People who support this madness should be forced to pay higher taxes to look after them.
Exactly. I've always thought this. There should be a special, opt-in, opt-out hand-wringer super-tax code. Those that want to write a blank cheque on the tax payer should be the tax payers that actually pay for this stupidity.
Let the economic migrants, sorry, silly me - 'asylum seekers' be supported by the idealogically gullible, and make sure that asylum seeker reception centres are set up in areas where the chattering classes live.
Milicin - would you be happy to pay higher taxes to support your pc principles? Simple yes/no answer please - no inconclusive 8 paragraph diversion please.
I don't see it as PC, but yes , with hypothecation and pro rata rates on corporations etc.
Why are you confusing Economic migrants with asylum seekers?
I can do more than eight paragraphs, of course, but I genuinely find it funny that you think I usually divert rather than address a question!
Their both the same. freeloaders. Migration watch uk puts them in the same boat
You want them here so you pay for them. And if they happen to bring any benefit to the country you can have your share dividend bonus also.
But I do already - thats how the economy works.
(BTW your Ignore button appears to be broken )
Why is it if the dictatorship of the eu took Africa into the eu, you left wing libertards would start defending the rights of the inhabitants of that continent to come here?
I don't think you understand the pinciples of a strawman argument.No answer then reindeer. Strawman!
Can't wait until the shambles of the eu falls apart and you dreamers can move to Africa and promote the free movement of freeloaders (from whats left of Europe) into Africa where they will be right at home.
No answer to what?Its "hypothetical" to highlight the flawed arguments of you leftwing libertards.
Still no answer.
Answer to what?Still no answer.
I see. So you can't tell me the question for which I have no answer:Maybe mic will give it a shot. Another "strawman".
And you have the audacity to suggest that anyone else is using a strawman agument when you can't enunciate your own argument.Answer to what?Still no answer.
I see. So you can't tell me the question for which I have no answer:Maybe mic will give it a shot. Another "strawman".
And you have the audacity to suggest that anyone else is using a strawman agument when you can't enunciate your own argument.Answer to what?Still no answer.
With apologies to Breadandbutter but I've misappropritaed one of his quotes:
"If I speak in the tongues[a] of men or of angels, but do not have comprehension, I am only a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal."
Is this supposed to be the question?Why is it if the dictatorship of the eu took Africa into the eu, you left wing libertards would start defending the rights of the inhabitants of that continent to come here?
Is this supposed to be the question?Why is it if the dictatorship of the eu took Africa into the eu, you left wing libertards would start defending the rights of the inhabitants of that continent to come here?
Can you re-type it in English and so it makes sense.
He obviously doesn't know what his argument was or is, so he can't re-phrase it.Is this supposed to be the question?Why is it if the dictatorship of the eu took Africa into the eu, you left wing libertards would start defending the rights of the inhabitants of that continent to come here?
Can you re-type it in English and so it makes sense.
Contact your local immigrant help office if English is not your first language.