Traitor

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
By stroke you mean, he was beaten to death with a fire extinguisher?
So all the people I quoted are right wing nut jobs are they? You'll find that Patrick Byrne describes himself as an independent with no interest in who wins or loses the election, but who believes that the election process should be fair, and should be seen to be fair.
Here's another one Jovan H Pulitzer, the genius who invented that phone recognition system, is he a right wing nut job as well? Or just another concerned citizen who has also put loads of evidence of fraud on line.
It must be very convenient for you to be stupid enough to just dismiss everybody as right wing nut jobs, so that you don't actually have to go to the bother of addressing their arguments.
I almost wish I was as Fcking stupid as you are.
 
No, but from what I heard it did.
You don't seem to realise the irony of your attempted put down, no surprise there.
Everything that we all think we know about anything, unless we are an eyewitness, comes through the filter of the mainstream media or big tech.
So we are all in that position of having heard it from somewhere or other.
Some of the more intelligent are a little more discerning about what is truth and what is lie, you demonstrably don't fall into that category.
 
Sponsored Links
Patrick Byrne describes himself as an independent

He describes himself as this on Twitter "Advocate of constitutional republicanism for government, blockchain for institutions, and educational choice for human capital". And reading his tweets, yes, another nut job.
 
If you've been reading the thread you'll understand my answer. Seems to satisfy evidence these days.
Oh dear indeed.
Affidavits are all hear say given by eye witnesses, but given under penalty of perjury. They are evidence, whether they are true or not can only be decided on by a court.
If the courts choose to dismiss the cases before examining any evidence at all, that in no way diminishes the affidavits, they are still evidence. They are just evidence that hasn't been heard, There are literally thousands of people serving long jail sentences in America based solely on affidavits from eye witnesses. What is it about that not being 'evidence' that you don't understand.
 
So all the people I quoted are right wing nut jobs are they?

<snip>

I almost wish I was as Fcking stupid as you are.
Were they there too, observing as the unrelated stroke happened to the police officer and performing the autopsy themselves?

I mean, one of those terrorists was probably trying to open his skull, but probably not to verify the cause of death.
 
Affidavits are all hear say given by eye witnesses, but given under penalty of perjury. They are evidence, whether they are true or not can only be decided on by a court.

So, if I could show you where the affidavits were considered but dismissed as poor or non existent evidence that would be a start? I've asked you this before.
 
So, if I could show you where the affidavits were considered but dismissed as poor or non existent evidence that would be a start?

Sorry, ignore that, you said all courts are corrupt.
 
Sorry, ignore that, you said all courts are corrupt.
Only the ones that rule against Mr Trump or his mobs. Or are those that agree just ones Trump has bribed? If he's so rich and courts are so corrupt, why doesn't he win all the time?
 
Stolen from Dan Bongino

The past 24 hours:
- Twitter permanently suspends President Trump
- Twitter suspends "POTUS" government twitter account
- Amazon employees call for company to stop hosting Parler through AWS
- Google removes Parler from Google Play, Apple considers following suit
- YouTube Bans Steve Bannon
- CEO of Mozilla says we need more than deplatforming

Me
Big tech is out of control. If you think the thought police will stop at censoring the right wing people who disagree with their world view, you are a fcking idiot.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Back
Top