red meat doesnt need a reputable source
Amnesty on asylum claims
- Thread starter Notch7
- Start date
Sponsored Links
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 17,097
- Reaction score
- 2,595
- Country
It didn't get much support last time
petition.parliament.uk
Petition: Amnesty for undocumented migrants after 10 years and reduce 20 year ILR rule
The Government should grant amnesty to undocumented migrants who have been living in the UK for 10 years or more, and reduce the 20 year residence rule for Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR). This should be decreased to 14 years. It is unjust.
petition.parliament.uk
Great first post. Amnesty no. The gov know that people from some countries will be granted asylum according to the rules used. This can be used to process them more quickly and avoid some other aspects.
It also probably leaves them more freedom with people who do not come from them.
It also probably leaves them more freedom with people who do not come from them.
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 17,097
- Reaction score
- 2,595
- Country
Rishi Sunak promises new laws to stop illegal migration and 'spurious' appeals
The PM says those who enter the UK illegally will be "swiftly returned" and MPs will set an "annual quota" to determine how many asylum seekers can come to the country.
Looks like it was part of a bigger package.
Sponsored Links
Rishi Sunak promises new laws to stop illegal migration and 'spurious' appeals
The PM says those who enter the UK illegally will be "swiftly returned" and MPs will set an "annual quota" to determine how many asylum seekers can come to the country.news.sky.com
Looks like it was part of a bigger package.
Any evidence of an "amnesty?"
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 17,097
- Reaction score
- 2,595
- Country
Why are you asking me? I wasn't the one claiming there was an Amnesty. The quote was:
It does however appear that the government are looking at a range of measures including safe routes as well as a blanket ban on illegal entrants.
If that kills off the traffickers business and stops illegal migrants, rather than genuine people who need help - it will get my vote.
It does however appear that the government are looking at a range of measures including safe routes as well as a blanket ban on illegal entrants.
If that kills off the traffickers business and stops illegal migrants, rather than genuine people who need help - it will get my vote.
- Joined
- 22 Aug 2006
- Messages
- 5,751
- Reaction score
- 693
- Country
What the gov is proposing (fly them back to their country of origin) is one of those measures we were told with some vigour, is illegal.
Syrians, Afghans and others do apparently pass the tests as legitimate refugees.
So who supports sending them to Syria, Afgahanistan?
To stop the immigration industry run by gangs, if the boats were returned they'd be stuck in France, which has problems but is surely better than Syria etc. The folk would see money being lost, so stop trying. I know that's "illegal" too - so pick your "law". Poles did the same.
It would rely on Sunak's supposed alternative legal routes being set up, of course, though Poland didn't suggest any alternative to its barbed wire fences.
Syrians, Afghans and others do apparently pass the tests as legitimate refugees.
So who supports sending them to Syria, Afgahanistan?
To stop the immigration industry run by gangs, if the boats were returned they'd be stuck in France, which has problems but is surely better than Syria etc. The folk would see money being lost, so stop trying. I know that's "illegal" too - so pick your "law". Poles did the same.
It would rely on Sunak's supposed alternative legal routes being set up, of course, though Poland didn't suggest any alternative to its barbed wire fences.
Sunak's recent announcement briefly mention a new change. Providing routes to safe places where they can apply without actually being here. No details given.
Albanians. Some have been sending them back for a while. Why so slow here. Even so a few are accepted - I wonder why.
Much of the rest. Afraid I agree with Starmer - same usual noises other than putting more people in to vet them but why so late. Also more places to house them as cheaper than hotels. All sorts of places. I wonder what state they are in. Local residents - no answer to what they may think about the use of the area they live in.
Sunak says he will clear the backlog by the end of next year. When asked directly if he will do that - no answer.
Albanians. Some have been sending them back for a while. Why so slow here. Even so a few are accepted - I wonder why.
Much of the rest. Afraid I agree with Starmer - same usual noises other than putting more people in to vet them but why so late. Also more places to house them as cheaper than hotels. All sorts of places. I wonder what state they are in. Local residents - no answer to what they may think about the use of the area they live in.
Sunak says he will clear the backlog by the end of next year. When asked directly if he will do that - no answer.
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 17,097
- Reaction score
- 2,595
- Country
@Justin Passing reading between the lines I think they are going to do deals with other safe countries. Other countries seem to have managed either to continue with illegal policies unchecked or the cries of "its illegal under international law" aren't well founded.
Sunak says we're all having leccy cars in a few years, hospital waiting lists erased cos of some pop up tents, no more gas in new builds bla bla.
Sunak is the ultimate Tory bullshitter. Sunak will help see Labour into power next time round. Can't believe I said that. Can't believe I hope it happens.
Proof? No imagination. Some countries get on with it and meet the rules.
One of the Millibands was on C4 talking about the real problem. Displaced people. Enormous increase in longer term recent years. Starving, floods and conflict. Latter figures significantly. They are entitled to cross boarders. More attention needs to be given to the causes. There is an enormous number of people in this situation. They can not all come here or go elsewhere. There are far to many of them and for a variety of reasons it's likely to get worse.
People like you just refuse to accept that for various reason the people who get to stay do so because they meet the rules. Kids have their complications. Yet you back a government who's main problem is failing to continue to cope with them and as a result finish up housing and supporting them for extremely long periods of time. Yet per head of population wise we get less than others.
UK and a asylum - currently only Afghans can come here in a sensible way. LOL Even a Tory pointed that out - asked a question about E Africans and no reply. Same question asked on C4 - reply complete and utter flannel.
Sponsored Links
Similar threads
