A one solar mass black hole's gravitational pull would extend over the same area as the sun's does. The event horizon is the point of no return, where even light is not fast enough to escape once it has been crossed, I can't remember which book it was, but one of them by some famous scientist (it might have been Hawking's brief history of time)did say that it would be about the size of a football for a solar mass black hole. The extra mass from swallowing an Earth sized object wouldn't increase the event horizon by any noticeable difference, coinsidering it already has the mass of a star.
truckers.
- Thread starter joe-90
- Start date
- Status
A one solar mass black hole's gravitational pull would extend over the same area as the sun's does. The event horizon is the point of no return, where even light is not fast enough to escape once it has been crossed, I can't remember which book it was, but one of them by some famous scientist (it might have been Hawking's brief history of time)did say that it would be about the size of a football for a solar mass black hole. The extra mass from swallowing an Earth sized object wouldn't increase the event horizon by any noticeable difference, coinsidering it already has the mass of a star.
Sponsored Links
- Joined
- 28 Oct 2005
- Messages
- 31,281
- Reaction score
- 1,997
- Country
No fraternizing with sock-puppets allowed. Sorry.
- Joined
- 19 Jun 2008
- Messages
- 15
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
Alright I give up, I was looking forward to my butt kicking but you seem to have got stuck on this sock puppet thing, real cutting edge stuff,
Just out of interest, you have never exchanged words with my real username,who is a a real nice guy.
Just out of interest, you have never exchanged words with my real username,who is a a real nice guy.
Sponsored Links
The Black Hole, if Cern created one, would be very small to begin with.
It would not have the mass of a star........
The Black Hole, if Cern created one, would be very small to begin with.
It would not have the mass of a star........
Ya don't say!!
- Joined
- 28 Oct 2005
- Messages
- 31,281
- Reaction score
- 1,997
- Country
I'd like to meet him one day. Post under it or be seen as a coward.
- Joined
- 19 Jun 2008
- Messages
- 15
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
I'm a coward, wish I had a glove so I could slap you across the face. I really couldn't give a flying **** what you think of me. I assure you I'm not and you really wouldn't want to meet up with me but is that true or am I just being brave sitting behind a keyboard, that my little to$$er is something you will never find out.
No more from me, I'm getting angry and you wouldn't like me when I get angry.
Ta Ta
No more from me, I'm getting angry and you wouldn't like me when I get angry.
Ta Ta
- Joined
- 28 Oct 2005
- Messages
- 31,281
- Reaction score
- 1,997
- Country
The Black Hole, if Cern created one, would be very small to begin with.
It would not have the mass of a star........
ya don't say!!
Do you have any understanding of how your thoughts get mixed up, or are you just stupid.
Actually smart4rse, if you read the posts properly you will see that it's your thoughts that are mixed up, for instance you statedThe Black Hole, if Cern created one, would be very small to begin with.
It would not have the mass of a star........
ya don't say!!
Do you have any understanding of how your thoughts get mixed up, or are you just stupid.
A post in which, you were talking about a solar mass black hole, I then pointed out to you that as it already had the mass of a star, it would not grow by very much swallowing an Earth sized object, as you had stated it would. You then decided to state the obvious, that any black hole created at cern would be very small to begin with. For Softus' sake I will qualify why it is obvious, it is obvious because according to Einsteins famous equation, E=MC2, which means that you can get an awful amount of energy from matter if you obliterate it in the right way. If you turn that around you get M=EC2 which means that you need an awful lot of energy to create a tiny bit of matter. In fact all of the energy so far poured into the world's particle accelerators has not managed to create enough matter to cover the end of a needle. So, given the very limited amount of energy available for this experiment, of course they will not be able to create anything more than a sub atomic particle or two. Now do you have any understanding of how your thoughts were mixed up, or are you just stupid?
I thought I'd had enough of this topic, but I'm beside myself with glee.
sooey, please do walk us through the algebra you used there.
And don't think I didn't notice another use of the word "obvious", you wishful thinking little rascal you.
I thought I'd had enough of this topic, but I'm beside myself with glee.
sooey, please do walk us through the algebra you used there.
And don't think I didn't notice another use of the word "obvious", you wishful thinking little rascal you.
Certainly Softus, E=MC2 is actually very simple, even I can understand it, I think, so you should have no bother. E represents energy, M represents mass, C represents the speed of light. which is a very high number and when squared is astronomically high. What it translates to as I already said is that mass and energy have an equivalence, meaning that you can turn mass into energy or energy into mass. As you get a lot of energy from an amount of mass, you also need a lot of energy to create the same amount of mass. Is that allright, it's how I understand it anyway, if you have any revelations please feel free. While you're at it, I'm still waiting for you to explain why you felt it necessary to ridicule the black hole/centre of the Earth thing, you know, the invisible pacman
Having read my explanation, do you still think that it is a ludicrous idea, if so why? and bear in mind that since I have gone to the trouble of giving you my understanding of the science involved, it behoves you to do the same.- Status
Sponsored Links
Similar threads
