Trevor Sinclar

  • Thread starter Deleted member 294929
  • Start date
Sponsored Links
They intended to create a no-go area in retaliation for the abuse suffered by their parents and themselves over many years - and in similar circumstances i'd probably do the same thing. You can keep the lid on a pressure cooker for so long but when the BBC turned up the heat with a broadcast on R4, the issue exploded into violence and recrimination.
David Dimbleby recalled the time in a programme on BBC2 last night and if you missed it, i recommend catch-up on IPlayer. He invited Nick Griffin of the BNP to come on Question Time to explain the position of English Nationalists in front of a live audience alongside Bonnie Greer and then Home Secretary Jack Straw. He was set upon from all sides and left the auditorium in tatters. The BNP never really recovered and it's one of those moments when the BBC showed how powerful democracy can be when open debate is allowed to flourish, rather than allowing the resentment to fester and grow into hate.
The national front changed its name a few times and ended up trying to be a genuine political party.
It was no surprise to anyone when griffin who was chosen to be the spokesperson appeared to be thicker than a whale omelette. griffin was obviously not the brains of the outfit
 
The national front changed its name a few times and ended up trying to be a genuine political party.
Far right political parties do that. They also appear to soften their ideology to appeal more to central voters
But their core ideology does not change, it's anti-foreigner. Nick Griffin espoused the ideology precisely.
There are numerous examples:
UK - NF, BNP,
France - Le Pen and Front National, now Rally National
Sweden - Swedish Democrats have softened their message, but their ideology remains the same.

Sure there are many examples of political parties changing their names, but their core ideology does not change., In the case of central, centre-right, centre-left and left parties, it's purely a change of name to reflect the current consistency of the party.
 
Sponsored Links
like Nick Griffin did in Oldham when Asian youths made part of the town a no-go area for white people, sparking riots and inflaming racial tension.
I don't like Nick Griffin but he isn't / wasn't the problem, and the problem remained, and remained covered up by the mainstream media.

Glodwick in Oldham, and other such places in the north, are absolute hell on earth and demonstrate horribly the mistake of multiculturalism.

The MSM ought to show the reality of life in these places. The white people who can afford to, move out, and are away from the problem leaving the less well-off whites to suffer the double whammy of the horrors of multiculturalism and being called racists.
 
I don't like Nick Griffin but he isn't / wasn't the problem, and the problem remained, and remained covered up by the mainstream media.
The mainstream media failed to report the vast majority of racial attacks on immigrants for decades (and still do). In addition the police failed these immigrants by not policing those areas as they ought to have. This led to the vengeful attacks on white people. But these attacks were immediately pounced on by the media, and the police investigated these incidents in a way they had chosen to not investigate the previous racist issues against the immigrants. It was a two-tier police system and media reporting.
 
I don't like Nick Griffin but he isn't / wasn't the problem, and the problem remained, and remained covered up by the mainstream media.

Glodwick in Oldham, and other such places in the north, are absolute hell on earth and demonstrate horribly the mistake of multiculturalism.

The MSM ought to show the reality of life in these places. The white people who can afford to, move out, and are away from the problem leaving the less well-off whites to suffer the double whammy of the horrors of multiculturalism and being called racists.
Of course Griffin isn't the problem, he just exploits the problem and throws petrol on the fire.
What the BBC did in its report on Oldham was shine a light on the way both sides in the community have failed to come to terms with living side by side and in the process allow these divisions in understanding each others cultural distinction to become exploited by far-right groups.
Both sides feel let down by police and politicians as nothing is done to cure the root cause of these problems; poverty and decline.
If the Tories really mean to 'level-up' in the north then they need to put their money where their mouth is and get on with it.
 
Glodwick in Oldham, and other such places in the north, are absolute hell on earth and demonstrate horribly the mistake of multiculturalism.
It must the majority of the population making it hell on earth. As only 19% are Asian, I fail to see how "hell on earth" can be blamed on Asians.
1663311752239.png


Or maybe it's the 1.24% of Black people, or the 1.8% of mixed ethnicity people.
 
The evening news reported on the latest council business recently.

One has to wonder where were all these people when children were being abuse in children's homes all around the country, or by people in authority, or by well-known people, or by the leaders of various religions. I never saw any groups protesting about such issues going on for decades.
But then the perpetrators weren't foreign, they were religious indigenous people who were protected by their organisations.
 
Do you live in or near the area?
I have stated on numerous occasions that I do not disclose my personal details. There are some posters on here that either have access to personal details and have been proven to intentionally and vengefully disclose those personal details, or they are liars and only claim to have access to such details.
Neither Mods nor Admin have discredited their claim.

There are other posters on here that eagerly weaponise personal details because the power of reasoned debate eludes them.
 
I have stated on numerous occasions that I do not disclose my personal details. There are some posters on here that either have access to personal details and have been proven to intentionally and vengefully disclose those personal details, or they are liars and only claim to have access to such details.
Neither Mods nor Admin have discredited their claim.

There are other posters on here that eagerly weaponise personal details because the power of reasoned debate eludes them.
It's not that big a deal, really.
Perhaps the question; 'have you ever lived in such an area/town?' would be easier to answer.
 
It's ******, he knows he's not lived in Oldham. Same has he takes people for fools with his coyness about being on here under another name. A knave, a charlatan?
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top