UK suffers highest death rate from coronavirus

Populations are not spread evenly across the country. Most people live in towns and cities.

Do you think London, Paris, Berlin are so "different" that they cannot be compared? Or Birmingham, Milan, Stuttgart?

No, they are not.
Exactly, the comparisons are being made between countries not towns and cities.
 
Sponsored Links
Are our towns and cities particularly more densely populated than others?
Some are, some are not , some countries have lots of dense population areas some not, hence no direct comparison can be made.
 
Sponsored Links
What recent historic occurrences increased the death rate in some of those other countries, which might suggest a regression to the mean?
e.g. a heatwave in 2019 which was reported to kill 30k extra people in Spain alone
Where do all the old people live in a country?
What is the %age of old people by comparison?
Are our old people particularly healthy by comparison (obesity, diabetes etc)
Do the different Countries have similar reporting processes?

Only once you've baselined for that can you make comparisons.

30k in Spain alone? You sure.

The heatwave was the last week of June 2019 so would have no bearing on the current figures.

As to the population distribution - what bearing does that have on excess deaths for each country?
 
It still looks horrendous alongside the world-beating superlatives employed by BJ, such as his apparent success in beating this virus, smash the virus, first-class system, win this war, more tests than anyone else, British invented testing system, our own produced tracking system, etc, etc.
And of course, we're in this together, except evidently, we're not.
And how close are we to 250,000 tests by the end of May?
 
the reason is probably because the government decided herd immunity was the solution - just let everybody get it and boom, we're cured.

Problem is, it is not gone, it is just as contagious as it was 6 months ago. So, we have 2 options - either stay in perpetual lockdown, or start mingling again. If we start mingling now, we can infect more people while the hospitals are mostly coping. If we wait until September, send every kid back to school and open all the shops, cafes, pubs, gyms etc. then we risk another peak in winter, which will be bloody awful.
 
the reason is probably because the government decided herd immunity was the solution - just let everybody get it and boom, we're cured.

Problem is, it is not gone, it is just as contagious as it was 6 months ago. So, we have 2 options - either stay in perpetual lockdown, or start mingling again. If we start mingling now, we can infect more people while the hospitals are mostly coping. If we wait until September, send every kid back to school and open all the shops, cafes, pubs, gyms etc. then we risk another peak in winter, which will be bloody awful.


I'm not in anyway condoning the governments behaviour, but we (they) have no choice but to start opening up soon, we aren't able to afford a very prolonged lockdown. Sure they'll be "collateral damage" (read: someone's mother,father,brother,sister,son,daughter) Hobson's choice and boy what a choice.
 
One size doesn't fit all.

Pensioners are 34 X more likely to die from COVID, so plenty of people can go to work, travel etc. without overwhelming the NHS. Perhaps we should test easing out of lockdown, by increasing the exposure of those least at risk, for maximum benefit. If only our govt. had thought of that.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top