C
cornishwizard
dextrous hearing voices is telepathy nothing to do with god
And telepathy can just simply be explained can it?dextrous hearing voices is telepathy nothing to do with god
How can you be sure? To my limited knowledge, science has yet to accept/prove/explain the existence of telepathy.dextrous hearing voices is telepathy nothing to do with god
if a thought is strong some people can pick up on it, i have done in the past.How can you be sure? To my limited knowledge, science has yet to accept/prove/explain the existence of telepathy.dextrous hearing voices is telepathy nothing to do with god
Regardless of that (a point on which we may squabble to no avail), religions seem to want to define their "god" in wholly unhelpful and restrictive ways. I have a definition of what is my "god", but it sure don't include some mateyboy sitting on a throne, nor a load of tedious pr icks passing judgement on me, telling me to blow myself up, or offering my son for an al sex.
And telepathy can just simply be explained can it?dextrous hearing voices is telepathy nothing to do with god
How does that work then? How does this fit in with scientific empirical proof whereas the existence of god doesn't. And therein lies the problem - neither can be explained nor proved, and yet people have experiences of them.if a thought is strong some people can pick up on it, i have done in the past.
OH God, here we go again! What is it with March? A whole bunch of them joined!if a thought is strong some people can pick up on it, i have done in the past.How can you be sure? To my limited knowledge, science has yet to accept/prove/explain the existence of telepathy.dextrous hearing voices is telepathy nothing to do with god
Regardless of that (a point on which we may squabble to no avail), religions seem to want to define their "god" in wholly unhelpful and restrictive ways. I have a definition of what is my "god", but it sure don't include some mateyboy sitting on a throne, nor a load of tedious pr icks passing judgement on me, telling me to blow myself up, or offering my son for an al sex.
It's coz ees a wizard init?how does that work then?if a thought is strong some people can pick up on it, i have done in the past.
There's a lot of folklore going about, some no doubt caused by hallucinations through working in, for example, cornish tin mines.It's coz ees a wizard init?how does that work then?if a thought is strong some people can pick up on it, i have done in the past.
How does that work then? How does this fit in with scientific empirical proof whereas the existence of god doesn't. And therein lies the problem - neither can be explained nor proved, and yet people have experiences of them.if a thought is strong some people can pick up on it, i have done in the past.
But one could quite easily open up an analogous argument regarding "communicating" with a "god". It's that "can't feel it, can't touch it, but can experience it" thing again I'm afraidjust think of the brain as something that can transmit and receive. it may need a little help with this
I thnk you need to read that long post that cornishman put on here a page ago. You're demonstrating nearly all of the traits of brainwashing to which it alludeswithout god, why and how would we exist, and know right from wrong well most of us.
to believe there is no god or supreme power behind creation, is like to say the iffle tower came about by pure chance and coincidence by itself...and what are the odds of that....really?
intelligent design must have a creator, even science cannot deny this.
without god, why and how would we exist, and know right from wrong well most of us.
to believe there is no god or supreme power behind creation, is like to say the iffle tower came about by pure chance and coincidence by itself...and what are the odds of that....really?
intelligent design must have a creator, even science cannot deny this.