Now you are moving the goalposts or desperately clutching at straws
we all know energy exists, you can't just rename energy "god" to prove there is a god ffs
So when I fart all that energy I emit is god? Have I got that right?
So when I fart all that energy I emit is god? Have I got that right?
Sponsored Links
Now you are moving the goalposts or desperately clutching at straws
we all know energy exists, you can't just rename energy "god" to prove there is a god ffs
Why not? give me a good reason that what created this universe and what is responsible for all life within our universe cannot be called God,
i know you haven't the capacity to think wider for yourself, you are a book worm, you only follow what was taught to you, but start thinking for yourself as well.
Now you are moving the goalposts or desperately clutching at straws
we all know energy exists, you can't just rename energy "god" to prove there is a god ffs
Why not? give me a good reason that what created this universe and what is responsible for all life within our universe cannot be called God,
i know you haven't the capacity to think wider for yourself, you are a book worm, you only follow what was taught to you, but start thinking for yourself as well, and apply reason of logic, why should you accept blindly what others tell you in text books, why can't you imagine other possibilities, after all most things in science are also based on concepts that are still relatively new and unproven. They are not proved as such, but based on observations. Observations alone cannot be ultimate truth, what we observe may not be real, it could be illusion. But you can't beat logic!
Now you are moving the goalposts or desperately clutching at straws
we all know energy exists, you can't just rename energy "god" to prove there is a god ffs
Why not? give me a good reason that what created this universe and what is responsible for all life within our universe cannot be called God,
......................................................................................................,
M F from London I have a question for you, you accuse matt1e of being a book worm, pray tell how did learn about god?
i know you haven't the capacity to think wider for yourself, you are a book worm, you only follow what was taught to you, but start thinking for yourself as well.
Sponsored Links
Now you are moving the goalposts or desperately clutching at straws
we all know energy exists, you can't just rename energy "god" to prove there is a god ffs
So when I fart all that energy I emit is god? Have I got that right?
fart is another name for some smelly gas called hydrogen sulphide and methane gas that emerges from your anus, if you bring a lighter and fart you will be pleasantly amused, but before you do that get a Corgi registration! as it is illegal to touch your anus as you cannot touch any gas appliances unless you are qualified!
Now you are moving the goalposts or desperately clutching at straws
we all know energy exists, you can't just rename energy "god" to prove there is a god ffs
So when I fart all that energy I emit is god? Have I got that right?
fart is another name for some smelly gas called hydrogen sulphide and methane gas that emerges from your anus, if you bring a lighter and fart you will be pleasantly amused, but before you do
that get a Corgi registration! as it is illegal to touch your anus as you cannot touch any gas appliances unless you are qualified!
That'll be gas safe then, corgi is no more much like the fictional deity you hold in such high esteem....
To me gas safe and corgi are no different, they are the tow sides of the same coin except one side is now defunct, and you knew exactly what i meant.
as for fictional deity, indeed those who worship deities and stone idols, are very much also worshiping God since each and every atom is made of his energy, praying to a stone idol is praying to God himself, logically of course.
But be cautioned, you must never touch your anus, get a gas safe engineer to wipe your anus if you produce gas from your orifice! you are not allowed to do your own service
Mike debating with you is like debating with this woman
Tell you what, Dawkins may be atheist but he has the patience of a F@@king saint
Tell you what, Dawkins may be atheist but he has the patience of a F@@king saint
I will give you a good reason
how about nothing created the universe it has always been in existence
Good enough for you to perhaps think yes maybe?
Oh yes I love reading, I love learning, and I love thinking for myself, if I didn't I would probably believe in god due to blind faith (remind you of anyone?)
and as following what was taught to me well yes if I know it to be correct I do, so what
I'm perfectly capable of being open-minded for example I will never spout off about the big bang theory as being fact because its unproven
but being open minded about the existence of the single deity known as "god"? well sorry but believing in fairy-tales based on hearsay and gossip passed down and edited over centuries like some huge game of Chinese whispers?, come on!
