Trans has gone full troll mode. Ignore him.No, they aren't,
Trans has gone full troll mode. Ignore him.No, they aren't,
It's more than that, he's devious and dishonest, a manipulating liar.Because he is a nutter - massive nutter.
No, they aren't,
Trans has gone full troll mode. Ignore him.
Even a f***ed clock is right twice a day.some of what he says, makes perfectly good sense
They just been talking about the nonsense on the radio
Listen to better radio stations then
before this case gets to trial, there’s the Trump inciting violence on the Capitol and there’s Trump trying to push voter fraud in Georgia.According to what I saw today, Fat Tw@t was indicted (in simple terms) for
- Coercing Cohen to take out a loan to pay off SD
- Failing to declare the pay off as a campaign expense
(these seem a bit of a stretch to me but, hey ho .....)
- claiming the money he paid back to Cohen was a business expense, and claiming a tax deduction
- conspiracy (the above)
Let the lawyers argue the toss
before this case gets to trial, there’s the Trump inciting violence on the Capitol and there’s Trump trying to push voter fraud in Georgia.
oh and he has some civil lawsuits for debts as well.
Simple cases progress faster.Grow up Notch, do you not think if any of the other cases had any merit, they might have made it to court before this case, which also doesn't have any merit.
Nothing wrong with hunting witches, But let's at least be honest about it, we're hunting witches. We're definitely not hunting anything to do with the Biden family's involvement with Ukranian companies or the insidious world of the Clintons.
All will be revealed one day, We'll probably both be dead by then.
According to what I saw today, Fat Tw@t was indicted (in simple terms) for
- Coercing Cohen to take out a loan to pay off SD
- Failing to declare the pay off as a campaign expense
(these seem a bit of a stretch to me but, hey ho .....)
- claiming the money he paid back to Cohen was a business expense, and claiming a tax deduction
- conspiracy (the above)
Let the lawyers argue the toss
Simple cases progress faster.
Why do you think it has a poor chance of success? It's clearly incorrect bookkeeping after all. That much is bloody clear. Three different instances of trying to hide affairs or illegitimate children all classed as business expenses.How many years does it take to prepare a case against, say, inciting a riot? And for the avoidance of doubt, they have phone evidence, text evidence, video evidence, the verbal evidence of the honourable opposition, some would say he's bang to rights, why no prosecution?, why go for a prosecution which has little chance of succeeding?
Why do you think it has a poor chance of success? It's clearly incorrect bookkeeping after all. That much is bloody clear. Three different instances of trying to hide affairs or illegitimate children all classed as business expenses.