BBC news Black out

Sponsored Links
Let me be clear about what I’m saying: that there is more balance in GBN than others have suggested, yes, though the extent of that balance and its influence on their output has to be seen in the light of an anti-immigration, pro Daily-Telegraph-reader agenda. I’d be the first to acknowledge the existence that agenda but I also welcome the fact that they provide a voice from “another place”. And of course all news outlets have some kind of agenda, because they are staffed by humans, not robots.
So you are agreeing it's a right wing influenced channel, not news source.

The original question was, what news source is better than the BBC for general news ?

Defend GB news all you like, but it doesn't answer the question.
 
Sponsored Links
So you are agreeing it's a right wing influenced channel, not news source.

The original question was, what news source is better than the BBC for general news ?

Defend GB news all you like, but it doesn't answer the question.
That wasn’t the original question, it’s just you hounding people again.

Give it a break.
 
That wasn’t the original question, it’s just you hounding people again.

Give it a break.
Jeez, go back and read.

I've asked countless times on this thread. What is a better general news source than the BBC.

All I've seen is promotion of an opinion channel, GB news. It is not a better source,
 
Jeez, go back and read.

I've asked countless times on this thread. What is a better general news source than the BBC.

All I've seen is promotion of an opinion channel, GB news. It is not a better source,
JohnD asked the original question in post 2

So yours wasn’t the “original question” it was just a question.
 
Now, I reckon I've wasted enough time humouring your inane, meaningless flannel by replying to it, so its Sayonara from me, and "FFS" from you.
Yep forget it - its like talking to a knitted jumper. They come back with
1 "no it doesn't"
2 Utter nonsense.
3 Who are these you speak of?
4 It isn't being controlled by the lizards....
5 When did it say that
6 Then you will waste your time collating the proof and they will completely ignore it.
7 Then there are some on here who will completely make things up that you said and heavily edit your post to fit their point,
8 or will make things up that you are thinking and post them in quote marks like its something that you actually said.
9 Then there are those on here who deliberately try to antagonise the poster to try and get the thread shut down or the poster banned.
Its actually best just to not reply and let them takeover and have their own circular Wan# over the subject
Anyone is welcome to downlaod and use my sticker I made for when noseall go's too far byond his normal level of trolling.
Troll-tw#at.jpg
 
Last edited:
JohnD asked the original question in post 2

So yours wasn’t the “original question” it was just a question.
Feel free to carry on.

You are the 1st AND ONLY person I've ever done this to on any forum. I believe strongly in free speech, but that speech has to be constructive, even if I don't agree with it.

You are just trolling. On ignore you go.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top