Trump encourages Putin to attack NATO...

I'm aware of that, but it wouldn't work - long term, anyway - without the mouthbreathers' support.
So how could it be changed given the voting options?

It's more profitable killing people than treating them!
 
Sponsored Links
Go on then


Which bit do you think is wrong

Which bit is right

Blimey we can rely on the European members of
NATO :ROFLMAO: who is that than ??

The only thing you can rely on is them bumping there gums

They certainly stepped up in the Red Sea

We’re as we sent out entire Air Force ( 4 fighter jets ??? )
 
It's more profitable killing other people than treating your own, you mean.
The NRA don't seem to agree...

Every time there is a mass killing on American soil it simply increases gun sales in America...

They always say that people 'need more guns' to stop the killing in their own country...

And the ignorant sheeple always keep voting for the same future ;)
 
Sponsored Links
Is he bluffing so as underspenders put their hands in their pockets. Or is he one of those Americans who would have left us alone in WW2?
 
Is he bluffing so as underspenders put their hands in their pockets.
Define 'underspenders', and refer it back to the goals of the military industrial complex ;)

Or is he one of those Americans who would have left us alone in WW2?
You mean like the ones who left the UK paying back the WWII 'war debt' until 2006?

Or the ones who 'persuaded' the UK to hand over it's technological advances for peanuts and sold them back for fortunes?

Money was, is, and always will be where those who actually call the shots are concerned!
 
Define 'underspenders', and refer it back to the goals of the military industrial complex ;)


You mean like the ones who left the UK paying back the WWII 'war debt' until 2006?

Or the ones who 'persuaded' the UK to hand over it's technological advances for peanuts and sold them back for fortunes?

Money was, is, and always will be where those who actually call the shots are concerned!

Germany & France stick out.
 
Define 'underspenders', and refer it back to the goals of the military industrial complex ;)


You mean like the ones who left the UK paying back the WWII 'war debt' until 2006?

Or the ones who 'persuaded' the UK to hand over it's technological advances for peanuts and sold them back for fortunes?

Money was, is, and always will be where those who actually call the shots are concerned!

Germany & France stick out
You mean like the ones who left the UK paying back the WWII 'war debt' until 2006?

Or the ones who 'persuaded' the UK to hand over it's technological advances for peanuts and sold them back for fortunes?
I'm not sticking up for Trump or the yanks if that's what you're thinking!
 
Blimey can we rely on the French ? Italians ? Germans ?

The Dutch ? They will all be bombed out of there eads ?

Turkey have a sizeable military but are loose cannons ??

Greeks yeah right

Belgium ??? Who are they any way ?

Nope take the yanks out and we are basically on our own or down the toilet ?
 
Blimey we could probably muster up a squadron of planes ?? Dozen surface ships ? Couple of air craft carriers assuming they actually go ? Doubt they would have any air craft on em ? And army you could get into old Trafford with plenty of room to spare

Conscription blimey bunch of have not got a clue youngsters who would be hard pushed to find there back sides in the dark with both hands and a torch

Basically we would be $$$$ed ;)
 
There is theory that Trump would be happy with 3 strong super power leaders. Him, Putin and the Chinese one. It simplifies things. Really? Some USA poly aren't happy about Trump's apparent relationship with Putin.

France maintain their own nuc's. Seems we have USA ones here again now- plus our subs. We did load up USA ones on those for a while, and unload them back.
 
Pretty much every NATO country spends about 2% of their GDP on defence.
Trump is an idiot who believes that they should pay that to the USA in some way.
He also believes that the USA own all the overseas bases and would continue to use them.

He wants the NATO money spent on US made gear. The US military has so much that it gives tanks to the police due to overspend.

The only recipient of the NATO mutual aid agreement has been the USA.
I think it's fewer than half.
 
Sponsored Links

Similar threads

Back
Top