Do none of you people want to address this
https://video.parler.com/Y3/iW/Y3iWk7KPgwNj.mp4
https://video.parler.com/Y3/iW/Y3iWk7KPgwNj.mp4
Traitor
- Thread starter sooey
- Start date
- Status
Sponsored Links
You do know that you can say things twice? It's not a process where you fill in the affidavits and then it is removed from your memory never to be seen again.
Or are the right-wing nutters really enjoying Johnny Mnemonic at the moment?
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 17,323
- Reaction score
- 2,398
- Country
No it isn't.
Here's the supreme court being barricaded up. I don't know whether that's to keep the public out or to keep the pedophiles in.
https://video.parler.com/vo/VP/voVPH4eNj7iT.mp4
https://video.parler.com/vo/VP/voVPH4eNj7iT.mp4
Sponsored Links
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 17,323
- Reaction score
- 2,398
- Country
If you like but I have already done it https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/...ims-electoral-fraud-rome-baseless/6567335002/
Oh isn't it?
Then perhaps you could explain how it is that in one of the most important cases ever brought before a court in the United States, a case to decide the next president, with over a thousand eye witnesses to fraud between the many various cases. That not one of those eye witnesses ever got into court to detail their experiences publicly.
Oh that's alright then, you've quoted another one of those phoney fact checker things that have sprung up lately.
So let's ignore the Italian lawyer telling you that he's got a client who is in hiding in fear of his life, who has given him a signed affidavit detailing everything he was involved in and saying that he is willing to testify if he and his family are guaranteed safety.
Why would that Italian guy make that up?
Actually I could think of a few reasons why but do you not think that allegations as serious as he is making should be investigated?
Credible witnesses eh?
Giuliani’s witness at voter fraud hearing just got off probation for computer crime, reports say
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 17,323
- Reaction score
- 2,398
- Country
Simple, there was no fraud. Trump's lawyers said before judges the were not claiming fraud, in every court case https://time.com/5914377/donald-trump-no-evidence-fraud/. The prosecution has to present their case, it isn't for the judge to listen to witnesses for absolutely no reason.
"The judge pressed Goldstein to answer the specific question: “Are you claiming that there is any fraud in connection with these 592 disputed ballots?” To which Goldstein replied: “To my knowledge at present, no.”
Wow. that's it then those thousand odd other witnesses to the same things must be a gang of lying bstrds.
Dhead
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 17,323
- Reaction score
- 2,398
- Country
I've asked you this several times as well. If the votes were changed over t'internet, how do the manual recount of the votes confirm the machine numbers?
Your quote relates to one specific case does it not?
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 17,323
- Reaction score
- 2,398
- Country
No, in which case(s) did they actually claim fraud?
I believe I gave you that answer many pages back. The poll workers in five or six different state who stayed behind stuffing the ballot boxes late at night with nobody else there, were given target figures for how many allots they needed to stuff in.
That and the fact that the counts in those states went on for about a week in some cases as they kept bringing more ballots in gave them plenty of time to make the final tallies match up.
surely a recount is only going to confirm what's been entered, give or take a percentage to allow for human error. It would need a full audit to uncover some of the frauds suggested which I'm sure we all know wont happen at this late stage, and would we want it to happen anyway? we might not like the result.
- Status
Sponsored Links
