UFO / UAP

[Brigadier]

It’s about chip density of single core processors. It was relevant 20 years ago. A bit like intel.

Like your example of throwing a satellite at the nearest star being evidence of speed gain progression, compared to firing rockets t'other way.

 

[noseall]

Your maths is out from the start. You’ve been told a dozen times.

Nonsense.
You haven’t explained what you mean either.
Proxima C will move away from the Sun at the same rate it moved towards the Sun. We will be no better off in 55000 years time, when we’ll be two thirds into the journey.

 

[noseall]

Like your example of throwing a satellite at the nearest star being evidence of speed gain progression, compared to firing rockets t'other way.

MBK grasp of space travel is akin to an excited 6yr old child.

 

[noseall]

But it’s doesn’t and it won’t.

Explain please?

 

[Highway Man]

I forgot it goes 12m

15 actually, but whos counting

 

[motorbiking]

Nonsense.
You haven’t explained what you mean either.
Proxima C will move away from the Sun at the same rate it moved towards the Sun. We will be no better off in 55000 years time, when we’ll be two thirds into the journey.

Two thirds into the journey

 

[noseall]

Two thirds into the journey

Is that your explanation?

But it’s doesn’t and it won’t.

What do you mean?

 

[motorbiking]

MBK grasp of space travel is akin to an excited 6yr old child.

Does Nosenout’s first law of boll@x say man cannot use the gravitational pull of celestial objects to accelerate? The Apollo program will be upset.

 

[noseall]

Does Nosenout’s first law of boll@x say man cannot use the gravitational pull of celestial objects to accelerate?

More nonsense. I never said any such thing. However, if you believe man can travel to the nearest star using nothing but gravitational pull, then you are more deluded than I first thought.

 

[noseall]

But it’s doesn’t and it won’t.

Can you explain please?
I can’t work out whether you believe that Proxima C will somehow stall in space or that it will magically start moving towards the Sun/Earth, after it has reached its closest point?

 

[pete01]

How much more proof do we need

 

[Koolpc]

I believe that Nosenout has been in space then by that headline in the Star!

 

[pete01]

I believe that Nosenout has been in space then by that headline in the Star!

Conkers Bonkers?

 

[motorbiking]

Can you explain please?
I can’t work out whether you believe that Proxima C will somehow stall in space or that it will magically start moving towards the Sun/Earth, after it has reached its closest point?

You’ve stated it will take 70,000 years to travel 4 light years. You’ve assumed the maximum speed possible is based on a vehicle with a top speed slightly faster than voyager 1. You then assumed it would take 52,000ish years to do 3 light years. You’ve assumed man will never produce anything faster. Even though we subsequently did, a probe that would do it in under 10,000 years. Not to mention that it’s CPoA is in 30,000 years

 

[noseall]

You’ve stated it will take 70,000 years to travel 4 light years. You’ve assumed the maximum speed possible is based on a vehicle with a top speed slightly faster than voyager 1. You then assumed it would take 52,000ish years to do 3 light years. You’ve assumed man will never produce anything faster. Even though we subsequently did, a probe that would do it in under 10,000 years. Not to mention that it’s CPoA is in 30,000 years

Man will never travel those distances - what's your point?

You still haven't explained this...

But it’s doesn’t and it won’t.

?