Boat illegals up under Labour.

[motorbiking]

completely wrong

we have already established that pushbacks are illegal....it says so in the link you provided

Any vessel that is in the vicinity of a boat in distress has a duty to attend.........and a rubber dinghy overloaded with people is in distress

Also you have still avoided answering why Priti Patel tried introducing legislation that prevented border force from prosecution


You can carry on being wrong if you want, your choice

A vessel is not in distress just because you think it’s unseaworthy otherwise half the crap in marinas would be pulled over by the authorities and people would constantly be checking if a vessel was in distress.

Do you think the vessel magically becomes in distress at the territorial limit?

You can keep being wrong if you like.

 

[motorbiking]

not true, its clearly easier to get to france than the UK, so it makes sense they have a higher refusal rate, although its not massively different as acceptance rates for France in 2023 were 52% and they took more asylum claims in 2023 (167,432)

More nonsense.

In 2023, France's asylum success rate was 31.4% at the first instance and 20.5% at the appeal stage. The number of people who received international protection in France in 2023 was 66,358, including minors.

Statistics - Asylum Information Database | European Council on Refugees and Exiles

Overview of statistical practice In France, detailed statistics on asylum applications and first instance decisions are published annually by the Office of Protection of Refugees and Stateless Persons (OFPRA) in its activity reports. The next OFPRA Activity Report will be published in spring...

asylumineurope.org

Are you stupid enough to think you can add those two numbers together ?

 

[denso13]

as acceptance rates for France in 2023 were 52% and they took more asylum claims in 2023 (167,432)

Facts don't matter, it's the bigotry that matters most to some.

 

[motorbiking]

Facts don't matter, it's the bigotry that matters most to some.

Or just constantly lying which seems to be your approach

 

[carmanmemoranda]

A vessel is not in distress just because you think it’s unseaworthy otherwise half the crap in marinas would be pulled over by the authorities and people would constantly be checking if a vessel was in distress.

Do you think the vessel magically becomes in distress at the territorial limit?

You can keep being wrong if you like.

An overloaded dinghy is not in distress ?

I wouldn't want you as the nearest boat to me if I was in distress

 

[Nwgs2]

Incomparable. The UK is geographically unique.

Yes it does seem so

 

[ellal]

If your point were true France would also have the same acceptance rate.

And yet they had a higher number of applications, and accepted more...

"Compared with other European countries, the UK received the fifth largest number of asylum seekers in the year ending June 2024 (97,107). The UK received 8% of the total number of asylum claimants across the EU+ and UK combined, and the 19th largest intake when measured ‘per head of population’.

"Germany received the highest number of people claiming asylum in the EU+ with 319,710 claimants, followed by Spain (163,755), France (163,190), and Italy (158,560)"

And the claimants differ in each country from which they came...

Thus acceptance criteria varies dependent on which country or origin the recipient country believes is safe or not safe.

 

[denso13]

And yet they had a higher number of applications, and accepted more...

Don't let facts get in the way though. Bigotry rulez...

 

[motorbiking]

Don’t publish a source incase they read it and call you out on the boll@x.

 

[Harry Bloomfield]

Yes, unfortunately you are.

A perfectly reasonable guess, or assumption, for the reasons I gave. Only a fool, would assume that the 93% were all genuine migrants. Genuine migrants, have no need to destroy their documents, once they arrive in any safe country.

 

[Harry Bloomfield]

Facts don't matter, it's the bigotry that matters most to some.

and the bigot, is you!

 

[denso13]

A perfectly reasonable guess, or assumption, for the reasons I gave.

No need to guess, just use the correct figures.

Genuine migrants, have no need to destroy their documents, once they arrive in any safe country.

How many do that? 99% again?

 

[Notch7]

View attachment 367427

Yes it does seem so

Yes that graphics appeals to really thick people.

Anybody with intelligence realises that the majority of refugees stay in the region and those that don't, disperse widely.

Anybody with intelligence that just because geography means UK is furthest away, does not mean UK shouldn't receive any.

 

[Notch7]

Don’t publish a source incase they read it and call you out on the boll@x.

You falsely claimed push backs are legal.

The source you provided proves otherwise.

I am sorry you keep being wrong

 

[Notch7]

you can add those two numbers

Of course you can.

France rejects more at first stage, so it doesn't prove what you claim

The only thing that counts is who takes more, and the answer is France.

So you are wrong, as you always are.....its what comes from trying to support right wing lies.