I acknowledged that but didn't think that those paths would be of sufficiently "very low impedance' to render the fault 'unnoticeable'.It's very likely that open PEN conductors go unnoticed. The path via common bonded ECPs will inevitably be of very low impedance, as it will be bonded at every installation.
Yes, that was the sort of scenario I was envisaging - although I admit that I didn't consider the additional complexity of the situation in which some properties which were 'connected by metal gas pipes' were not suffering from an open PEN conductor.Consider a typical street with 15 properties, all with a common metal gas service bonded in all of the properties. PEN conductor fails at a point which results in 10 of those properties not having any neutral connection. All of the neutral current for those 10 properties will now return via the individual bonding conductors, through the metal gas service and through the bonding conductors of the 5 properties which are still connected to the PEN. Everything works as normal, no one suspects anything ....
However, at least in terms of the issue which bernard raised (of hazardous N-'true E' pds), I don't think one can 'have it both ways'. IF, in a given property which is suffering from an 'open PEN', the path to earth via extraneous-c-ps is of such "very low impedance that everything in the property works totally normally then, essentially by definition, there will not be a substantial N-'true E' pd.
There is so much 'it depends' here that I don't think it makes sense to attempt a general answer.... until bonding conductors in the remaining properties get hot, gas meters start to melt and so on. With low or moderate loads it could be weeks or months before anything seems wrong.
At one extreme, IF all of the properties 'connected by a metal gas pipes' are suffering from an 'open PEN', and IF all those properties have bonded extraneous-c-ps of "very low impedance", then each of those bonding conductors will, on average, only carry one property's total load current, and (given the 10mm² minimum for bonding conductors with TN-C-S) I very much doubt that the bonding conductor will come to any harm. I can't speak for gas meters, but if a 10mm² conductor doesn't melt, I can't believe that a gas meter would - and if gas sup[pliers thought there was credible risk of gas meters 'melting' (which would be very bad news!) as a result of any credible current, they would surely isolate them (electrically) from electrical installations, wouldn't they?
At the other extreme, if you are envisaging a vast network of properties (electrically) interconnected by metal gas pipes, of which a very small proportion are suffering from an 'open PEN', then the neutral current from the affected properties would be spread so widely that the amount of that current in the bonding conductors (and gas meters!) of the properties would presumably be of no concern - and, as above, if the situation in the 'affected' properties is such they 'everything is working totally normally';, then they wouln't be seeing a particularly high pd between their neutral and (true) earth.
Between those extremes are various shades of grey - and, of course, as utility supply pipes become progressively changed to plastic, the scenarios you describe will presumably become increasingly uncommon.
Kind Regards, John