I know what my reasoning and logic tells me
matt1, I do not have a problem in accepting that man might have emerged from an ape, simply because God created all beings.
if I was God, how would I create one being different to the next, quite simply i would design the first one and after a while I would tweak a bit here and tweak and bit there, and then I have MkII being, I like it, and after a while I will tweak a little here and a little there, and tweak it to create yet another version, using the basic form, just like all cars have 4 wheels, but different shapes, man tweaks his designs and creates different shapes but the basic concept remains the same, so I can explain why man may have a very close resemblance to Apes as God may have borrowed the basic concept of a primate and modified its DNA and created a slightly different being and then like we do to cars given a bigger engine and so on, how can you prove my theory wrong?
of course to prove that my theory is correct, man designs the car first, with basics that goes in all cars, like engine gearbox, wheels, steering wheel, brakes, and so on, later on man also designs completely weird things like tanks that run on tracks, creates a big truck with more than 4 wheels, so lie wise God also modifies DNA heavily and we get things like whales, elephants, birds, and snakes who don't even have legs! my theory makes far more sense than those evolutionist who claim that we directly evolved from Apes due to need to adapt to environment, that is plain wrong, man was created by someone (God) using the base from another creature having been created previously, man makes a hoover craft, and than abandons it, because it was uneconomical and so it is now in a scrap heap, same way God created dinosaurs, they are now in a scrap heap.
Are we not now on the verge of creating super humans ourselves, though if we do, the first thing i would do is ram his ass!
Oh and I bet my own ass, you cannot create anything from Nothing, not even in a zillion zillion zillion x 10 to the power of 10 zillion years!
if I was God, how would I create one being different to the next, quite simply i would design the first one and after a while I would tweak a bit here and tweak and bit there, and then I have MkII being, I like it, and after a while I will tweak a little here and a little there, and tweak it to create yet another version, using the basic form, just like all cars have 4 wheels, but different shapes, man tweaks his designs and creates different shapes but the basic concept remains the same, so I can explain why man may have a very close resemblance to Apes as God may have borrowed the basic concept of a primate and modified its DNA and created a slightly different being and then like we do to cars given a bigger engine and so on, how can you prove my theory wrong?
of course to prove that my theory is correct, man designs the car first, with basics that goes in all cars, like engine gearbox, wheels, steering wheel, brakes, and so on, later on man also designs completely weird things like tanks that run on tracks, creates a big truck with more than 4 wheels, so lie wise God also modifies DNA heavily and we get things like whales, elephants, birds, and snakes who don't even have legs! my theory makes far more sense than those evolutionist who claim that we directly evolved from Apes due to need to adapt to environment, that is plain wrong, man was created by someone (God) using the base from another creature having been created previously, man makes a hoover craft, and than abandons it, because it was uneconomical and so it is now in a scrap heap, same way God created dinosaurs, they are now in a scrap heap.
Are we not now on the verge of creating super humans ourselves, though if we do, the first thing i would do is ram his ass!
Oh and I bet my own ass, you cannot create anything from Nothing, not even in a zillion zillion zillion x 10 to the power of 10 zillion years!
matt1, I do not have a problem in accepting that man might have emerged from an ape, simply because God created all beings.
if I was God, how would I create one being different to the next, quite simply i would design the first one and after a while I would tweak a bit here and tweak and bit there, and then I have MkII being, I like it, and after a while I will tweak a little here and a little there, and tweak it to create yet another version, using the basic form, just like all cars have 4 wheels, but different shapes, man tweaks his designs and creates different shapes but the basic concept remains the same, so I can explain why man may have a very close resemblance to Apes as God may have borrowed the basic concept of a primate and modified its DNA and created a slightly different being and then like we do to cars given a bigger engine and so on, how can you prove my theory wrong?
Are we not now on the verge of creating super humans ourselves, though if we do, the first thing i would do is ram his ass!
Theories are for proving correct not the other way around ie prove one theory correct and it will automatically prove all the other theories incorrect its more economical to do it that way your logic should tell you that so I dont need to prove your theory incorrect
oh and your sexual preferences are irrelevant
matt1e, you should have guessed by now that I do not practice any religion, I am totally an independent thinker, I do not follow other people's ideas unless they are hard proven, I respect einstein because he was a greatest person ever to understand nature and his laws, and how he first worked out that energy cannot be destroyed, if it was not for him, I doubt i could have based any of my own theories which sound more convincing than just the big bang theory springing out of Nothing!
a debate is a debate, but at least give him a seat,and a cupa tea.and a cake lol. i like dawkins, he is a gentleman to be honest, even tho i dont agree whith him, he is friendly kinda chap.
Sponsored Links
Similar threads
- Sombrero
- General Discussion
