Please note that i have not made ONE insulting remark to anyone in this thread and am just offering an opinion of my own that doesn't involve
RANDOM DESTRUCTION OF PEOPLES UNKNOWN.
yet the same group continue to make insulting remarks about me and 1 other simply because we do not share THEIR viewpoint
You sound like those SHARIA LAW guys yourselves THINK like we THINK or else
Sadly in order to defend freedom of speech for the majority must resist those minorities who are against it. |Even though that may seem an oxymoron sadly that's how it works.) There is little sense in defending their freedom of speech in the short term if their known ultimate aim is to remove everybody Else's. Your argument (for what it's worth) is poorly defined and rather idealistically juvenile. It's sweet in it's simplicity but it remains schoolboy level of idealogy none the less.
We have had several world wars to defend peace. Innocent people died on both sides but as a result the majority of the world remains free. If we had chosen to follow the path you appear to champion then that would have ended many years ago
It's called the greater good..
I dont need the boring patronising lecture and the Wars you are referring to presumably WW1 and WW2 cannot be compared to the situation we find ourselves in today largely as a fault of our own greed for the resources of other countries that we have often been the agressor in to suit our own aims.
WW2 for example was a united stand against an aggressor which very clearly and ACTIVELY set out to conquer the world to its viewpoint in OPEN WARFARE.
This is an entirely different situation altogether, people spout all kinds of BS they have right to do so.
If they ACT on it thats a different matter and then a measured and appropriate response is required to deal with it.
As for previous WWs yes we survived them I very much DOUBT we would survive another