1-4-16

[EFLImpudence]

http://thelawdictionary.org/article/how-is-donald-trump-able-to-file-for-bankruptcy-so-many-times/

 

[Himaginn]

You and Himmy are going to such lengths in attempts to be clever-dicks that you are only succeeding in achieving half that aim.

You've assumed what our objective is, and you've applied your own measure of our success.
What gives you such high degree of perception as to assume our objective?
What gives you such superiority to apply and measure our success?

Why don't you try a reasoned argument instead of resorting to pathetic insults?

 

[EFLImpudence]

Bankruptcy is just a way for rich people to keep assets and avoid paying creditors.

 

[Himaginn]

the fat cats of this world.

Unlike multi-billionaire Trump, you mean?

Exactly. He's made his money, can't be bought and doesn't need to answer to anyone . He's proved himself in the real world. Surely that is an advantage?

He made his money by cheating others. That's a pretty mean and selfish way to behave.
Thus, he'd willingly behave poorly again.......for money! Surely that's a demonstration of someone who can be bought/bribed easily.

By your definition every businessman or businesswoman is a cheat... .

What a ridiculous extrapolation of my comment.
I was talking singularly about Trump, not as Trump as an example of successful people, just Trump.

If I said birds have feathers, would you assume I meant everything that flies have feathers?

 

[EFLImpudence]

You and Himmy are going to such lengths in attempts to be clever-dicks that you are only succeeding in achieving half that aim.

You've assumed what our objective is, and you've applied your own measure of our success.
What gives you such high degree of perception as to assume our objective?
What gives you such superiority to apply and measure our success?
Why don't you try a reasoned argument instead of resorting to pathetic insults?

You and JohnD are going to such lengths in attempts to be clever-dicks that you are only succeeding in achieving half that aim.

 

[Himaginn]

By your definition every businessman or businesswoman is a cheat

Where do you think you can see this "definition?"

HAG claimed that Trump, who is a businessman is a cheat and so has created his own definition..

You're weird. If I describe David Cameron as weak, am I creating a definition? It's an adjective, not a definition!

Sadly neither you nor HAG like to tell us your business, so we are happy to create our own picture of you two..

What's this got to do with it? Absolutely nothing!
You just thought you'd resort to a silly comment, because you can't help yourself.

 

[Himaginn]

You and Himmy are going to such lengths in attempts to be clever-dicks that you are only succeeding in achieving half that aim.

You've assumed what our objective is, and you've applied your own measure of our success.
What gives you such high degree of perception as to assume our objective?
What gives you such superiority to apply and measure our success?
Why don't you try a reasoned argument instead of resorting to pathetic insults?

You and JohnD are going to such lengths in attempts to be clever-dicks that you are only succeeding in achieving half that aim.

Why don't you try a reasoned argument instead of resorting to pathetic insults?

Why do people think it's OK to just be rude and insult another contributor without any attempt at addressing the issue or discussing the topic?

 

[Himaginn]

He made his money by cheating others. That's a pretty mean and selfish way to behave.
Thus, he'd willingly behave poorly again.......for money! Surely that's a demonstration of someone who can be bought/bribed easily.

Bankruptcy is just a way for rich people to keep assets and avoid paying creditors.

So if he uses bankruptcy to keep assets and avoiding paying creditors, doesn't that make him mean and selfish?

 

[LastMagicBean]

Why do people think it's OK to just be rude and insult another contributor

No idea, just stop doing it you f*cking nobstickle.

 

[EFLImpudence]

Why don't you try a reasoned argument instead of resorting to pathetic insults?

Reasoned argument with you is a waste of time and effort.

Why do people think it's OK to just be rude and insult another contributor without any attempt at addressing the issue or discussing the topic?

You really don't realise that you are one of the worst offenders, do you?

 

[EFLImpudence]

Bankruptcy is just a way for rich people to keep assets and avoid paying creditors.

So if he uses bankruptcy to keep assets and avoiding paying creditors, doesn't that make him mean and selfish?

Yes, that's why the bankruptcy rules were invented.

 

[Himaginn]

Why don't you try a reasoned argument instead of resorting to pathetic insults?

Reasoned argument with you is a waste of time and effort.

You ask questions based on your assumed premise, i.e. that immigration leads to cheap labour which causes lack of accommodation, and when I challenge you on this, you divert the discussion into the minutia of what constitutes a question! It was your attempt as evidence as to why business were supporting the Remain campaign. Now you claim that yours was the reasoned argument. It was an assumption built on an elliptical argument built on a false premise. It was totally unsustainable.
For a start, a question based on an unagreed premise is not a reasoned argument. It's an attempt to force one's view by assuming that the premise on which the question is based is a given fact. It wasn't and you made no attempt to justify it, and still haven't.
Secondly, to divert the discussion away from the main topic by arguing about minutia of what constitutes a question is not reasonable, It's just diversionary to avoid the main issue.

Why do people think it's OK to just be rude and insult another contributor without any attempt at addressing the issue or discussing the topic?

You really don't realise that you are one of the worst offenders, do you?

I don't just resort to insults without addressing the issue. I do describe someone as an idiot, a fool, a dullard, etc, along with the justification of why I consider my view to be fair and accurate.
You don't, you, and others, just use an insult without any explanation of why you consider it justified.
If I conclude by saying, you're incapable of reasoned argument, it's justified by the rest of my comment. It's not a standalone insult, without justification.

 

[LastMagicBean]

I don't just resort to insults without addressing the issue. I do describe someone as an idiot, a fool, a dullard, etc, along with the justification of why I consider my view to be fair and accurate.

So, RUDE then, as long as you feel it's ok.???

 

[nauseous]

Doesn't make Trump any less abhorrent though. He epitomises everything that is wrong with the world at present. A revolting human being.

Oh dear, you sound bitter. I hope You weren't one of those unfortunate victims caught up in Trumps failed University venture.

 

[noseall]

Doesn't make Trump any less abhorrent though. He epitomises everything that is wrong with the world at present. A revolting human being.

Oh dear, you sound bitter. I hope You weren't one of those unfortunate victims caught up in Trumps failed University venture.

Bitter?
If I said that I thought Adolf Hitler was abhorrent would you think me bitter? You however are deluded.