, you fruit loop.
Keep believing that.
I just feel sorry for you. The schools where you grew up must have been terrible.
Are you a homosexual? Maybe you're constantly in a form of internal strife cos you get funny feelings when you look at men.
yeah, course they do, you fruit loop.
Keep believing that.
I just feel sorry for you. The schools where you grew up must have been terrible.
At least I went. Up Uranus.
Are you a homosexual? Maybe you're constantly in a form of internal strife cos you get funny feelings when you look at men.
yeah, course they do, you fruit loop.
Keep believing that.
I just feel sorry for you. The schools where you grew up must have been terrible.
At least I went. Up Uranus.
Would explain your constant jokes about Uranus.
Some sort of latent desire.
Are you a homosexual? Maybe you're constantly in a form of internal strife cos you get funny feelings when you look at men.
yeah, course they do, you fruit loop.
Keep believing that.
I just feel sorry for you. The schools where you grew up must have been terrible.
At least I went. Up Uranus.
Would explain your constant jokes about Uranus.
Some sort of latent desire.
What planet are you on? Up Uranus.
Making lots of sense there Joe, much like the rest of your arguments.I wouldn't wish it my worst enemy. Sorry to disappoint you. Up Uranus.
If a body can sustain it's own fire for 7 hours why does it require on average between 500 and 600 pounds of wood to cremate a single corpse, can you show a single example of a body cremating itself using its own body mass,I see Jeds has gone quiet now he's defeated his own argument.
Do you still think bodies don't burn? Seem to remember you were quite certain about that fact earlier...
Do you think they do? 75% water? Are you on drugs?
I`m pretty sure I explained, and quoted the worlds foremost expert on the matter, and her evidence is that there is enough fuel in the human body for, once it is lit, and if there is wicking material present, it to sustain a fire.
Now, I don't know if she is Jewish or not, but I am inclined to go with her testimony.
What are your scientific qualifications btw? You seem quite expressive on how things are scientifically impossible? How many PhDs or published papers do you have?
A masters in material science perhaps? Or in fact are you just a buffoon?
Don't be silly. She'd get the Nobel Prize for proving science wrong. In this universe a body that is 75% water and 10% mineral doesn't burn. You must be on a different planet. That's it, you are on a different planet to the rest of us. Up Uranus.
"Assuming there is sufficient wick material, the body can sustain its own fire for around 7 hours. During this time, the heat causes muscles to dry out and contract, making the limbs move and sometimes adopt characteristic postures (see illustrations)."
New Scientist 2009.
Now I haven't seen the Nobel Prize list for the past few years, but I assume this basic science, like the type I was taught, was judged as unworthy of a prize.
What are your qualifications for being such an arrogant pr1ck?
Oh, thought so, keyboard scientist with the IQ of a dog turd.
Body fat can make a good fuel source, but it needs material such as clothing or charred wood to act as a wick. Like that in a wax candle, a wick absorbs the fat and pulls it into the flame, where it is vapourised, so enabling it to burn.If a body can sustain it's own fire for 7 hours why does it require on average between 500 and 600 pounds of wood to cremate a single corpse, can you show a single example of a body cremating itself using its own body mass,I see Jeds has gone quiet now he's defeated his own argument.
Do you still think bodies don't burn? Seem to remember you were quite certain about that fact earlier...
Do you think they do? 75% water? Are you on drugs?
I`m pretty sure I explained, and quoted the worlds foremost expert on the matter, and her evidence is that there is enough fuel in the human body for, once it is lit, and if there is wicking material present, it to sustain a fire.
Now, I don't know if she is Jewish or not, but I am inclined to go with her testimony.
What are your scientific qualifications btw? You seem quite expressive on how things are scientifically impossible? How many PhDs or published papers do you have?
A masters in material science perhaps? Or in fact are you just a buffoon?
Don't be silly. She'd get the Nobel Prize for proving science wrong. In this universe a body that is 75% water and 10% mineral doesn't burn. You must be on a different planet. That's it, you are on a different planet to the rest of us. Up Uranus.
"Assuming there is sufficient wick material, the body can sustain its own fire for around 7 hours. During this time, the heat causes muscles to dry out and contract, making the limbs move and sometimes adopt characteristic postures (see illustrations)."
New Scientist 2009.
Now I haven't seen the Nobel Prize list for the past few years, but I assume this basic science, like the type I was taught, was judged as unworthy of a prize.
What are your qualifications for being such an arrogant pr1ck?
Oh, thought so, keyboard scientist with the IQ of a dog turd.