BARRSTARDS !!!!!!

They're not harming anyone. In fact, if they begin adopting kids, they may actually be doing a service. After all, are you honestly going to tell me that it's preferable for a child to be pushed from pillar to post in and between institutions and the occasional foster parent that be brought within a stable, warm and loving home, albeit one created by a same sex couple?
 
Sponsored Links
They're not harming anyone. In fact, if they begin adopting kids, they may actually be doing a service. After all, are you honestly going to tell me that it's preferable for a child to be pushed from pillar to post in and between institutions and the occasional foster parent that be brought within a stable, warm and loving home, albeit one created by a same sex couple?

Nonsense.
 
Whereas if the truth be told, neither are natural. The nuclear family that we are told is 'natural' was imposed upon us because religion and government decided so. Kids would naturally be looked after in a creche environment and mainly by a load of teenagers.

What a load of tosh.
 
Sponsored Links
Well given the fact that civil partnerships :rolleyes: are already breaking down and the partners are fighting over the children they've acquired I guess the children involved will suffer at least as much as those from hetro couples that divorce and probably a lot more when two bitching men or women get at it.

As for not hurting anyone. They are intent on doing just that they're demand the right to stay in the homes of christians as paying guests (I've yet to read of them demanding to stay in any muslim run establishments) to marry, to have children which nature prevents them from having naturally and force the majority to accept them as normal :rolleyes:

I went to see singing the rain in london a few weeks back and the west end was brought to a standstill by a load of rug munchers and feminazis demanding their rights :evil: I was astounded by how many of the rug munchers looked like blokes. And yet I'm no longer surprised by how many limp wristed blokes are walking around looking and sounding like some failed experiment :LOL:

Yeah, they're normal, natural alright :rolleyes:
 
Well given the fact that civil partnerships :rolleyes: are already breaking down and the partners are fighting over the children they've acquired I guess the children involved will suffer at least as much as those from hetro couples that divorce and probably a lot more when two **** men or women get at it.
"probably a lot more" - interesting assumption based on no evidence one way or another. The breakdown of any partnership nearly always creates problems with kids involved, so I fail to see how this part of your argument is of any relevance

As for not hurting anyone. They are intent on doing just that they're demand the right to stay in the homes of christians as paying guests
What, all of them? The case you cite is about one particular couple in one particular circumstance which we've all argued ad infinitum without resolution.

(I've yet to read of them demanding to stay in any muslim run establishments) to marry,
Same holds for hetero couples or single parents

to have children which nature prevents them from having naturally and force the majority to accept them as normal :rolleyes:
I asked you before about IVF, caesarian section, AI and how "natural" these things are. I also asked you whether you thought that hetero couples who practice oral and anal sex should be discounted from having children through their "unnatural" acts

I went to see singing the rain in london a few weeks back and the west end was brought to a standstill by a load of rug munchers and feminazis demanding their rights :evil: I was astounded by how many of the rug munchers looked like blokes. And yet I'm no longer surprised by how many limp wristed blokes are walking around looking and sounding like some failed experiment :LOL:
I see loads of big burly blokes shooting each other and picking on individuals. Hardly a great role model for being "straight", but feel free to cherry pick single anecdotal cases to make generalisations

Yeah, they're normal, natural alright :rolleyes:
Define "normal" and "natural". Are you the personification of these facets? Don't make me laugh :rolleyes:
 

It's b*llocks. That's like saying, if a half drowned child washed up on the lonely beach, the best option would be for the gay couple to save her.
Of course it would.
But you're arguing that it wouldn't since she might see the chuffers hold hands and give each other a kiss and thus be emotionally scarred for life and join the salvation army or something.

The only argument that would persuade me of the ills of gay couples adopting children would be if those children, statistically speaking, tended to become Jehovah's witnesses.
 
I see loads of big burly blokes shooting each other and picking on individuals. Hardly a great role model for being "straight",

What makes you think big burly blokes are not faggots? :LOL:
 
I see loads of big burly blokes shooting each other and picking on individuals. Hardly a great role model for being "straight",

What makes you think big burly blokes are not faggots? :LOL:
Because they're not wearing yellow trousers nor leathers, nor prancing around singing ring a ring a roses.
 
Define "normal" and "natural". Are you the personification of these facets? Don't make me laugh

Normal and natural is male and female.
Unnatural is two faggots boning each other.
Get it yet?
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top