I've already established that two doctors are required to approve an abortion. The rest is deflective waffle.
Vive La France!
- Thread starter noseall
- Start date
Sponsored Links
- Joined
- 25 Jul 2022
- Messages
- 12,245
- Reaction score
- 946
- Country
I know.
I'm just waiting for mbk to put it in black and white
Admit he is wrong, or to just keep showing himself up. This isn't the 1st (or the last) time he has been wrong on laws.
But MBK is making a point not being argued and in any case is theoretical as the system is designed for form HSA1 to be signed.
Do you know of any circumstances in which a planned abortion would sidestep the HSA1 form being filled in and signed
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 16,989
- Reaction score
- 2,573
- Country
Emergency abortion.
Sponsored Links
It's not that difficult to research. The Act itself, the text in various solicitors, doctors, nurses and midwives articles or studies, ALL say that the abortion requires two doctors approval.
FFS even that great bastion of law, Parliament says so!
Is that true though. Only one doctor is required but isn't there still a declaration? HSA 2,3 ir 4....?
Nor is it planned
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 16,989
- Reaction score
- 2,573
- Country
why are you asking me - I thought you were the expert.
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 16,989
- Reaction score
- 2,573
- Country
HSA1, 2, 4 etc are nothing to do with the legal exemption. They are required under separate provision.
So aside from a medical emergency taking precedence, no abortion takes place without the approval of 2 doctors signing HSA1
You keep avoiding answering what happens if form HSA1 is not signed.
We all know the answer: no sign no approval, no abortion
More irrelevant waffle.
Correct.
Even if one of the docs firgets to sign, it gets sent straight back untill it is filled in correctly. The law govering this is strict, distinct, explicit.
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 16,989
- Reaction score
- 2,573
- Country
Are you sure?
Subsection (3) of this section, and so much of subsection (1) as relates to the opinion of two registered medical practitioners, shall not apply to the termination of a pregnancy by a registered medical practitioner in a case where he is of the opinion, formed in good faith, that the termination is immediately necessary to save the life or to prevent grave permanent injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman.
Seems the abortion Act disagrees - but you've mostly been ignoring the rest it of it anyway to form your opinion. So why not Subsection 3
Subsection (3) of this section, and so much of subsection (1) as relates to the opinion of two registered medical practitioners, shall not apply to the termination of a pregnancy by a registered medical practitioner in a case where he is of the opinion, formed in good faith, that the termination is immediately necessary to save the life or to prevent grave permanent injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman.
Seems the abortion Act disagrees - but you've mostly been ignoring the rest it of it anyway to form your opinion. So why not Subsection 3
It fails to mention signing and dating the HSA1 form too.
It is no less important in terms of the abortion proceeding.
No approval no abortion.
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 16,989
- Reaction score
- 2,573
- Country
Yes HSA1 is not mentioned in the legal exemption. The only requirement the abortion act does, is create an obligation in a separate piece of law and create an offence of wilful failure.
So now you can see, that the exemption in section 1 is not dependant on any subsequent legislation in an act that did not exist at the time.
So now you can see, that the exemption in section 1 is not dependant on any subsequent legislation in an act that did not exist at the time.
Sponsored Links
