I take it you've never heard of innocent until proven guilty. If you YouTube banned everyone who has ever been charged with a crime there wouldn't be much left to watch I expect.Youtube bans a guy who has been charged with fraud.
I take it you've never heard of innocent until proven guilty. If you YouTube banned everyone who has ever been charged with a crime there wouldn't be much left to watch I expect.Youtube bans a guy who has been charged with fraud.
You couldn't make this up...
Posted by Patrick Byrne on Twitter
My original claim was the no witness had ever been given a day in court and that the courts had used whatever excuses they could to dodge having the evidence heard.I did that and you changed the goalposts to this...
That's not how it works. Go read affidavits for Dummies.
Yes I can see how he would be a reliable source of information:
"Patrick Byrne says the zombie apocalypse is coming, and there's one thing that can save us: bitcoin"
Posted by Patrick Byrne on Twitter
StrawmanPatrick Byrne is a self made billionaire I believe. What are your qualifications again?
Please avoid presenting opinion as fact.courts had used whatever excuses they could
My original claim was the no witness had ever been given a day in court
He's literally been in bed with Russian spies, not a good reference for Donald Trumpovich.Patrick Byrne is a self made billionaire I believe. What are your qualifications again?
WRONGGeorgia ballots: DHS had been trying to move forward this week. Two days ago FBI jumped in claiming jurisdiction. Yesterday 3 PM FBI took control of shredding truck and materials, directed they be returned to shredding operation and the shredding job completed
It is fact, evidenced by the FACT that no witnesses of more than a thousand, who have all signed affidavits carrying a five year jail term for perjury, have ever been given the chance to air their testimony in a court of law, in the biggest, most serious allegation of election fraud that has ever been made in the States.Please avoid presenting opinion as fact.
Do you have any evidence to back up your assertion?
I am correct on both counts.ast two pathetic efforts
First of all do not call me a liar. "You have claimed affidavits are evidence, whether you believe them or not, and that no court has heard any evidence."No, you are now lying. You have claimed affidavits are evidence, whether you believe them or not, and that no court has heard any evidence. I showed you where a court has considered, and dismissed them and you say that is not what you meant.
You are a credit to Trumpism. Roll on the 20th.