Off you flounce and take your glove puppets with you.Now, I reckon I've wasted enough time humouring your inane, meaningless flannel by replying to it, so its Sayonara from me, and "FFS" from you.
Off you flounce and take your glove puppets with you.Now, I reckon I've wasted enough time humouring your inane, meaningless flannel by replying to it, so its Sayonara from me, and "FFS" from you.
Off you flounce and take your glove puppets with you.
He's flounced off, I think.At least give us a 'boyo'.
So you are agreeing it's a right wing influenced channel, not news source.Let me be clear about what I’m saying: that there is more balance in GBN than others have suggested, yes, though the extent of that balance and its influence on their output has to be seen in the light of an anti-immigration, pro Daily-Telegraph-reader agenda. I’d be the first to acknowledge the existence that agenda but I also welcome the fact that they provide a voice from “another place”. And of course all news outlets have some kind of agenda, because they are staffed by humans, not robots.
You just got owned old boyo!Off you flounce and take your glove puppets with you.
That wasn’t the original question, it’s just you hounding people again.So you are agreeing it's a right wing influenced channel, not news source.
The original question was, what news source is better than the BBC for general news ?
Defend GB news all you like, but it doesn't answer the question.
Jeez, go back and read.That wasn’t the original question, it’s just you hounding people again.
Give it a break.
He thinks it's balanced because they have guests on there that are not RWR flag-shagging gammons.So you are agreeing it's a right wing influenced channel, not news source.
JohnD asked the original question in post 2Jeez, go back and read.
I've asked countless times on this thread. What is a better general news source than the BBC.
All I've seen is promotion of an opinion channel, GB news. It is not a better source,
Boyo is triggered.He thinks it's balanced because they have guests on there that are not RWR flag-shagging gammons.
Yep forget it - its like talking to a knitted jumper. They come back withNow, I reckon I've wasted enough time humouring your inane, meaningless flannel by replying to it, so its Sayonara from me, and "FFS" from you.
And you are trolling. AGAINBoyo is triggered.
And as if by magic -------------Then there are those on here who deliberately try to antagonise the poster to try and get the thread shut down or the poster banned.
He thinks it's balanced because they have guests on there that are not RWR flag-shagging gammons.
No I’m making a statement. As I’ve previously mentioned, you call me a “Troll” when it suits you.And you are trolling. AGAIN
There were several. Do you support them all?
Feel free to carry on.JohnD asked the original question in post 2
So yours wasn’t the “original question” it was just a question.