Trump defamation settlement (Ed.)

You think the Jury gave a verdict on a Rape trial? Surely you're not that stupid.


The judge in the case stated that his sexual assault equates to rape in the mind of any reasonable person.

The jury awarded £2m for the sexual battery, $3m for the defamation. And then, because he couldn't keep his mouth shut, they awarded a further $83.5m.

The guy is a loud mouthed moron.
 
Sponsored Links
The judge in the case stated that his sexual assault equates to rape in the mind of any reasonable person.

The jury awarded £2m for the sexual battery, $3m for the defamation. And then, because he couldn't keep his mouth shut, they awarded a further $83.5m.

The guy is a loud mouthed moron.
He may be a loud mouthed moron, but he is not a convicted rapist. He hasn't even been on trail for rape, not arrested or charged.
 
Sponsored Links
As the judge said to Trump's lawyers' motion, I find your argument “entirely unpersuasive.” Case closed.
 
Oh dear poor denso really does think Trump is convicted of Rape.
 
He may be a loud mouthed moron, but he is not a convicted rapist. He hasn't even been on trail for rape, not arrested or charged.

True, he was not convicted of rape, but he was deemed to be guilty by a jury of his peers of having sexually abused a woman and the judge said that that the abuse equated to rape. I don't understand why you are defending him.

I can, under UK law/fair comment say that the judge in the case decided that Trump was guilty of rape. I have not said that he was guilty of rape, but, all day long, I will repeat the judge's ruling. And Donnie can't do jack about it.
 
I don't understand why you are defending him.
Because it’s all about winning cool points on the internet.

It’s not about Trump, it’s about being right on the semantics. Trump isn’t a *convicted* rapist; hence my point earlier about needing a comma.

Trump isn’t a convicted felon and (convicted) rapist
Trump is a convicted felon, and a (unconvicted) rapist - a Judge in a civil trial says he is, but he wasn’t *convicted*

You can’t win the argument by being morally correct, or agreeing with the opinion of the majority of people. You have to be absolutely factually correct in every single point of your argument otherwise the trolls just turn up with their “Yeah, but….”
 
On that I agree whole-heartedly.

That’s not libellous, is it?

Over here, given that we don't have the First Amendment, your comment is covered by a principle called "fair comment" and if you call Trump a ch*un*t or wanger, you are pretty safe, the site however, if based in the UK is not covered by Section 230. That only applies to sites based in the USA and latterly Canada.

Trump is such a preek that when negotiating his NAFTA 2.0, he insisted that Canada adopt Section 230. The Canadians agreed.

When his assault on the Capitol building failed, and he was banned from Facebook and Twitter, he demanded that 230 be revoked.

230 allows the likes of twitter and facebook (and his crap site) to say that they are not not publishers and in the event that someone posts something libelous, they have a reasonable time to delete it.

Trump is a special kind of stupid. His site hides behind Section 230.

Nah... chuff it, he is a special kind of stoopid and anyone whom thinks that he is smart is evidently not smart.

Like Trump and his policies- fair enough, but he really is a special kind of stupid. He makes Dubya look smart, and Dubya wants nothing to do with trump

My prediction- he will allow more drilling on federal land. Oil prices are set globally. Oil will drop by 2-5%. Food prices will not drop-if anything, his tariffs will increase prices.

I am glad that I am not American. I didn't want Kamla, but she only lost by 1.6%.

Putin and Xi stand to win this round.
 
True, he was not convicted of rape, but he was deemed to be guilty by a jury of his peers of having sexually abused a woman and the judge said that that the abuse equated to rape. I don't understand why you are defending him.

I can, under UK law/fair comment say that the judge in the case decided that Trump was guilty of rape. I have not said that he was guilty of rape, but, all day long, I will repeat the judge's ruling. And Donnie can't do jack about it.
I don’t care if you defame trump. But no jury has found trump guilty of rape. He’d be in prison if he was.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top