- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 17,415
- Reaction score
- 2,401
- Country
That is factually wrong. Most boat people who are assessed are allowed to stay because they have valid claims of persecution.They, despite what you suggest, are economic migrants.
That is factually wrong. Most boat people who are assessed are allowed to stay because they have valid claims of persecution.They, despite what you suggest, are economic migrants.
As soon as RNLI pick them up, about turn, drop them back on the beach they came from. Soon stop the problem.People are coming from France by small boat, it’s very hard to stop that, once they are here what do you think we should do with them?
Invade France? Lol, ok...As soon as RNLI pick them up, about turn, drop them back on the beach they came from.
You’re talking to yourself. Listen to what you’re saying and act on it.Maybe you'd like to actually contribute to a topic rather than repeatedly highlighting your inability to come up with anything constructive?
But then you'd rather criticise anyone and everything that doesn't fit it with your prejudiced view of life...
, France has no more obligation to take asylum seekers than we do
The UK only takes 7% of asylum seekers in Europe so the claim we are a soft touch is not true.
The evidence shows most are genuine asylum seekers not economic migrants
Neither do we, all good then.But France don't accommodate migrants in 4* luxury
Oh yes.Because they had a plan to send people were they didn't want to be and to put laws in place so that anyone arriving illegally, never had the right to remain. It was starting to work.
He does though.No one (including biking from the boatyard) seriously gave the Rwanda idiocy any credence.
No, the numbers accepted prove they are genuine.Only you believe that they are genuine.
So process them, not just accomodating them.But France don't accommodate migrants in 4* luxury - so looking like we are a soft touch. Well, liberals are anyway.
Also they're obviously not genuine asylum seekers. Genuine refugees aren't almost exclusively young males with thousands in their pockets to pay traffikers to whisk them to their preferred country. Only you believe that they are genuine.
Based on what they are told to say. Nothing else. What actual checks on their identity, nationality and reasons for persecution are made?That is factually wrong. Most boat people who are assessed are allowed to stay because they have valid claims of persecution.
Neither do we, all good then.
No, the numbers accepted prove they are genuine.
Shooting them in the channel would reduce the numbers, that doesn't make it a good policy.No one (including biking from the boatyard) seriously gave the Rwanda idiocy any credence.
Yes.Are you denying that 30,000 migrants are living in good hotels?