I
imamartian
sounds like you're responding to the reports of a fight rather than a debate about conspiracies !!!
sounds like you're responding to the reports of a fight rather than a debate about conspiracies !!!
Sponsored Links
????????????
sounds like you're responding to the reports of a fight rather than a debate about conspiracies !!!
I
imamartian
????????????
sounds like you're responding to the reports of a fight rather than a debate about conspiracies !!!
deleted one post, then question marks for the other.... whats your point?
Sponsored Links
Looking for another conspiracy?
Simple explanation. cock up in repply, hence deleted and the question marks are in response to your previous comment about a fight.
I
imamartian
Ahhh ok, so you can't see owt wrong with CCTV? the more cameras the merrier? well in that case i agree fully.... ! if you've got nowt to hide, you've got nowt to hide lol !! i'm in total agreement!!!
J
joinerjohn
As Martian says, the only people who fear CCTV are those who have something to hide. ..Why do you think most of the recent rioters wore face masks/balaclavas/scarves, to cover their faces??
Also CCTV is there to film the general public, ,,,,,,not the airspace above them.
Also CCTV is there to film the general public, ,,,,,,not the airspace above them.
And keep me in a job.Also CCTV is there to film the general public, ,,,,,,not the airspace above them.
I like the way you provide zero evidence to back up any of your claims.
Remember, extraodinary claims, require extraodinary evidence. All of your claims require extraodinary evidence, as they are so far off what is known by everyone else.
You say frame 20 was removed? Prove it. And no, conspiracy sites won't cut it. Prove it was intentionally removed. With things like evidence and not emotion.
You say the US Governenment denied people jumped? Prove it. Even the 9/11 Commission states people jumped. Maybe they said people fell? Does this show that the Government was involved? No.
Black box destroyed? So what. The planes went through buildings. The black box is device with intricate parts. There is a limit to what it will survive (they don't always survive!). If they remained within the building prior to collapse (likely as they are generally are located in the tail end of the plane), then they would have been subjected to the same fall and impact from falling steelwork like other material in the upper parts of the building. You may recall that most material was smashed to small pieces.
That they found a hijackers passport is unsurprising, as a passport would be undamaged from falling such a height. As they were likely at the front of the plane, the likelyhood is that it got flung out (with other items) with the initial impact. There are pictures of paper and debris scattered on the ground prior to the collapse. Also, it wasn't the only passport recovered.
Insurance: Silversein wanted to insure the complex for less than $2bn, but the insurance company wanted to insurnce them for $5bn. The final figure was a comprimise ($3.55bm for 1,2,4,and 5wtc). And they were insured for terrorism, as the 1993 bombing showed such things were worthwhile:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,34211,00.html
"Even after the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center in 1993 and the
Oklahoma City bombing in 1995, insurers in the United States did not view either
international or domestic terrorism as a risk that should be explicitly considered
when pricing their commercial insurance policy, principally because losses from
terrorism had historically been small and, to a large degree, uncorrelated. Thus,
prior to September 11, 2001, terrorism coverage in the United States was an
unnamed peril covered in most standard all-risk commercial and homeowners’
policies covering damage to property and contents"
http://grace.wharton.upenn.edu/risk/downloads/05-03-HK.pdf
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Silverstein#Insurance_dispute
Oh, and the estimated cost of rebuilding greatly exceeds the insurance payout:
"The proceeds of the insurance policies arising from the destruction of the previous buildings were insufficient to cover the cost of rebuilding all the insured buildings." (From wiki above)
Coming out with wild claims might make you feel good, but they show huge disrespect to the those involved in that day. Perhaps you should consider that the truth is far more mundane and yet shocking than you may believe: that a bunch of terrorists killed thousands, and the US Government missed the signs of it coming.
L
LooPrEvil
And keep me in a job.Also CCTV is there to film the general public, ,,,,,,not the airspace above them.
Well get out there and do your job, rather than posting on here!!
Or maybe you are retired?
L
LooPrEvil
Its strange how the authorities cannot dispell the conspiracy theories though. Let them prove what happened - but they can't!
L
LooPrEvil
That is very true.
No one has ever proved that the bandersnatch and the jabberwocky don't exist, does that mean they do??? idiot.
H
holmslaw
Heres what happens when a plane hits something solid - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUhfh4wV7xc - not much left is there.
Sponsored Links
