C
calorific
Define "unnatural". This is key to your argument, so it has to be clear and beyond question. Surely?
Don't sidestep. Define "unnatural"Where's the evidence it's beneficial as opposed to damaging.????
Don't sidestep. Define "unnatural"Where's the evidence it's beneficial as opposed to damaging.????
How do you know? Where's your evidence as to what is or is not natural?Homosexual parenting IS. That's unnatural.
How do you know? Where's your evidence as to what is or is not natural?Homosexual parenting IS. That's unnatural.
It may well be statistically "unusual", but this doesn't make it "unnatural"
Where's your evidence that it's "unnatural". Where's your evidence that it's beneficial or damaging? None, so why assume the worst and expect problems?How do you know? Where's your evidence as to what is or is not natural?Homosexual parenting IS. That's unnatural.
It may well be statistically "unusual", but this doesn't make it "unnatural"
Where's your evidence to show its beneficial or damaging?????
None.
Are you only going back to "communities"?If you want to know what is 'natural' for homo-sapiens then you need to go back to hunter-gatherer communities and see what they do. What is considered 'natural' for us modern lot has been imposed by religion and government and is not 'natural' at all.
Whether the subsequent nurturing of the children is better done by one parental model or not is under scrutiny.
I trust that you also feel that sodomy and oral sex is also "unnatural" between heterosexual couples and that any happily married couple who happen to enjoy either of these sorts of activity should be prevented from having children on those grounds.What a load of s***te. There's nothing natural about two blokes doing each other up the chuff or poking each other in the chops. And as for them adopting children the people promoting that should be shot